User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 82

Archive 75

←

Archive 80

Archive 81

Archive 82

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
154		Volcanic bomb (talk)	Add sources
1,219		Pyroclastic flow (talk)	Add sources
2,075		Andes (talk)	Add sources
72		Puyehue-Cordón Caulle (talk)	Add sources
2,060		Pleistocene (talk)	Add sources
5		Wilson Rock (talk)	Add sources
218		Holocene climatic optimum (talk)	Cleanup
426		Hafiz Saeed (talk)	Cleanup
53		Seismicity (talk)	Cleanup
275		Non-lethal weapon (talk)	Expand
29		Nevado del Tolima (talk)	Expand
135		Tungurahua (talk)	Expand
358		Hill sphere (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
77		Brightness temperature (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
337		Space-based solar power (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
109		Bølling–Allerød warming (talk)	Merge
989		Pilgrimage (talk)	Merge
162		Wildcard certificate (talk)	Merge
25		Tollmann's bolide hypothesis (talk)	Wikify
123		Migmatite (talk)	Wikify
50		Cold Bay, Alaska (talk)	Wikify
2		Leticia Carigi (talk)	Orphan
2		Anandasramam, Changanacherry (talk)	Orphan
2		Assetline (talk)	Orphan
1		TulTul, Del Medio and Pocitos (talk)	Stub
15		Aguas Calientes (volcano) (talk)	Stub
10		Huambo volcanic field (talk)	Stub
15		Zapaleri (talk)	Stub
3		Kostakan (talk)	Stub
3		Abra Granada (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Edinburgh on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Excellent decision, based on a fair assessment of due weight. Have a good week! ——Serial Number 54129 12:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of Mount Hudson

Congratulations, Jo-Jo Eumerus! The article you nominated, Mount Hudson, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

• News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections

• Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?

• Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24

• In the media: Deadnames on the French Wikipedia, and a duel between Russian wikis

• Op-Ed: Wikidata to split as sheer volume of information overloads infrastructure

• Comix: Generations

• Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
189		South Sandwich Islands (talk)	Add sources
80		Eruption column (talk)	Add sources
912		Lake (talk)	Add sources
33		Moraine-dammed lake (talk)	Add sources
64		Hawaiian eruption (talk)	Add sources
189		Scoria (talk)	Add sources
45		Cytochrome P450 (individual enzymes) (talk)	Cleanup
396		Plain (talk)	Cleanup
47		Ambrym (talk)	Cleanup
91		Villarrica (volcano) (talk)	Expand
119		Estancia, New Mexico (talk)	Expand
51		Starspot (talk)	Expand
86		Antofagasta Region (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
361		Language change (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3		Banksieaephyllum (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
267		IM-1 (talk)	Merge
58		Running up the score (talk)	Merge
544		Norfolk Southern Railway (talk)	Merge
22		Subboreal (talk)	Wikify
12		Skeena Mountains (talk)	Wikify
155		Environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries (talk)	Wikify
4		Jorge H. Capdevila (talk)	Orphan
3		Buga Wood Pavilion (talk)	Orphan
2		CCAP Rhode Island (talk)	Orphan
19		Khakassian Che (talk)	Stub
7		Copiapó (volcano) (talk)	Stub
26		Slab (geology) (talk)	Stub
7		Cerro Bravo (talk)	Stub
136		Phosphophyllite (talk)	Stub
12		Acotango (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of El Negrillar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Negrillar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review question

Hi! I hope this message finds you well. I'm writing a piece for the signpost and came across this 2016 AFD for Margaret Nichols which you closed as delete. I believe there were a few issues with it (not your role in it) which I think merit a review by yourself and/or other admins.

• The article was previously nominated at AFD in 2011 by User:James Cantor, whose colleagues had been criticized by Nichols in the past. There was no other support for a delete with multiple editors thinking it passed GNG and it was categorized as a USA, Sex and Gender, behavioral science, and author - related discussion.
• The 2016 AFD was created by a sock of Cantor (discovered in 2021), was only listed under academic-related discussions, and apart from himself only received two supports.

I'm unsure if the article did pass GNG (I can't see the history) so would like your opinion on 1) whether it might have been deleted unduly and 2) what to do in that case (would you undelete it, draftify it, take it to DRV, etc). Best regards, Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I don't remember if back in the day I would consider 3 or 4 delete !votes (i.e if we treat Cantor and their sock as one account) as sufficient for a deletion. The sources are her own profile and articles that quote her without delving too deep in her as a person. The deletion was 8 years ago and 3-4 delete arguments is a low number. Are there more recent sources, say biographies about her or things that discuss her in some detail? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

I think so, I'm not so used to writing articles on academics so I'm not sure whether the comments in the original AFD about passing WP:NPROF held (and whether the article met criteria during the first AFD and was edited so it no longer did during the second).

• She's given TEDX talks and presented at conferences in the last few years[1][2]
• She's seems to have hundreds of citations from a check of google scholar
• This source says By far, the pioneer in this field [lesbian sex therapy] is Margaret Nichols, who has been writing about the subject since the 1980s. but I'm struggling to gain access to the rest of the text. [3]
• This one on p 27 says that in the 90s and early 2000s Nichols "developed proposals of more queer approaches in sex therapy" and discusses their POV in relation to mainstream sex therapy. [4]
• This source puts her book in a recommended reading section and describes her as a key pioneer working with LGBTQ+ clients with over 40 years of experience. Her book embraces current thinking on working with a wide range of clients [5][6]
• This goes into her views on sadomasochism[7]
• This discusses the politicization of AIDS, quotes Nichols, and notes she's the director of the Hyacinth Foundation, which was contracted to provide AIDS relief in New Jersey.[8]

I don't have time for more research tonight, but AFAICT she's incredibly highly cited when it comes to sex therapy, particularly for lesbian couples, and has been for decades. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Black War on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

• News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation publishes its Form 990 for fiscal year 2022-2023

• Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade

• Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor

• In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say

• News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024

• Opinion: Public response to the editors of Settler Colonial Studies

• Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth

• Featured content: We didn't start the wiki

• Essay: No queerphobia

• Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!

• Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer

• Comix: The Wikipediholic Family

• Humour: Wikipedia rattled by sophisticated cyberattack of schoolboy typing "balls" in infobox

• Concept: Palimpsestuous

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:26, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Opinion

Hi Jo-Jo, hope all’s well. Could you possibly take a look at the Holden Commodore (VE) article to see which sources you’d consider unreliable and reliable? Since late last year i’ve been think of bringing back this article to FA status (it’s a former FA) but still am not sure about the sourcing. Best, 750h+ 15:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I don't do source reviews outside of FAC, usually, but if it matters, here's a few sources that make me wonder "what makes this a high-quality reliable source?"

• GoAuto.
• CarsGuide
• Carsales
• Which Car?
• Holden Special Vehicle.

Other sources didn't give much indication, but may need closer checking. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of El Negrillar

The article El Negrillar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:El Negrillar for comments about the article, and Talk:El Negrillar/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations, and thank you today for Incapillo, "about a volcanic caldera in the central Andes. It is not particularly remarkable or well-known, but it has been described as one of the highest of its kind - and so are the mountains that surround it. It was active during the past 520,000 years and there might be residual heat available."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

KNXV FAC

I replied to your source review comments when you have a chance. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC)