User talk:Meatsgains/Archive 13

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Meatsgains, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

• The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

• On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
• Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Slovakia national bandy team

You can read my comment at Talk:Slovakia national bandy team. Bandy Hoppsan (talk) 22:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

@Bandy Hoppsan: Thanks for the notification. I responded on the talk page. Meatsgains (talk) 01:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sonny arguinzoni

Hello Meatsgains. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sonny arguinzoni, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims importance/significance of the subject. Thank you. SoWhy 07:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

@SoWhy: Thanks for the heads up. Meatsgains (talk) 01:55, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

JackEL article

Hallo,

why did you tagged my article aboud JackEL? What is the problem with it? Can you please give me some advice what to change.

with kind regards Jakabl — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl (talk • contribs) 02:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

See the article's talk page. I responded there. Meatsgains (talk) 02:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

ok. Thanks for your criticism. the article is not finished now. I'm going to work on it the next days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakabl (talk • contribs) 02:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Kevin Wilshaw

Isn't it a little bit odd that after you reviewed the article, it got speedied? Doesn't reviewing it pretty much mean that you made a judgment that it didn't meet any speedy deletion criteria? How then could someone else come along and overturn that judgment?

It would be like if someone removed the speedy tag and then someone else added it back. I thought CSD was only for uncontroversial cases, yet if your judgment differed from someone else's, that means there was a controversy. Smooth alligator (talk) 19:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

When tags are added to new pages through New Pages Feed, they are sometimes automatically marked as "reviewed". So, to answer your question, no I wasn't necessarily saying they article didn't meet speedy deletion criteria. Meatsgains (talk) 01:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	A thanks for withdrawing the recent AfD nom for the 2017–18 Ahmad Shah Abdali 4-day Tournament. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 06:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

@Lugnuts: Thanks, much appreciated! Meatsgains (talk) 16:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Meatsgains, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
• We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

• Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:

• The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm MRD2014. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, M.A.C.A., and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

—MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 02:02, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

@MRD2014: I actually tagged the page for speedy deletion for having no content and it was removed from the page's creator. Meatsgains (talk) 02:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Late reply, but since content was added, I unreviewed it since a re-review was needed. —MRD2014 ^{Talk • Edits • Help!} 12:45, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illusory truth effect

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Illusory truth effect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 06:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illusory truth effect

The article Illusory truth effect you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Illusory truth effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 08:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Wrong data inserted into citation templates

Hi Meatsgains, thanks for fighting linkrot. However, I just ran into an edit [1] where so many things went wrong that it is provoking my comment. In the above mentioned edit you added:

|title=Sony präsentiert E PZ 18–110mm F4 G OSS für Videografen - photoscala|first=About The Author Redaktion|last=photoscala|publisher=

In this example, you erroneously added the publisher (photoscala) to the |title= parameter, but added an empty parameter |publisher= and also added the publisher to the |last= parameter, which is meant for the surname of the author (Vieten), not the publisher. As |first= parameter you added "About The Author Redaktion", which does not make sense at all. This entry should have had the author's forename "Martin". An alternative to specifying the actual name of the author Martin Vieten, it would also have been possible to use the |author= parameter for a string like "photoscala Redaktion". If the author is not mentioned in the article at all, but it is clear that it must have been a staff writer, we typically leave this HTML comment |author=<!-- Staff writer, no byline --> in order to keep future editors from searching for the author name again.

On the cosmetical side, if an article is already using a consistent style for citations, we usually try to maintain this for new entries. In this case, all the older citations had their parameter names prefixed by a space before the pipe symbol (example: " |parameter=xyz"), which creates a more readable flow in narrow edit windows than omitting the space. Old parameter names |first= and |last= are fine in general, but the usage of the more modern |author-first= and |author-last= (with hyphen) is preferred in order to better distinguish them from |editor-first= and |editor-last= parameters.

I haven't checked if this the only example where things went wrong, but please keep in mind that the {{cite}} templates create metadata and are also "harvested" by bots to fill external databases, so it is quite important that parameters don't contain incorrect data. So, please check the data you fill into citations and don't blindly rely on the tools, or the whole effort might be counter-productive... Actually, if you are not sure about some citation data, it is better to just skip the citation and leave it to another editor to fill the gap than inserting incorrect data.

Another suggestion to fight linkrot: Still accessible links should be check for being archived in the Wayback machine (http://www.archive.org) and the archived links be added to our references as well.

Hope it helps. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 12:26, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. The reFill tool clearly botched the format of references. Meatsgains (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Contesting the deletion of the International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because International Society for Stereology & Image Analysis is respectful, non-profit organization, established decades ago and should be introduced to Wikipedia readers. I do not have any conflict of interest. I am the member of the society, but not involved in the management in any way. Members are scientists from all over the world. I will be happy to further explain the issue or modify the article. --Mimag343 (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

I don't doubt that it is a respected non-profit however, there are not enough reliable sources detailing it to establish notability. The page has since been moved to draft space for you to improve before uploading back to the main space. Meatsgains (talk) 17:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

While I agree (and I thank you for the removal) that some content was not encyclopedic enough. Perhaps you missed that recently I added external reliable sources to establish notability (listed as references). Especially important is an independent scientific article on the history of the Society. --Mimag343 (talk) 19:11, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Alison Hartson

Hello Meatsgains

Thank you for notifying me of your proposed deletion of Alison Hartson. I have removed your proposal, made some edits to the article, and wrote an explanation for why we should keep the article in the article's talk page, as you've kindly recommended. I hope we may continue our dialogue in that space.

Best, User:Mattomynameo (talk) 01:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

@Mattomynameo: I've replied on the article's talk page and nominated it page for WP:AfD. Feel free to discuss why you believe the article should keep at the deletion discussion here. Meatsgains (talk) 02:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

@Meatsgains: Greetings! Wow, just wanted to comment that the discussion of the Alison Hartson article really blew up. Thank you for your reasoning during that time. I've been away from wikipedia due to other responsibilities and see that the discussion is long since closed, so I will hold off on re-creating a page for her. If she wins the election, I'll be here writing the article the next morning (if it has not yet been created!) Happy New Years, --User:Mattomynameo (talk)00:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

The AfD discussion certainly took off didn't it? Yes, let's hold off until the election. Should she win, she'll certainly qualify as notable enough for a page. Happy New Year to you too! Meatsgains (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

List of football stadiums in Egypt

Hello Meatsgains I have put the source thanks for reminding me. --Hichem algerino (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks for adding a source! Meatsgains (talk) 02:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphan article

Hi Meatsgains, many thanks for fixing this article Alaa Talbi, you added an Orphan tag to it; I linked it to other wiki-articles. What should I do more ? Thanks in advance. Emnamizouni (talk) 18:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

@Emnamizouni: I removed the orphan tag. Meatsgains (talk) 01:58, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Many thanks Meatsgains :) Emnamizouni (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

OGLE-2016-BLG-1190L

Hello! I made a page called "OGLE-2016-BLG-1190L, but it's impossible to visit the article, since it always redirects to another page called "OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb". What do I do?I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME! (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME!: Looks like Loooke redirected the page to OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb because its about its planet. Meatsgains (talk) 01:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh, hi. The reason I redirected the article to OGLE-2016-BLG-1190Lb was because all of the information in OGLE-2016-BLG-1190L was already included there. Also, people are much more likely to look up the planet than the parent star. Loooke (talk) 01:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Figured I would ping you to provide an explanation. Thanks for the clarification! Meatsgains (talk) 02:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

OK, I guess that the majority of people searching that would be looking for the exoplanet, but what about the people who ARE looking for the STAR? So can you please unredirect it? I-CANT-THINK-OF-USERNAME! (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

That would be a question for Loooke. Meatsgains (talk) 23:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Dan Carrillo

