License tagging for Image:Et-plain.gif edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Et-plain.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Seifu.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Seifu.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Blake russell edit

 

A tag has been placed on Blake russell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 18:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:GezahegneAberaInFrontOfMyCar.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Hi Jay.wind!
We thank you for uploading Image:GezahegneAberaInFrontOfMyCar.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Notability of Robert Gurtler edit

 

A tag has been placed on Robert Gurtler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Porturology (talk) 07:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Elisha.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Elisha.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

NowCommons: File:GezahegneAbera.jpg edit

File:GezahegneAbera.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:GezahegneAberaInFrontOfMyCar.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:GezahegneAberaInFrontOfMyCar.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 10 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

{{hangon}} tag edit

This tag is only intended for articles currently nominated for speedy deletion. The speedy deletion of that article was declined over a month ago, and there is little to no chance it will be deleted in the future. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Robert Gurtler edit

I have nominated Robert Gurtler, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Gurtler. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DGG ( talk ) 16:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Teyba Naser edit

I have nominated Teyba Naser, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teyba Naser. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 05:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Citizen baby edit

 

The article Citizen baby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism; Google and Google News searches turn up no uses of the term; possible original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Jay.wind! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 935 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. John Neter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

June 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in House (TV series), makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:38, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in House (TV series). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

No more edits to Gen. Barry McCaffrey's page, do you understand? edit

Gen. Barry McCaffrey is a living person with rights of publicity. No edits will be allowed to his page. You can edit it all you want, but I will kill your edits and you can go home early.

You do not have the right to take control of a Wikipedia page. Threatening to do so may lead to your being blocked from editing the encyclopedia. Please discuss your proposed changes or issues with the article on the appropriate talk page. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 07:49, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 08:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

UNBLOCK edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jay.wind (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_McCaffrey contains information about a prominent living person. The user MATERIALSCIENTIST insists on uploading false and libelous information. After two rounds of his changes overlaying my changes overlaying his changes, he caused a block. This matter must go to the arbitration committee.

Jay.wind (talk) 08:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Multiple other editors disagree with your opinion of some of that content, and you wound up blindly undoing their edits even after they seemed receptive and starting to investigate and address your concerns. The first step in dispute resolution is to talk about it in a civil manner with the other editors. Once your block expires, feel free to raise your concerns on the article talk-page, being specific about which items you feel are inappropriate. DMacks (talk) 09:19, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is an obvious result of your behavior, which I warned you about above. You have not provided specific details as to what content you believe is unsourced, libelous or otherwise violates Wikipedia content policies. You were right to remove some of the information - because it was unsourced and dubious. But you also removed a number of well-sourced arguments that were published in reliable sources by respected journalists, which became issues of significant debate and controversy. It is neither libelous nor against any content policy to republish matters of controversy that have been explored by reliable sources. I invite you to post on your talk page specific examples of your concerns, and if there is further content of the article which violates BLP, I shall be more than happy to immediately remove it. But you need to discuss it, not just revert and threaten. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
It's wrong for other editors to select only negative material for inclusion in a Wikipedia biography, but the easiest way to improve the article is to leave some of that well-sourced negative stuff, and simply add the rest of the story that balances out the article. I tried to do that today for the section about his tenure as drug czar.Anythingyouwant (talk) 04:59, 14 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

I shall follow the guidelines henceforth. edit

I shall follow the guidelines henceforth.

General McCaffrey today sent me a large number of edits, which I shall make slowly and incrementally, with a talk comment about each one. Wherever possible, I shall add references to original sources. For instance, I shall tonight add West Point Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy presentation of its 2010 Distinguished Graduate Award to Gen. McCaffrey, original source http://www.westpointaog.org/page.aspx?pid=4039&chid=81

For now, I shall leave intact the paragraphs critical of Gen. McCaffrey. As I delve deeper into the article, I shall open talk comments about specific changes.

I am glad to include my real name and my real phone number.

Thank you Jay Jacob Wind, 703-927-4833

Jay.wind (talk) 02:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Improved references in paragraph 1, added paragraph 2 edit

I improved the references in paragraph 1 and added paragraph 2 about Gen. McCaffrey's prestigious West Point award.

