User talk:Stepshep/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Warning

Glad to see your alive, but please read rules of Wikipedia, you can not call people idiots, it is a personal attack, also i didnt put the swamp part if you were talking to me, it was put by someone else and i better worded it.--Threeblur0 (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

• Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections

• News and notes: Mapping geotagged articles language, import sources enabled, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:36, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009

• Election report: ArbCom election result announced

• News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more

• In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009

• News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news

• In the news: Criticism from climate change sceptic, decade in review

• Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations

• Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:09, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

• News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more

• In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:46, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

PS Please see the section on Threeblur0

The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010

• From the editor: Call for writers

• 2009 in review: 2009 in Review

• Books: New Book namespace created

• News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more

• In the news: Wikipedia in British schools, Hitler's Downfall meme, and more

• Features and admins: Approved this week

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010

• News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more

• In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more

• WikiProject report: Where are they now?

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:33, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010

• BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar

• Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century

• News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more

• In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?

• WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:44, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010

• From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy

• Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community

• News and notes: New CTO, Britain Loves Wikipedia, Telefónica partnership, Multimedia and more

• In the news: Wikipedia on CDs, BBC uses Wikipedia content, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs

• Sister projects: Sister project roundup

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010

• News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more

• In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more

• Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:28, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010

• News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more

• In the news: Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010

• News and notes: $2 Million donation, cybersquatting, comScore statistics and more

• In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010

• Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed

• News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more

• In the news: Idealizing the Star Spangled Banner, Curious Announcement, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010

• News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones

• In the news: Pentagon shooter used Wikipedia, soon iPhone OS will too

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Java

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010

• News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs

• In the news: Studies on collaboration and student usage, Main Page drives traffic to Time.com

• Dispatches: GA Sweeps end

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010

• Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts

• News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page

• In the news: Campaign for video, costs of crowdsourcing, iPhone app, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010

• News and notes: Usability rollout, downtime, admin phishing, Wikimania scholarships and more

• In the news: Overdue correction, Critical Point of View conference, brief headlines

• Sister projects: A handful of happenings

• WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:13, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010

• News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos

• In the news: Wikipedia influences drug terminology, brief headlines

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup

• Features and admins: This week in approvals

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

• Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images

• News and notes: Studying German flagged revisions, French library agreement, German court case

• In the news: SCOTUS hopeful edited bio, criticism from article subject

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

• News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits

• In the news: Study of featured article quality, Facebook's integration of Wikipedia, and more!

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikiproject Ohio

Please see that article that I have listed under Portal:Ohio/Selected Articles/Nominate to help determine if the most recently listed article gains your support as a Selected Ohio Article. Texas141 (talk) 20:37, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

• From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars

• Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders

• News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!

• In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!

• Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:23, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

• Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia

• News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news

• In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

• From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted

• Commons deletions: Porn madness

• Book review: Dan O'Sullivan's Wikipedia: a new community of practice?

• Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide

• News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All

• In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds

• Features and admins: Approved this week

• Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Helpme

Thanks. 1) I didn't know that. 2) Your prediction was correct.
Most appreciated. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 16:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Glad I could help. §hep^Talk 16:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

(So am I!! ;-) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk)

Wilson Bruce Evans House

Thanks for finding the picture; it's good to have just four unillustrated lines now. And good to see you back; I never expected to see you back on my watchlist again :-) Nyttend (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

No problem, always glad to be able to pop stuff like that in. §hep^Talk 12:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Stepshep/12086/secret

In a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34#Does WP:NOTMYSPACE apply to secret pages?), community consensus was that the policy Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not prohibits secret pages. Would you tag the page for deletion with {{db-userreq}}? Thank you, Cunard (talk) 08:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Sure. It's been awhile since I've looked at most of my subpages, will tag most of them. Thanks for the notice! §hep^Talk 00:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Stepshep/12086/secret

Hi, Stepshep. A few days ago, you wrote that you would tag User talk:Stepshep/12086/secret for deletion but have forgotten to do so. Would you add {{db-userreq}} to the page? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Stark County Courthouse

Hello, Stepshep. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

20:33, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion opinion

When you get a chance, could you check out this article for deletion? It needs some more eyes and I'd definitely like to see some additional opinions. --JonRidinger (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing. Will be able to take a look around 2. §hep^Talk 11:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

