Madeforall1

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:16, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hello, I have noticed that you have made a number of unnecessary links to Wikipedia pages. Please read WP:OVERLINK regarding use of essential links. Regards and thanks, David J Johnson (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Madeforall1! Your additions to Dumo Lulu Briggs have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 23:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

DJ Phil Baddest moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to DJ Phil Baddest. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

DJ Phil Baddest moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to DJ Phil Baddest. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Hello Madeforall1. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Madeforall1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Madeforall1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jamiebuba (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Buike moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Buike. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited JZyNO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

JZyNO moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to JZyNO. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:JZyNO has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:JZyNO. Thanks! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 12:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Phil Baddest

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DJ Phil Baddest requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Instigator Ph moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Instigator Ph. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Instigator Ph (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Instigator Ph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Madeforall1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:35, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Madeforall1, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Madeforall1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:42, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I’m not been paid for edits and I’m not affiliated with the subjects, these are people i know through social media and his music Madeforall1 (talk) 15:10, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Also I create articles for the love I have for Wikipedia and when I see people in the media space that are reaching some heights, I try to create an article for them, I can decide to create an article for someone I really like and can talk about not for everyone, making edits is a personal decision based on the information you can get, my interest is seeing that my articles are live and existing on Wikipedia. So if my article gets reviewed it makes me happy. Madeforall1 (talk) 15:26, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Knowing them "through social media" is also a clear Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:01, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I’ve heard about them some many times, his music and so on, the articles I created is out of my choice, and if you check my contributions I normally patrol on any article I come across, so I pled you undo the deletion tag please. My joy is for my article to be live as I won’t create articles without references from news sources. Madeforall1 (talk) 22:08, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

I also saw a mail that you have reviewed the article and same time saw you nominated it for deletion, that was rather not fair, try helping to develop the article and it’s good that way. But like I said I don’t have any paid agreement seriously. Madeforall1 (talk) 22:32, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Buike for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Buike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jamiebuba (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emotionality, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Instigator Ph has been accepted

Instigator Ph, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance. Madeforall1 (talk) 06:14, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

How did you get a personal photo of Instigator Ph? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

I saw it on social media please, hope all is fine? His a public figure so getting photo is not difficult. Madeforall1 (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@Madeforall1, I came here to ask you this also; do you think adding the personal photo of him would increase his notability or did he send it to you? Best, Reading Beans (talk) 00:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Almost all articles of a living person has a picture, hope it’s cool as I added it Madeforall1 (talk) 01:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

I’m not connected to the subject, I just saw the picture from social media, thanks Madeforall1 (talk) 01:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Madeforall1, my concern is that, you just said you got the picture from social media, but you ended up licensing it as "Own work", pet Commons policies, this means that you took the picture yourself, which is not the case here.

I bet the picture would be tagged for a deletion discuss and subsequently deleted because you won't be able to prove that you own the work.

From another view, when uploading a picture via Wikimedia Commons UploadWizard, the wizard has very user friendly interface that would help you choose the best license for your file, especially if it's not your "Own work". It'll also let know if you can't upload any picture or file to the project and why.

I'd advise you go through relevant policies on commons to be fully aware.

Hope this helps. Regards. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Also, if you got it from social media, what is the link to the site you retrieved the image from? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:46, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Here is the the link “https://www.instagram.com/p/CjgrgR0Nv6F/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==” Madeforall1 (talk) 22:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Maybe I didn’t use the right license Madeforall1 (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Date formatting

See MOS:DATEVAR. Please do not change any more "November 18, 1951"-style dates in articles on American subjects. That format is correct in such articles. Also, "18 November, 1951" with a comma in it is not a valid date format at all (it's "18 November 1951" in British and most other non-American articles).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you so much for the notice Madeforall1 (talk) 08:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jnr Choi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Instigator Ph for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Instigator Ph is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instigator Ph until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mastashat (talk) 07:10, 8 December 2023 (UTC)