That's all for tonight.

He served as adjunct professor at U.S. Military Academy and also Bradley Professor of International Security Studies from 2001 to 2008. He is also a military analyst for NBC and MSNBC as well as president of his own consulting firm, BR McCaffrey Associates.[1]

West Point Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy presented its 2010 Distinguished Graduate Award to Gen. McCaffrey.[2]

Jay.wind (talk) 02:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ "Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, USA (Ret.) MSNBC and Nightly News Military analyst". www.NBCnews.com. January 17, 2008.
  2. ^ "2010 DISTINGUISHED GRADUATE AWARD GEN (R) BARRY MCCAFFREY '64". West Point Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy. 2010.
Hi Jay, and welcome back. Talk comments will be helpful as you work on the McCaffrey article, but please put those comments mainly at Talk:Barry_McCaffrey instead of here at this page. Thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 03:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Zelalem injera edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zelalem injera, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:56, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Morton Yolkut edit

Hello Jay.wind,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Morton Yolkut, may be copied from http://www.philly.com/philly/obituaries/20131117_Morton_Yolkut__70__NE_Phila__rabbi_for_four_decades.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 03:37, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have deleted the article under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion as a blatant copyright violation. Please be aware of the issue; we take it very seriously – don't copy and paste content like this anywhere on Wikipedia. Thanks.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:53, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Morton Yolkut edit

I rewrote Rabbi Morton Yolkut's biography from scratch in my own words, citing original sources extensively.

I hope now it is acceptable.

Rabbi Yolkut was a prominent Jewish leader who represented his people nationwide.

Disclosure: I am Aline Schlesinger's first cousin, and I attended their wedding, the bar mitzvahs of their sons, the weddings of their sons, and Rabbi Yolkut's shiva services (tonight). I wrote the article as unbiased as I could possibly be, given my closeness to the family.

-- Thank you -- Jay Jacob Wind -- jay.wind@att.net -- 703-927-4833

Jay.wind (talk) 07:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 20 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Morton Yolkut, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

OK I'll fix that edit

OK I'll fix that.

Jay.wind (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Morton Yolkut edit

 

The article Morton Yolkut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent, reliable references about him besides his obituary notice per WP:SOURCES Member of Congress giving a speech about him is no big deal.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:26, 21 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

November 2013 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Schindlerjuden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2| 229| Ju.| 229| 69065| {{sortname|Jakob|Bierer|nolink=1}}| {{Dts|1908-2-17}}|Maschineningenieur (BA

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Schindlerjuden may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | Maschineningenieur (BA

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Willie Wind may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2, Line 233, and Chaskel is listed by his [[Hebrew name]], "Abraham Schlesinger" on List 1, Line 37) on Schindler's List.<ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Schindlerjuden</ref> <ref>{{cite

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Barry McCaffrey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Willie Wind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarnow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Minor and major edits edit

Tonight, I corrected the missing brackets in the REF commands on Morton Yolkut's page and the misspelling of Tarnow, Poland in Willie Wind's page.

I also added extensively to Barry McCaffrey's page.

Jay.wind (talk) 07:57, 29 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for December 4 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barry McCaffrey, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Department of Defense, Republican Guard and Commencement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Missing right parentheses edit

On the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Schindlerjuden the text Jakob Bierer 1908-2-17 Maschineningenieur (BA is exactly as it appears on Schindler's List, verbatim.

But to satisfy the BracketBot, I arbitrarily added a right parenthesis to mame it Jakob Bierer 1908-2-17 Maschineningenieur (BA)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Seven Basic Plots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

User page content edit

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed a minor issue with your userpage, which doesn't meet Wikipedia's requirements that user pages are focused on their Wikipedia related endeavors rather than self promotion or resume - style writings (see Wikipedia:User pages#NO). However as a courtesy I am drawing this to your attention rather than editing your pages unilaterally. Basically Wikipedia cannot be used for self promotion, and user pages are provided to facilitate social understanding between users concerning their Wikipedia activities (they are not "free personal web pages" as on many other websites), so all but a brief summary about yourself and non-Wikipedia activities is a bit out of place. I'm very sorry about that. But I figure it's best to say so and ask you to read the guideline than do anything unilaterally without discussion. Changing the page so that it more clearly meets Wikipedia guidelines may be a good way to address it.