The Ohio State University

The reverts in which are warning me over are vandalism and against consensus. The other editor is using multiple accounts to continue to remove information from the page. Please review the page history and talk page.--Jojhutton (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Asia Society.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Asia Society.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:50, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Stepshep. You have new messages at Presidentman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 20:29, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Stepshep. You have new messages at Presidentman's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 20:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PowerGrid Corporation of India logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PowerGrid Corporation of India logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about Wikipedia:WikiProject Ohio revert

All my fault (your 100percent right)..did not see that the group was so well organized....Again i apologizes....Moxy (talk) 21:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

No problem. You have good intentions and that's all that really matters in my book. Look forward to seeing you around, §hep^Talk 21:10, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Foreaker Covered Bridge

Unwikified writing with almost no sources is Bwsmith84's typical style: see other articles he's written, such as Monroe Bank or William C. Mooney House. Besides the mass of unsourced material, do you have any major concerns? Nyttend (talk) 11:30, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I almost forgot...

...to thank you for your vote on my bugzilla enhancement ticket. Of course, it's quite possible you didn't realise it was my ticket, but I suspect you may have known. Regardless, thank you anyway...  Begoon&#149;talk 16:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure. I saw the link you gave to it and thought it was a good idea. §hep^Talk 17:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I guessed that was the case. My thanks are due to the fact that you took the extra step. Most people don't bother, and it can make a difference.  Begoon&#149;talk 17:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Pending changes/Straw poll on interim usage

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Reverting my edits

If you read over the terms of use of the image in question you will see that this image can be used if you cite the owner which I have now done so there is no need to keep tring to revert my edits :) Talk «««OisinisiO»»» Talk 22:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Would you please understand that the logo falls under WP:NFCC and that you have added an incorrect copyright tag to the Commons image page. I will continue to revert your edits as they violate WP:IUP. I will copy my comments from the Commons talk page below, so that you may see what I mean. Shep^Talk 22:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Copied from commons:File talk:Geocaching Logo even newer.svg

The page I linked to 1 explicitly states: "Any reprinting, sublicensing, copying, modifying, publishing, assignment, transfer, sales, or other distribution of the Groundspeak Geocaching logos contained within this website or any other website is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of Groundspeak. The user shall not copy, reverse engineer, translate, port, modify or make derivative works of the Groundspeak Geocaching logos without express written permission from Groundspeak." Yet the CC-by-SA copyright tag you have applied states that: "You are free:, to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, to remix – to adapt the work" This is in direct contradiction of Groundspeak's own terms. This makes it ABUNDANTLY clear that the file is not cc-by-sa or ANY OTHER free license. Therefore the image in non-free and not suitable for Commons. In case this is still not clear to you I've bolded the text in question. §hep^Talk 22:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

---

I am just going to give up because I am obviosly not going to get anywhere lol :) Talk «««OisinisiO»»» Talk 22:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please feel free to come back when you have a stronger handle on the usage of copyrighted works. And I might as well get this out of the way too. What is your relation to the account Josephomeara? If it is your account please review WP:MULTIPLE. Inappropriate actions using either account will result in a visit to WP:SPI. Shep^Talk 22:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Oh, you might as well read Wikipedia:SIG#Must not be used while you're at it. Shep^Talk 22:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Well joseph is a friend of mine and he asked me to help him with an article that he wanted to wright, SFVS, so I helped him out because he is not to hot on the web editing front. With regards to my signature it is starting to annoy me to so i will change it. Thannks Talk «««OisinisiO»»» Talk 22:49, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Geocaching WikiProject

Hello Stepshep, you are invited to participate in WikiProject Geocaching, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Geocaching and similar topics such as Letterboxing. If you would like to join, please visit the members page. Thank you, Rock drum Ba-dumCrash (Driving well?) 12:00, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

American Electric Power

Hi! Just wanted to thank you for replacing the logo on AEP's page on fr: by the SVG version you created. Bouchecl (talk) 00:39, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

No problem. Shep^Talk 01:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:United Way of Canada.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Way of Canada.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

United Way logo

You replaced you own SVG with the PNG. Check the edits. I replaced the old version of that logo with the current one and then resized to suit the new image. The logo does nor require any text. Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Nova logo.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Nova logo.svg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

State seals of Burma

There is a potential copyright problem with the state seals of Burma. Please join the discussion at "commons:Commons talk:Licensing#State seals of Burma". Thanks. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 18:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Longevity COI

