User talk:Rdsmith4

Archives: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10

Leave me a message on this page. If it's urgent or private, send an e-mail instead.

A gate to an alley in Annapolis, Maryland

Nemo of honour: for courageous and constant fight against hideous things (from User:Rama)

I award you the Photographer's barnstar for your Featured Pictures and collection of F1 portraits. — Solipsist 16:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Welcome back!

Welcome back Rdsmith4, long time no see! If you are in need of some of the "lesser" rights related tools feel free to drop me a note - or you can go visit WP:PERM to see what's changed. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 02:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks mate! Hope you've been well. Gosh, the permissions system is quite a bit more fine-grained than I recall. Well, not having them all is already making me itchy, but I think I'll make do for now. :-) Dan 05:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

A belated (so belated you seem to have gone again) welcome back from me. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 14:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Metric football listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Metric football. Since you had some involvement with the Metric football redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 21:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline rulers of Monaco

Template:Timeline rulers of Monaco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Princess Michael

The article Princess Michael has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Princess Michael of Kent is clearly wp:primary. Delete per WP:2DABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Nevé–selbert 18:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Rdsmith4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Timeline Lords of Monaco

Template:Timeline Lords of Monaco has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:22, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:F1 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:F1. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:F1 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ToThAc (talk) 03:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Precious

"I remain entirely attached to the project"

Thank you for quality articles such as Max Mosley, for beginning articles such as Montserrat Caballé and Circuit de Barcelona-Catalunya, fo categories such as Formula One Grands Prix, for service from 2004, including later admin and bureaucrat service, for "I remain entirely attached to the project and committed to its aims", - Dan, repeating (24 October 2008): you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Awesome

Ten years!

and 10 years ago today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rdsmith4. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Cromwell's listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cromwell's. Since you had some involvement with the Cromwell's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 20:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

Newton's listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Newton's. Since you had some involvement with the Newton's redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)