User talk:Maury Markowitz/Archives/2012

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

Please consider adding assessment templates

Sure. I mean, adding stuff like now at Talk:Dragonriders of Pern (video game). It is quite important for various other tools, like Wikipedia:Article alerts. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:45, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

For adding them, I do it manually. By now I remember most code, but you can easily check a related page and copy the code from there. It is usually {{WikiProject Name|class=|importance=}}. For WPBIO replace |importance by |living=yes/no. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
No, there's no DYK specific assessment tags. I am pretty sure I meant talk page assessments I noted above. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Ski boot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salomon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

SFN Templates

What are those? None of the citation templates I have seen have all the "bugs" out of them yet, and still produce some odd outputs that do not fully correspond to any bibliographical style guide I know. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:29, 6 January 2012 (UTC). Okay, I took a look at them, and there are critical errors still inherent including using commas instead of periods to separate sections or tracings, something that was changed 30 years ago in reference cataloguing, as well, the same butchered APA style is still being used, which does not accommodate multiple authors well, or later editions, or ... and on and on. I have still to be convinced that the template designs can't be changed but no one seems willing to take that on. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2012 (UTC).

FYI - Binding images

Commons OTRS obviously had (and still has) a huge backlog - your images have been confirmed now. See File:Look_Nevada_binding.jpg et al. --Denniss (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hanson Industries (ski boots), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nordica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

See Canadian Parliamentary Motion 37/1-1205

Hi M, sorry to drag you into this sordid mess, but the comments made by one of the participants have now "gone over the edge" and are very similar to the mIckMac syndrome of another Wiki editor. This is now beyond WP:Tendentious editing and is symptomatic of an uncivil editor, who needs at the very least, a "slap on the wrists." A number of ANIs have been started but various admins have shied away from the issue of conduct because of the "positive" record of contributions, yet, the editor has left a illuminating record of confrontations and arbitrary actions that belie this contention that a valuable contributor is at work. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

To be more specific, the editor in question has previously derided other editors who opposed his/her actions with comments such as others "just show up and scrawl an X with a crayon", and was asked to moderate his comments, then continued with calling out those that opposed the arbitrary merge and move actions as "cranks." I know this sounds petty but the MO revolves around similar behaviour as well as triggering a number of ANI requests. FWiW, the issue is not the content canard, it is WP:Uncivil conduct. Bzuk (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC).
I've crossed paths before. But I prefer to interpret this as "amusing grumpiness" as opposed to "disruptive badass". That's because I hope people return the favour! Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I think you're right and I construed a lot of the diatribe as being convoluted and disingenuous, more tactics than outright nastiness. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 21:46, 12 January 2012 (UTC).

Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight

Please see Talk:Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight -- PBS (talk) 21:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Current–voltage characteristic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fill factor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Schwede66's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Hanson Industries (ski boots)

The DYK project (nominate) 16:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: Confused about this...

Hi there,

It's nothing to worry about really - it's just that once you have had five articles featured on Did You Know, you are required to review another nomination each time you nominate one. As you've had less than five articles featured, you didn't need to review another nomination - so I thought it was best to mention this in the review in case another editor swung by and thought you'd missed reviewing another article (thus delaying your nomination by mistake). Miyagawa (talk) 17:14, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Rosemount Ski Boots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salomon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

About your incomplete DYK nomination

Hi, in response to your edit summary, no. The "Incomplete DYK nomination" notification above refers to the fact that you neglected to transclude your nomination of Lange (ski boots) on Template talk:Did you know. I've done it for you now, but please remember to do it for any further nominations. Without doing so, no one will ever see your nomination, so it can't be approved and promoted. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 23:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Gee

Please see Talk:Gee_(navigation)#TR 1335 -- PBS (talk) 01:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Rosemount Ski Boots

The DYK project (nominate) 08:04, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

DYK for Lange (ski boots)

Orlady (talk) 10:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Elan SCX, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slalom and Salomon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Lange

Are you sure "thigh" is correct? "Calf" would seem more likely. Ericoides (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK review

Could you please review my DYK nomination for Edin Osmanović? Thanks, --Khanassassin   21:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