I do have citations, i just don’t know how to properly set them. Could you help me? Dancitofilm (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Here are a few citations. http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jennette-mccurdy-virginia-gardner-little-bitches-1201661873/ https://www.elsiglodetorreon.com.mx/noticia/1290953.estrena-sin-bandera-video-de-sobre-mi-una-colaboracion-con-maluma.html http://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/espectaculos/123403.html https://www.huffingtonpost.com/gregory-weinkauf/hollyshorts-film-festival_b_3774287.html

Can you help me add them? Dancitofilm (talk) 00:16, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy to help. I suggest you read through WP:CITEFOOT, which provides instructions on how to add references. Let me know if you have questions or need additional help. Meatsgains (talk) 00:17, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I did read and did it like that and it appears like this “Empty citation (help)” , I’m new at this, any chance you might help me add them? Thank you so much Dancitofilm (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

The sources you listed to the Variety and Huff Po article do not cover Carillo at all. Meatsgains (talk) 00:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes the variety article talks about Carrillo Producing Little Bitches, and the Hufftington about the release of Zero Hour at the festival Dancitofilm (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I have more Dancitofilm (talk) 00:28, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

This is the direct quote from Variety ““Little Bitches” is currently shooting in Los Angeles with Nick Kreiss directing from his own script. Producers are Scott Aversano, Will Russell-Shapiro, Jorge Garcia, Diego Del Rio, Dom Genest, Dan Carrillo-Levy and Eugenio Villamar” Dancitofilm (talk) 00:29, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Direct quote from the HUfftington post article “Opening night’s block of shorts showcased eight compelling films, kicking off with the new “Zero Hour” by director-producer Dan Carrillo Levy, an intense desert drama written by Guillermo Arriga (Babel), starring Camilla Belle and Jaime Camil. Also, look out! ” Dancitofilm (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Here’s another big reference that I’m trying to add, would love if you could help

https://www.mexico.mx/en/articles/moxie-88-mexican-movie-producers-in-hollywood Dancitofilm (talk) 00:36, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I've added references to the Mexico, Huff Po, and Variety articles but the page is still lacking sources for support. How do you know when he was born and where he went to college? Please read through WP:COI as I'm guessing there is a conflict of interest here. I also trimmed out some of the promotional language. Meatsgains (talk) 01:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I know cause of IMDB. Someone else just deleted it. I thought you added the support. Thanks Dancitofilm (talk) 18:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! Keep up the good work! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Also, I'd suggest trying out the new Rater tool which makes adding wikiprojects to new articles a breeze. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 05:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere: Thanks for the barnstar! I'll be sure to check our the Rater tool. Meatsgains (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

C. F. E. BACH motif

Hello Meatsgains, I need some help. I have created an article about the C. F. E. BACH motif, which has no wiki data item ID, so I can not connect it to the Hungarian article. Could someone help me? Thanks: --Gömb Adél (talk) 08:44, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Bimal Shah

Just a heads up on Bimal Shah. I declined your A1 speedy deletion request because there was plenty of context. A1 is pretty specific in its requirements -- you might want to take a minute to review that.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:28, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barnum effect

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barnum effect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Power~enwiki -- Power~enwiki (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Denomination effect

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Denomination effect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bungle -- Bungle (talk) 20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barnum effect

The article Barnum effect you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barnum effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Power~enwiki -- Power~enwiki (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Meatsgains. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the positive encouragement on the page I created, Utility scam! I really appreciate it. --1440wordpower (talk) 19:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Of course, keep up the good work! Meatsgains (talk) 02:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Normalcy bias

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Normalcy bias you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Are you aware that I started this review already? I am waiting for your response.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 04:20, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

