Lekkala R Reddy
Lekkala R Reddy, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Lekkala R Reddy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 24) edit
Warning edit
You have asked about your draft, by my count, now at five different places (the Teahouse, CactusWriter's talk page, Jimbo's talk page, and two different threads on the AfC help desk). This is not an invitation to add mine to that list. Repeatedly asking the same question in different places, after already having received an answer, is considered forum shopping and a type of disruptive behavior. In all those cases, you have received a clear "no" from quite a few experienced editors. I realize that you disagree, but I'm afraid that's still the answer. Perhaps the notability of this individual can be reevaluated in a year or two, if additional source material is available, but the community has, at this point, clearly decided that at this point, the reference material is not sufficient. I took a look, and for the record, I agree with them; the individual seems primarily to have been covered for one event, a Saudi Arabian video, and only briefly been name-dropped or quoted, not the in-depth type of material that's required. So, at this point, it's time to drop it, at least for now, on this one. Find something else to write about, and revisit this after a year or two's passed. (You'll have more experience editing by then, too.) If you exhaust people's patience, the result will not be that we throw up our hands and let you proceed, it will be that we throw up our hands and block you from editing. That is not the outcome I'd like to see, and probably not the one you'd like either. So, for now, please find something else to write about; maybe edit existing articles before you jump into trying to create a new one. You are not headed anywhere good with the way you're currently going. Seraphimblade Talk to me 23:22, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Lekkala R Reddy/sandbox edit
A tag has been placed on User:Lekkala R Reddy/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Recreation of deleted draft by User:Lekkala R Reddy
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 03:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived edit
|
|
Hi Lekkala R Reddy! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived edit
|
|
Hi Lekkala R Reddy! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
AfC notification: User:Lekkala R Reddy/sandbox has a new comment edit
Articles for Deletion edit
Hi Lekkala R Reddy - you seem to have nominated three articles for deletion: Anurag Chauhan, Dharmatma Saran, Anuja Trehan Kapur without giving any explanation. It is an essential part of the AFD process that you advance some argument for deletion. I would suggest that you return to the relevant AFDs for each of these pages as soon as possible and add in an explanation for why you believe they should be deleted, otherwise your nominations run the risk of simply being closed as a speedy keep. Hugsyrup 12:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Hugsyrup, I believe these article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 13:14, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
- That's fine, but you need to make that case at the Articles for Deletion pages, not here. Hugsyrup 13:51, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi Hugsyrup, Sure will do. Give me some hours. M driving! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 14:00, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
I have made the comments on these pages. Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 15:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
July 2019 edit
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Karmaveer Chakra Award, from its old location at User:Lekkala R Reddy/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:35, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Karmaveer Chakra Award has been accepted edit
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Missvain (talk) 20:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Thankyou so much Missvain
Best Regards, Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kundan Srivastava edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kundan Srivastava requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kundan Srivastava (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - FitIndia Talk Admin on Commons 14:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Kundan Kumar Srivastava moved to draftspace edit
An article you recently created, Kundan Kumar Srivastava, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kundan Kumar Srivastava (May 7) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Kundan Kumar Srivastava (May 7) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hatchens (talk) 11:05, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 edit
Hello, Lekkala R Reddy. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Kundan Kumar Srivastava has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see User:Deepfriedokra/promo for examples of content to avoid. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles. A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.
New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE
--Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:55, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Plurals Party edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Plurals Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plurals Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 14:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pushpam Priya Choudhary (July 9) edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pushpam Priya Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pushpam Priya Choudhary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The following draft needs review because it was submitted over 3 weeks ago:
Enzo Enzo
Nomination of Pushpam Priya Choudhary for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushpam Priya Choudhary, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpam Priya Choudhary (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
July 2022 edit
Hello Lekkala R Reddy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lekkala R Reddy. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lekkala R Reddy|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:39, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hello PRAXIDICAE,
- I am a software engineer by profession ... I have been contributing articles on Wikipedia according to my interest and by following Wikipedia guidelines. All the articles contributed by me according to my interest and knowledge which is free of cost ..Mayyou get an impression from the nature of my edits that I have a financial stake in promoting a topic is baseless ..Kindly see my article contribution in past ..I mostly cover topics related to Social, Entrepreneurships, Politics
- When I contributed an article yesterday, I found 3 articles related to that article within the topic and I contributed all three articles. You may have thought but I found links and authencity between all three articles and it is related to each other, then I contributed by own.
- I follow all Wikipedia rules & guidelines, and will do in the future too.
- Thankyou! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 04:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of SHEROES edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on SHEROES, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 TT me 12:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest edit
Hello, Lekkala R Reddy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page PokerBaazi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:B2:E78F:D941:91E1:6047:3324 (talk) 10:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello,
- I don't have a conflict of interest, yes, I am a customer and do play online games here. I am Wikipedia contributor helps always to generate informative content about organizations and social content. I have made changes as you suggested.
- Thankyou! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 10:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022 edit
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to PokerBaazi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. 2A01:4C8:B2:E78F:D941:91E1:6047:3324 (talk) 11:44, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Dear,
- I have removed all the unreliable sources just now. Check all the media sources are authentic now.
- Thankyou! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 11:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- All of the sourced supplied, with the possible exception of the LiveMint article, are press releases. Please see WP:SELFPUBLISHED and WP:CHURNALISM: press releases are not reliable sources, even if they are published in a national newspaper. 2A01:4C8:B2:E78F:D941:91E1:6047:3324 (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Sir,
- I have just added more reliable sources with the authentic sentences. Kindly check and do the needful.
- Thankyou! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 06:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- All of the sourced supplied, with the possible exception of the LiveMint article, are press releases. Please see WP:SELFPUBLISHED and WP:CHURNALISM: press releases are not reliable sources, even if they are published in a national newspaper. 2A01:4C8:B2:E78F:D941:91E1:6047:3324 (talk) 12:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Sir,
- I am an IT Engineer having 10+ years of experiences and contributing article on Wikipedia since a long ...Please understand the dignity of mine. This article haven't created or edited in return for undisclosed payments. By god blessings I have money for myself and I don't earn for the name of information and education.
- Thankyou! Lekkala R Reddy (talk) 11:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of PokerBaazi edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on PokerBaazi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PokerBaazi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 28 December 2022 (UTC)