DYK for Elan SCX

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Lotus Improv Financials example.PNG

 

Thank you for uploading File:Lotus Improv Financials example.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited L64/65, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M16 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Raichle Flexon

  Hello! Your submission of Raichle Flexon at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! LauraHale (talk) 00:27, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Lange Super Blaster 120 2012.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lange Super Blaster 120 2012.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Spademan 900 ski boot.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Spademan 900 ski boot.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Spademan 900 ski boot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spademan 900 ski boot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:09, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Spademan bindings.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Spademan bindings.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

nForce

Hello. You asked a question about nforce chipsets on my talk page. HyperTransport is in no way deprecated. It's still used by the latest Athlon, Phenom, Sempron and FX (aka Bulldozer) CPU's. The 700 and 900 series chipsets for AMD are indeed a few years old, but they support the highest HT 3.0 bus speed of the latest AM3+ CPU's. For a new computer nForce + AMD CPU is still a good option. The latest AMD AM3(+) CPU's except Fusion are still 100% compatible with older chipsets going back to some nForce3 models, at least if your motherboard and BIOS support the CPU you want to use. Fusion CPU's only work with special chipsets from AMD (A55, A75, etc. aka Hudson). I can recommend you the Asrock M3N78D motherboard, or M3N78D FX if you want to use an FX CPU. If you want to use SLI, there's the Asus M4N98TD series but they're a bit expensive. But of course other manufacturers have nForce boards as well.

nForce + Intel, however, is horribly outdated. After the Core 2 series Intel wanted to make all chipsets theirselves - that way nvidia could only produce chipsets for old LGA 775 CPU's. The DMI bus used by Core i (and Celeron/Pentium derivatives) is supported by Intel chipsets only. Fortunately AMD hasn't switched to a new bus. If they're ever going to do that I'm afraid nvidia will disappear from the chipset market. Since the merge with ATI, NVIDIA is a concurrent of AMD. Albert Pool (talk) 10:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

HT is the only bus that can be used to connect 754/939/AM2/AM3 CPU's to the chipset. It's used by all brands of chipsets, not just nForce, another way of connecting a chipset does not even exist in those CPU's. AMD might replace HT with UMI, which they have already introduced in the Fusion, but for Athlon/Phenom/Sempron this won't happen until 2013. But they'll also have to replace socket AM3 when doing so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albert Pool (talkcontribs) 14:23, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
 
Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

AppleTalk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Phone jack, Control panel and Router
Peripheral bus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Printer and PCI
Zilog SCC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to SDLC and NMOS
Bus (computing) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Printer
Lange (ski boots) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Nordica
NuBus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to S-100

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quasi Universal Intergalactic Denomination

As a contributor to this article, you may be interested to know I have nominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi Universal Intergalactic Denomination. Robofish (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Giulio Douhet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Walther Wever
Overdrive (mechanics) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Fuel economy
Strategic bombing survey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to President Roosevelt
YLC-15 Radar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Chinese

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. When you recently edited Napier Nomad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuel economy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

Template:Did you know nominations/Patterns of Conflict

Hi, I just reviewed this nomination and would have passed it except ... Google Books will not show me the relevant pages of the Coram book that reference the hook. So as I've asked there, could you quote the necessary bits so I can establish that the hook is supported? Yngvadottir (talk) 19:14, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

DYK for Patterns of Conflict

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited AppleTalk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PPP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. When you recently edited Document Content Architecture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mainframe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Edit of Škoda 15 T

Hello Maury,

although your edit is useful and has simplified the text, I believe that essential information was lost - as regards the defficiencies of 14T and the pecularities of the tramway track, which led to the development of 15T. I don't want to start an edit war, hence I would like to ask you to re-edit it in a way that would re-introduce this information, without making the text too complicated as it had been before. Thank you, regards Cimmerian praetor (talk) 15:43, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Talk:1977 Chicago Loop derailment.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. When you recently edited Cineston controller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Air brake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

April 2012

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz/Archives. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2012 (UTC).