A discussion about longevity WP:COI has been initiated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People#End COI. As a recent contributor to this page, your comments are solicited. JJB 20:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC) (Redirected from User talk:ShepBot) JJB 20:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

gary Larson Photo

I don't see why this photo is not OK per wp:NFCC this policy does not seem have any requirements about the author being alive or dead. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 20:39, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

It falls under point 1. This point is elaborated at WP:NFC#UUI, point 1. Shep^Talk 16:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Can I just clarify - do you actually believe that this is a photo of Gary Larson? I'm thoroughly confused. Since it is obviously not him, and is a "real life" representation of his work, why do you believe it falls under that category?[1] a_man_alone (talk) 22:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

No, I do not believe that Gary Larson is a plastic doll. The image, on the other hand, is being used to illustrate the subject (Gary Larson). The subject could be adequately illustrated using an actual photograph of him. Given that Larson is alive it is conceivable that a free use picture could be taken of him. Therefore there is no need to use a non-free image within his article. Shep^Talk 02:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

No, the image is not being used to represent him, because it's not him. It's being used as a visual representation of his work - just as the image before was.[2] It is conceivable that a photo could be taken, but whether such a thing has come to pass is another matter. a_man_alone (talk) 09:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

a_man_alone's objections aside; I think I understand, thank you for clarifying that for me. Voiceofreason01 (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Eagle Outfitters logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Eagle Outfitters logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bankofindia.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bankofindia.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:32, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

Mmmm...Caffeine.

SuperEditor (talk) 18:55, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LondonParalympicLogo2.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LondonParalympicLogo2.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bgcalogo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bgcalogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The September 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 01:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

NRHP Photo Contest

Just a reminder that the WP:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Fall 2011 Photo Contest

will start on Friday, October 21.

Smallbones (talk) 01:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Petco logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Petco logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Derived work

Hello. You created File:Alaska Portal.svg back in the day and even though your work is in the public domain I'd just like to let you know that I have created a derived work from it for the Catalan Wikipedia's Alaska Portal (File:Portal d'Alaska.png). If this is of any incovenience to you or would like to make any comments about this, please do so. Thank you. JaumeBG 22:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Cool. If you decide you'd like an SVG I'd be happy to make one. Just let me know. Shep^Talk 01:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 03:24, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nova (eikaiwa).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nova (eikaiwa).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Groundspeak logo.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Groundspeak logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

File:All London 2012 logos.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:All London 2012 logos.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 21:43, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Nova (eikaiwa).svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Nova (eikaiwa).svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle

Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited

Seattle Public Library

Date Saturday, December 8, 2012 Time 10 a.m. – 3 p.m. Location Seattle Public Library Meeting Room 1 on Level 4, Central Library, 1000 4th Avenue, Seattle WA, 98104 Event An editathon on Seattle-related Wikipedia articles with Wikipedia tutorials and Librarian assistance on hand. Hashtag #wikiloveslib or #glamwiki. Registration http://wll-seattle.eventbrite.com or use on-wiki regsistration. Yours, Maximilianklein (talk) 03:10, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Med

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new non-profit organization we're forming at m:WikiMed. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! Anthonyhcole (talk) 05:07, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cache in Trash out.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Cache in Trash out.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag of the West Indies Federation.svg

I have an OTRS request to change this flag. The request is not very specific, but it does link to the UN exhibit, http://www.unesco-ci.org/photos/showphoto.php/photo/4690/title/the-original-flags-of-the-west-indies-federation/cat/920 which seems to have a slightly lighter blue, and a much redder orange. In other words, it looks more like what the original was, before your color change, but even redder than that. Any objection? Would you be able to do it yourself, as my SVG editing skills are non-existent? --GRuban (talk) 19:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Sure, it looks like it was probably a graphics lab request, but the archive doesn't go back that far. It's just adjusting a number in two lines, so a change is easy enough. Do you have hex values to change it to? Shep^Talk 04:08, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Found the original request, funny to me that the same UNESCO image was mentioned when the colors we asked to be changed... Everything comes full circle. Shep^Talk 04:25, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, everything does come around.

I see that request was based upon the colors in this site, but I just processed an OTRS request from someone associated with the archives in Barbados who claims that the orange is correct, and offered this as a better site. He also sent in a photo of the actual flag form the archives which supports the orange.

