User talk:Hamza Ali Shah/Archives/2022/April
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Hamza Ali Shah/Archives/2022, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Welcome!
|
The Pakistan Star | |
| Thank you for joining WikiProject Pakistan, an open group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage on Pakistan-related topics. samee talk 13:18, 9 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| this WikiAward was given to Hamza Ali Shah by samee talk on 13:18, 9 March 2018 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Hamza Ali Shah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
The article Rameez Raja (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Disambiguation not required (WP:2DABS). The primary topic has a hatnote to the only other use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Salman Irshad image question
Hi Hamza Ali Shah. I've posted a response to your question at WP:MCQ#Salman Irshad. It's best to respond there so that the discussion remains in one place. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:51, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Overseas Warriors for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Overseas Warriors, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Warriors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
External links
I've reverted your good-faith edit to 2021 Kashmir Premier League as it doesn't actually have any external links. (We also use a lowercase L for that heading, per MOS:ELLAYOUT). I apologise for accidentally failing to provide an edit summary; I do understand that your edit was constructive. Certes (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, I’ll try not make that mistake again. Thanks for informing me. Hamza Ali Shah Talk 20:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Kashmir Premier League players draft, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Haider Ali, Iftikhar Ahmed and Asif Ali.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
KPL squad templates
Just to let you know, I've started a discussion about deleting the Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) squad templates that you created. Discussion is here. Feel free to contribute. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
PSL Teams squads
Hi, I hope you would be fine. I want your advise as I wanted to create templates of every teams' squads. Because it is very hectic when editors go to change or add something in teams squads section as every teams squad is connected with two or three different pages for example. Peshawar Zalmi squad section is on their main page and also on Peshawar Zalmi in 2022. So we need to do same edits on two different pages. If we have a template just like Points table we don't have to worry about that issue and it would also save enery and time. Please let me know what you think about this. Thanks. Babar A. Khan 85 (talk) 13:39, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Babar A. Khan 85, I hope you are also well. I agree that it is time consuming to edit the squads on various articles, and I think your idea is clever, but it is probably better to transclude them from the article for the 2022 PSL squads. I’ve just edited Peshawar Zalmi in 2022 and now it is transcluded from 2022 PSL squads. This is the alternative being used as you only have to edit the 2022 PSL squads and all of the articles get updated. Hope this helps! Hamza Ali Shah Talk 04:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Ok Hamza Ali Shah, that's also a good idea. Thanks for the help. Babar A. Khan 85 (talk) 13:03, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:Quetta Gladiators task force articles indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 06:20, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Hamza Ali Shah. This edit by yourself came up on my watchlist and I'm intrigued because it may be fortuitous. I have recently been thinking about cancelling the merger of those articles (the season reviews from 1741 to 1750) into the history. Hope you don't mind but I'm pinging Jhall1 here as he is also interested in the subject.
Did you have a reason to remove the merger template or was it a mistake? If you have a reason, I'd be interested because I'm coming round to the view that the season articles should be retained. There is, so I understand, a lot of source information about cricket in the 1740s and so the season reviews could be expanded. Apparently, there is much less from about 1751 till the mid-1760s, perhaps because there was a major war in that period.
Any thoughts you have on this would be appreciated but please accept my apologies if you have simply made a mistake while reading the article. Thanks and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @No Great Shaker: sorry I thought the merge had happened which was why I was removing it. My mistake! Hamza Ali Shah Talk 14:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, no, still in progress but taking a long time. Thanks, though, and all the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Signature change needed
Please update your signature as shown in this edit. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:55, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 Kashmir Premier League players draft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abrar Ahmed.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
— MusikAnimal talk 00:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
"Template:Kashmir Premier League" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Kashmir Premier League and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 26#Template:Kashmir Premier League until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)