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Omega (navigation system) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to DME and VOR
Noorduyn Norseman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Streamlining

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

DYK for Orfordness Beacon

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

Edward Fennessy DYK nomination issue

  Hello! Your submission of Edward Fennessy at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Maile66 (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Fennessy

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Sonne (navigation)

Maury, I wanted to note that your nomination of this article has been awaiting a response from you for over a week, just in case it isn't on your watchlist. Please stop by as soon as you can. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Midnight at the Well of Souls

Can you have a look at Midnight at the Well of Souls, you added a sentence that appears as a typo "the the" but could have multiple meanings. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

DYK for Sonne (navigation)

Thank you from the DYK team at Wikipedia Graeme Bartlett (talk) 18:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

It's featured on the DYK of Portal:Germany! If you have more DYK related to Germany, feel free to add there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

Non-free rationale for File:PackIt III icon.gif

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PackIt III icon.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

FullWrite Professional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hyphenation
Well World series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Clone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Cap'n Magneto splash screen.png

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cap'n Magneto splash screen.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:57, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

DYK for Minitram

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

  The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
Congrats on getting to 100 DYKs. :) LauraHale (talk) 20:11, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. When you recently edited Gunpowder engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clearnet Communications, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

Re. Moore Creek (Nipissing District)

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz. You have new messages at Qui1che's talk page.
Message added 15:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

Non-free rationale for File:PackIt III icon.gif

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:PackIt III icon.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:21, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:DiskDoubler icon.gif

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:DiskDoubler icon.gif. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:14, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bedrock (framework), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Development environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Free Software Congress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pulse detonation engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fuel economy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 8 November 2012 (UTC)


Edits on NIF

Hi Maury,

I've seen your edits and generally do not object however I feel that the following two paragraphs you edited out really bring some interesting details. Could we put them back in? Thanks

Aneutronik (talk) 10:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

In a 2012 interview[105] Dr Mike Dunne, LLNL Director for Laser Fusion Energy acknowledges that the control of these hydrodynamic instabilities is key to the success of NIF, which he confidently predicts within 6–18 months of February 2012. These Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities have obviously been underestimated, based on the output of the simulations used to design NIF.

One must bear in mind that these experiments, where the surface layer of an ablator is sublimed by X-rays, is directly inspired by that of hydrogen bombs. In the case of a fusion bomb the thickness of the ablator is sufficient to mitigate the hydrodynamic instabilities but in the case of the NIF capsule the thickness is insufficient and hydrodynamic instabilities cause some mixing of ablator material with capsule fuel, which hinders ignition. Further in the memo, the reviewers suggest to increase the shell thickness, but this increases its inertia. To keep the required implosion speed, they request that the NIF energy be increased to 2MJ. One must also keep in mind that neodymium lasers can withstand only a limited amount of energy or risk explosion. Some reviewers question whether or not the energy of NIF is sufficient to indirectly compress a large enough capsule to avoid the mix limit and reach ignition. (Crandall Memo 2012, p. 5)

Hey Aneutronik,

I removed the first of the two paras because it basically said something that was no longer true - it was Moses' prediction of ignition in the short term, essentially just a progress report about the ongoing LIFE project at that time. If this was February then an up-to-date statement about the status of the effort is definitely worth including, but that was a better part of a year ago and the statement simply isn't true any more. Am I missing something here?

The second one has a single useful bit of information in it, the statement about the thickness of the ablator. This is now mentioned in passing in the historical section, see the new reference from Nuckolls. The rest of that para is not factual - the lasers do not risk explosion AFAIK, but etching, and whether or not the laser has enough energy is well covered throughout. I believe this para is also "out of place" and suggest a statement specifically about ablator thickness tradeoffs in the description area, far up the page.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:40, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Maury,

Re: the first paragraph, indeed Mike Dunne's prediction did not come true and we are still to hear what the new predictions will be (or news that he and John Lindl are leaving NIF?) https://pppl-edit.princeton.edu/events/new-results-national-ignition-facility-dr-john-lindl-lawrence-livermore-national-laboratory Quite clearly the Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities have been underestimated but you may want to prefer to wait for the official announcement of failure in Deeney's report to congress Nov 30?