@Farang Rak Tham: Sorry for the delay! It's been a busy week. I also have Denomination effect under review. Since that page was reviewed before Normalcy bias, would you mind giving me a bit more time? I will begin making improvements to Normalcy bias as soon as I am finished up with the other page. Thanks in advance. Meatsgains (talk) 03:01, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Well, we aren't through the first seven days yet. But after that, if you want me to prolong another seven days, you'd have to be a bit more specific as to when you are going to do what. Nice work, those bias series, by the way. You should develop it into a featured series.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 15:53, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I'll try and get Normalcy bias wrapped up here soon and see if I can start working on Denomination effect before the 16th. I'll keep you updated but may request for more time. And thank you! I've created several pages covering biases, some of which were reviewed and declined for GA status as they need quite a bit more work. I'd love to get the series featured - just going to take some time. Meatsgains (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Meatsgains, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

• The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
• Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

• If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

• A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
• Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

• ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
• The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
• To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Duquesne Family Office

The article Duquesne Family Office has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough coverage in reliable independent sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH or GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. James (^talk/_contribs) 18:06, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Illusory truth effect

The article Illusory truth effect you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Illusory truth effect for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wugapodes -- Wugapodes (talk) 23:02, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Normalcy bias

The article Normalcy bias you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Normalcy bias for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Disposition effect

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Disposition effect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 17:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Denomination effect

The article Denomination effect you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Denomination effect for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bungle -- Bungle (talk) 14:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Normalcy bias

The article Normalcy bias you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Normalcy bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Farang Rak Tham -- Farang Rak Tham (talk) 06:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automation bias

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Automation bias you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 06:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jim O'Neill (investor)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CookieMonster755 -- CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jim O'Neill (investor)

The article Jim O'Neill (investor) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jim O'Neill (investor) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CookieMonster755 -- CookieMonster755 (talk) 03:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automation bias

The article Automation bias you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Automation bias for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Georgejdorner -- Georgejdorner (talk) 04:02, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Meatsgains, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1^st and run until January 29^th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

• The total number of reviews completed for the month.
• The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jay Obernolte

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jay Obernolte you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Duquesne Family Office for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duquesne Family Office is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duquesne Family Office until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. James (^talk/_contribs) 13:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jay Obernolte

The article Jay Obernolte you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jay Obernolte for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Hey so just as an FYI on this, my intent was to leave this on hold to see if you had any thoughts in response and also to see if you were going to make any of the suggested changes. I see you've been working on the article but I haven't heard from you at all on the GAN page. Can you let me know what your plans are so I can see if the nom can be placed on hold rather than failed? ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for your patience. The page still needs some cleanup. Once I get around to making the necessary improvements, I'll renominate for GA status. Meatsgains (talk) 01:16, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

No problem. I'll put it back to failed for now. If you want to ping me when you're done, I'd be happy to take a second look so you're not stuck in the review queue for another year. On the other hand if you'd rather someone else do it, I also understand. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:19, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Appreciate it! I'll be sure to ping you as soon as I'm finished. Meatsgains (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jay Obernolte

The article Jay Obernolte you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jay Obernolte for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 17:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Steven R. Jensen

Thanks for reviewing my page, however, it got deleted. I just republished it in a much simpler format as I did get a chance to copy the old page bc it was instantly deleted. Could you take a look at it again, please? Koncurrentkat (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Looks like the page has been reviewed. I'd suggest expanding it and providing additional reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• I would expand it. But I'm afraid it'll just get deleted again. Anything I can do, to avoid deletion?

Koncurrentkat (talk) 13:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

To avoid deletion, provide additional reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability and establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 03:30, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello Dear

This Article Babak Rahnama In-line citations needed, I Added Citations To Article Can You Remove This Tag?????? (In-line citations needed) With Respect Mohammad MohammadRajabloo2 (talk) 02:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

You'll need to add more than one reference for me to remove the tag. Meatsgains (talk) 02:26, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello

Thank you so much for answering ❤❤, I'll be sure to add new References soon. Thanks ❤❤❤❤❤ MohammadRajabloo2 (talk) 09:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

• Meatsgains, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikieditorlove. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

@Drmies: Thanks for the heads up. Meatsgains (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)