I uploaded File:Federal flag West Indies Federation.jpg, but it is a jpg, not an svg. and I see the other image is used many places. Any chance you could revert the svg image to the correct colors?

I'm an Inkscape neophyte, so I don't really know what I am doing. I see you are semi-retired, so I apologize for asking, but this image File:Naval Ensign of the West Indies Federation.svg is also affected.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Ouch, you are indirectly referenced in this TED talk. I hope we can sort this out, and turn lemons into lemonade.

Caution, Christopher says it wasn't properly color balanced, so it looks too red in that video.

Feel free to watch the whole thing, but the reference to the Wikipedia version is early on.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

I changed the colors to match the rbvex site. Are those okay or should the colors match the image you uploaded? Once I know which color combination is preferred the other image is a quick fix as well. Shep^Talk 00:35, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that looks much better. I asked if the person knew the Pantone number of rgb values, but he did not. Thanks for the prompt action.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 00:58, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Apparently someone else was attached to the previous blue. If you need any more changes please feel free to let me know. Shep^Talk 01:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

I don't know whether you fixed the ensign version or that came along for the ride as a derivative, but that's looks fine (to me) as well. I asked the local expert to opine. I hope to hear back in the morning.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 01:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm planning to write to the West Indies Federal Archives Centre. I've attached my draft, but you know more about image specification than I do, so I hoped you could review it before I send it out.

draft wording
padding
Hello, I hope you can help us. My name is Stephen Philbrick, and I am an editor and administrator on the English Wikipedia, plus I volunteer to help answer questions from the public. Recently, someone wrote in to tell us that the colors on the Flag of the West Indies Federation were incorrect. In fact, that gentleman talked abut the problem in a TED lecture, available here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWWb7vA8HfE You may be familiar with that lecture, but if you are not, you may find it very interesting. I've tracked down that the incorrect colors came from a website called Flags of the World http://www.crwflags.com/FOTW/FLAGS/gb-carib.html I wrote to the owner of that website, who confirmed that there was some difficulty tracking down the exact colors of the flag, so he confirmed that the original source was not reliable. I've arranged to have the colors changed, but the there are still some questions about the colors in the current version which can be seen here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_the_West_Indies_Federation The main question is about the color of the sun, and whether it is orange enough. A second question is about the blue, which I have seen as this color, and also in a lighter shade. In some cases, flag colors are specified in legislation, with reference to either Pantone colors, hex color or RGB values. If we get lucky, you might be able to track down whether the colors were specified in legislation, which I would hope you would have in your archives. If that isn't the case, as a second best option, we could match the colors to a photograph of the flag. I understand that you have the actual flag in your possession. While Christopher Laird provided an image, it was taken form a distance, and not a close enough shot to identify the colors clearly. If someone would be willing to take a close-up photo of the flag, we could match the colors very closely, also the best option is to use the colors as specified in legislation. Yet another option is to inquire with the manufacturer of the flag, who may have the colors on record, but I do not know who manufactured the flag. I'm hoping you can help with this, as Wikipedia images are used by many people, and we would like to make sure the colors are correct.

--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:29, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

That looks reasonable. Failing proper legislation the color issue is going to end up being subjective, but good luck looking for an answer! If you get one please let me know and I'll swap things around. Shep^Talk 18:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll let you know if I get an answer.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 18:27, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:OHSAA Logo.png

Thank you for uploading File:OHSAA Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. GrapedApe (talk) 00:02, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Duke Energy Logo

What's your reason for the undo? It's pretty clearly their logo now. --Kchinger (talk) 13:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I updated the SVG to the new logo, then removed the lower quality image. If you don't see that the SVG is now the new logo there might be an issue with either your cache or Wikipedia's. See the updated source in the image file infobox for where I extracted it from. Shep^Talk 15:07, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Got it, I thought that might be it since the file points to the new one but the picture still shows as the old one. Thanks. I'll try clearing my cache. I guess it'll show up right soon.--Kchinger (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I think the problem is that the 200px version which you're referencing is still the old version. You can see this if you go to the file page and click on 200px. I forced cache refreshes for both wikimedia and wikipedia domains and it didn't change. I don't know how the file stuff works very well, but I think that's the problem. How do you make the different size versions? The larger versions are correct, just the 200px is wrong still. Thanks for your help. Kchinger (talk) 15:31, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure why that's happening. Maybe a server is out of sync somewhere? I would expect it to correct itself eventually. I'll check it later today and if it's not fixed I'll ask some other users. Shep^Talk 16:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lund University seal.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lund University seal.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sinuiju.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sinuiju.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

• Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
• Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
• If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 20:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sinuiju.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sinuiju.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:ICANN.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:ICANN.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

About the Chicken Breed Infobox

Hello, sorry to bother you, but I cannot seem to get the infobox's ABA information to show up on the article page. The APA classification will display though. I do not know much on the subject of infoboxes, so perhaps I'm doing something incorrectly? As the Crow Flies (talk) 12:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh, wow. Forgot about that one! Link me the article and I'll see if I can help. Shep^Talk 16:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Here is the link to the Polish article, though I have had this problem with the ABA section in general. I've been attempting to add the infobox to the appropriate articles that are still lacking it (or correct it where it was added, but most of the information was not filled in). Thank you! As the Crow Flies (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The Infobox changed quite a lot since I made it. It's using {{Infobox animal breed}} now. Either way it looks like the classification labels in the template weren't named properly. I changed the Polish article, does it look like what you wanted? Shep^Talk 22:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes, thank you, it looks perfect! How exactly did you do it? You said its under a different format? That would explain some of the problems I've been having. (Sorry I forgot to add the indentation before.) As the Crow Flies (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

It was this diff The template had the line |classification1_label = ABA but then had a bunch of blank |classification1_label = So I just changed the numbers as documented in the Infobox animal breed template.(apparently the overloaded |classification1_label = was causing the template to render improperly) Shep^Talk 23:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I think I understand now. I thank you for your time! As the Crow Flies (talk) 23:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Rebot your boot

Cklim074 has stopped your bot. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:10, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:American Eagle Outfitters logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:American Eagle Outfitters logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heritage-logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heritage-logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:51, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FPL logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FPL logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LMP logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LMP logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lund University seal.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lund University seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ICANN.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ICANN.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity

Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your inactive bot(s)

Hello Stepshep. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one bot account that appears to be inactive. Please see the discussion and list of bots here: Wikipedia:Bot owners' noticeboard#Inactive bots over 5 years. If you are no longer operating your bot, no action is required - your bot will be marked as retired and have the bot flag removed. Should your bot be retired and you wish to revive it in the future, please request bot authorization at WP:BRFA. If you are still in control of your bot (including knowing its hopefully strong password) and wish to maintain the bot flag, please sign the table on the linked discussion. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Stepshep-script-demo.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stepshep-script-demo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 09:13, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, April 2017

Bots Newsletter, April 2017

Greetings! The BAG Newsletter is now the Bots Newsletter, per discussion. As such, we've subscribed all bot operators to the newsletter. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list. Highlights for this newsletter include: Arbcom Magioladitis ARBCOM case has closed. The remedies of the case include: Community encouraged to review common fixes Community encouraged to review policy on cosmetic edits Developers encouraged to improve AWB interface Bot approvals group encouraged to carefully review BRFA scope Reminders/Restrictions specific to Magioladitis BRFAs We currently have 27 open bot requests at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval, and could use your help processing! Discussions There are multiple ongoing discussions surrounding bot-related matters. In particular: RFC on COSMETICBOT Efforts at WP:CHECKWIKI to identify cosmetic fixes Requested move for the Bot Owners' Noticeboard A phabricator ticket T162685 has been made to have a "bots" tag, so issues related to bot frameworks can be tracked New things Several new things are around: A BAG Guide has been created (WP:BAGG, discussion). Users now have the option to hide AWB from their watchlists via a script (WP:HIDEAWB, discussion) The guidance on how to deal with bot issues has been overhauled (WP:BOTISSUE, discussion) The bot policy has been updated to clarify that bot operators are required to register accounts. (WP:BOTACCOUNT, discussion) Wikimania Wikimania 2017 is happening in Montreal, during 9–13 August. If you plan to attend, or give a talk, let us know! Thank you! edited by:Headbomb 11:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC) (You can unsubscribe from future newsletters by removing your name from this list.)

Since you've been inactive for a while, I've removed you from the subscription list. Feel free to re-add yourself to the newsletter if you become active again though. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Petco logo.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Petco logo.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medina Cable Access

The article Medina Cable Access has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 18:47, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:United Way of Canada.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:United Way of Canada.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Lima Stadium.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Lima Stadium.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)