Re: the second paragraph is an attempt at explaining what went wrong on NIF. Here also you may want to wait for Nov 30 but in a nutshell: 1) Centurion-Halite said 10MJ (thick capsule) 2) this is unattainable with current laser technology 3) it was predicted that ignition would be possible with a thin capsule (and current laser technology) 4) this is obviously wrong due to Rayleigh-Taylor 5) so now what do we do with NIF?

So in my opinion the question of shell thickness is key to understand what went wrong, and why so much money was wasted.

By the way laser glass chambers do explode(or at least gets shattered into glass splinters), usually due to a default in the manufacturing but here this is the limiting factor in each laser power (using current glass technology)

Aneutronik (talk) 12:33, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

I take your point on the timeline. I need to take a bit of time to think about what's best and what to add (with minimal rewrite). If my edits have helped those who wonder why NIF did not work, I'm happy. If someone in the know knows better (and tells us) then I'm happy to be proven wrong. In the end we need fusion if at all practical: NIF, ITER or Z machine... What we do not need is politicians who manipulate data in order to raise big budgets and build large useless facilities. Not all real science experiments are multi-billion $

Aneutronik (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Inertial confinement fusion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Los Alamos and Atomic Energy Commission
S3 Graphics (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to ATI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reduced instruction set computing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Router (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ball-and-disk integrator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Integration
Torque amplifier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Capstan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Servo
Torque amplifier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Prime mover

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

DYK nomination of torque amplifier

  Hello! Your submission of torque amplifier at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Maury, there are additional issues, now that you've added the new article. Please check the nomination page for details. Thanks! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Drawing evidence for Me 210 vs. Me 410 differences

Dear Maury:

The PIPE Here again, after some years away (since the late summer of 2007!) from last contacting you !!

I compared the Wikipedia scale drawing at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Me_210_w_trzech_rzutach.jpg on the Messerschmitt Me 210 to a relatively GOOD one of the Me 410 Hornisse at http://www.airwar.ru/image/idop/fww2/me410/me410-1.gif , and the GLARING differences in the wing planform between the 210 and Hornisse, as I had mentioned to you from way back in 2007, are readily apparent when I saved copies of each wing planform on my hard disk and compared them to each other, within my copy of Corel Photo-Paint 12 earlier this morning.

This would be a perfect DesignCAD project for Wikipedia as it seems that it's never been seriously documented before, and as I already told you about how there had to be a similar wing redesign (but in reverse!) for the famous Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik when it became a two-seat ground attack aircraft versus the earlier single-seat design, I'd be doing a DesignCAD project over the coming weeks (or perhaps a month or two) to produce both an SVG file for the Me 410 based on the Russian scale drawing (but a bit different in how the aircraft's views are presented using DesignCAD for my own copyright on them, to be submitted to Wikipedia as my own work from the DesignCAD drawing environment) and a comparison file between the 210 and 410, to more clearly show that glaring difference between the Me 210's "rearwards" located aerodynamic centered wing, and the Hornisse's "more-forward" aerodynamic centered wing that led to its better handling.

I've just got to figure out HOW to easily produce a scalable SVG vector drawing file from the DesignCAD work, that's all...between my complete Corel Graphics Suite 12, the DesignCAD software, and whatever "open source" graphic software that might be needed to do it, I'm SERIOUSLY going to try to get those two SVG files for Wikipedia going over this winter, to finally lay to rest the doubt you seem to have had about the Me 210's wing being as different from the 410's wing layout from several years ago.

Hope to hear from you when time's available...

The PIPE (talk) 14:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

DYK nomination of Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight

  Hello! Your submission of Stabilized Automatic Bomb Sight at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

 

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Brands

 
Hello, Maury Markowitz.

You are invited to join WikiProject Brands, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of brands and brand-related topics.

To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:50, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ohio Scientific, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SRAM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

Template:Did you know nominations/torque amplifier

Maury, there was a problem with the length of the hook for this nomination when it was just re-reviewed—it was over 200 characters, which is a hard and fast ceiling. I've proposed a rewording that takes it down to 196 characters, but we need you to check it to be sure it's still accurate. Please stop by and let us know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)