Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jerrypop2a, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 00:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard R. Kratz (January 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lee Vilenski was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Jerrypop2a! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 14:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Howard R. Kratz

edit
 

Hello, Jerrypop2a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Howard R. Kratz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 07:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Howard R. Kratz

edit
 

Hello, Jerrypop2a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Howard R. Kratz.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Perry B. Ritter moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Perry B. Ritter, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 01:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ed A. Day

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Ed A. Day requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

{{db}} No Citations

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tatupiplu'talk 08:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Project Orion physicists

edit

I see a number of recently created article on physicists belonging to this category; all of them in their present state are inviting a speedy deletion request since there is not only no clear claim of notability but there is not a single source. This is lazy editing: if you want these articles to survive you should add some real content including some indication of why they are notable and YOU SHOULD INCLUDE CITATIONS. On the other hand, at least the articles are about sa topic that is of some encyclopedic value, rather kick-the-ball players or wannabee rappers.TheLongTone (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Prater

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ron Prater for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:26, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Mixson

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Don Mixson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fred Gorschboth

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fred Gorschboth for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bob Duffield

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bob Duffield for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John Dishuck

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Dishuck for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlo Riparbelli

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Carlo Riparbelli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Lois Illes

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lois Illes for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of John Illes

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Illes for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:29, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of William(Bill) G. Vulliet

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged William(Bill) G. Vulliet for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Walt England

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Walt England for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Fred W. Ross

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fred W. Ross for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuck C. Loomis

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Chuck C. Loomis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:30, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of J. R. Pope

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged J. R. Pope for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:31, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of W. B. McKinney

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged W. B. McKinney for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Leon Dial

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Leon Dial for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of R. N. House

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged R. N. House for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim W. Morris

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jim W. Morris for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael J. Feeney

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Michael J. Feeney for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Menley Young

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Menley Young for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Reed Watson

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reed Watson for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard D. Morton

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Richard D. Morton for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike R. Ames

edit

Hello Jerrypop2a,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mike R. Ames for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 16:34, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Perry B. Ritter moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Perry B. Ritter, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. creffett (talk) 00:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Micheal Treshow V

edit
 

The article Micheal Treshow V has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. creffett (talk) 02:50, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Micheal Treshow V moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Micheal Treshow V, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. creffett (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rudy A. Cesena

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rudy A. Cesena requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 05:02, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ralph Stahl

edit
 

The article Ralph Stahl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sourced only to WP:UGC & created by a sockpuppet, this article lacks credibility.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Howard R. Kratz

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Howard R. Kratz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hendersonvillelightning.com/obituaries/227-howard-r-kratz-96-physicist.html and https://www.atomicheritage.org/profile/howard-r-kratz. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Perry B. Ritter

edit
 

Hello, Jerrypop2a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Perry B. Ritter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Micheal Treshow V

edit

  Hello, Jerrypop2a. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Micheal Treshow V, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Micheal Treshow V

edit
 

Hello, Jerrypop2a. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Micheal Treshow V".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)Reply