A good option might be to rewrite it to focus on your extensive editing improvements on Wikipedia. Alternatives are to leave a note here or on my talk page to discuss it, or to ask any administrator to simply delete it (add {{db-userreq}} to the top of the page in question). I'm sorry for troubling you with this.

FT2 (Talk | email) 15:35, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion edit

Your user page, User:Jay.wind, has been nominated for deletion. This is because nothing has happened since my comment above, over 2 weeks ago, and the issue needs resolving. Your opinions on the matter are very welcome; please read our policy on user pages and participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jay.wind. You are also free to edit the page, fix any issues yourself, or request deletion of the page, while the discussion is continuing, but you should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion.

I have emailed you as well, as I see you haven't edited Wikipedia in the last couple of months, and you may not be aware of the discussion if you don't receive notification emails. Thank you, and again, I'm sorry for troubling you with this. FT2 (Talk | email) 09:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion edit

Hello, your userpage has been deleted following Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jay.wind. You MAY create a new user page. Please review the userpage guidelines here: WP:USERPAGE before recreating. — xaosflux Talk 13:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Googlejack edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Googlejack, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 04:44, 2 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Godaddy intrusion edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Godaddy intrusion, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Willie Wind edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Willie Wind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ovguide.com/willie-wind-9202a8c04000641f8000000000e5da40. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 27 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Law of the instrument, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Jay.wind. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Jay.wind. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2018 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Schindlerjuden, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:47, 17 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Schindlerjuden, you may be blocked from editing. If you re-add this material in opposition to the RFC result without discussing first, I will seek administrative intervention to prevent you from editing that article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:22, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Jay.wind. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of people saved by Oskar Schindler for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people saved by Oskar Schindler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people saved by Oskar Schindler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Francisco Duran edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Francisco Duran, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:02, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of DR. FRANCISCO DURAN edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that DR. FRANCISCO DURAN, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the page entitled all in CAPS should be deleted. I could not figure out how to do that.

Duran edit

Hi Jay, the bio you created has been deleted because the subject isn't notable enough; see WP:N and WP:GOLDENRULE. You would need to produce independent secondary sources such as newspaper articles. I looked around before deleting and didn't find anything. If that's mistaken and you do have sources, let me know. Best, SarahSV (talk) 02:34, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

[Copied from SV talk] Arlington (Virginia) Public Schools' School Board last night announced the appointment of Dr. Francisco Duran to be Superintendent of Schools from June 1, 2020, to June 30, 2023. This appointment affects all 250,000 people in Arlington and many outside the county. Our local newspapers convey the story:
https://www.arlnow.com/2020/05/07/nationwide-search-finds-new-aps-superintendent-in-fairfax-county/
https://www.insidenova.com/news/arlington/arlington-turns-to-fairfax-for-new-superintendent-of-schools/article_571d25d6-911c-11ea-b161-27d370a587b0.html
and soon, The Washington Post.
To create an article about Dr. Duran, I copied his biography from the official Fairfax Schools web page https://www.fcps.edu/staff/francisco-duran
I think his selection merits inclusion in Wikipedia as a person who will hold great influence over a large population.
Jay.wind (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hi Jay wind, I've copied your reply here, so that the conversation is on one page. If you need to reply again, please do it here. You can read our notability guideline for people at Wikipedia:Notability (people). It says: "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject."
You've collected two stories so far about his appointment. If the Washington Post covers something about him, that will be a good step in the right direction. How do you know there will be a Washington Post article? SarahSV (talk) 20:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Washington Post always covers stories about top school officials in the region's jurisdictions.
I'll notify you when the Post article appears.
Jay.wind (talk) 20:31, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
Okay, thank you. Bear in mind that it has to be in-depth coverage. There are thousands of school superintendents in the US alone. We can't host articles on them all. SarahSV (talk) 21:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
WP:POLITICIAN is probably the closest guideline, with WP:POLOUTCOMES having useful supporting examples. "Routine coverage", even if a long report about it, seems generally not to be sufficient itself to merit a stand-alone article. DMacks (talk) 21:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply