Gro456

Gro456, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Gro456! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi

I would strongly suggest, you report our new favorit user for vandalism and disruptive editing (as you are directly affected by this, in several cases). If you don't do it, I will consider going ahead. Best, --LH7605 (talk) 12:42, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Ok, to be honest, in this case, I would argue that they are right, as it is usual to insert only after the complete set has been played. But in general, I stand by my points. Best, --LH7605 (talk) 12:44, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear LH7605 The user was reported by me yesterday, of course you can also do it on your own initiative. In this case, there was an interruption due to rain, and if the match is abandoned, you can enter the score that was before the interruption Gro456 (talk) 12:49, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Solden / Rettenbach

Why are you changing the max incline to 65%, it was clearly shown in the broadcast that max incline is at 68.2%. Didn't you watch it? Sportomanokin (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Sportomanokin, see the official post on the Facebook page: FIS Alpine World Cup Tour, which highlights that it is 65% User:Gro456 (talk) 14:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Both in 1st and 2nd helmet camera run, shown 68.2% over "Eisfall". It used to be even 70% (depending on how much snow is on the slope). But definetly not 65%. Sportomanokin (talk) 12:51, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Chronoligal

Not a big deal but per last years, i went just by the time it happened and sorted it that way. Kante4 (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Naoki Nakamura moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Naoki Nakamura, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JW 1961 ^Talk 12:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:57, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

I'm not doing anything wrong, all the information provided has sources - it's consistent, correct and helpful. It appears in many other sources and articles. I'd be more inclined that you're the one acting out of line - deleting confirmed data. Wikipedia is a platform that is created by everyone with respect for other users. I therefore conclude that the information given should be published. I don't see any other justification for it to disappear. If your intended action is to delete other users' publications, you should think deeply about it. That is why, Dear Sportsfan 1234 - I am requesting a justification for your action.Gro456 23:22, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi Gro456 and Sportsfan 1234, there was a report at WP:AIV about this. It was declined and removed because that noticeboard is for reporting obvious vandalism (i.e. intentional damage, malice) only, which doesn't seem to be the case here. If all other ways of dispute resolution fail, the central noticeboard for general reports is WP:ANI. I highly recommend attempting to get this resolved without going to ANI, as that's really a last resort, though. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:28, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Please review WP:OR and Wikipedia:Fictitious references as the links you provided DO NOT list the information you are citing. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:44, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Novak AO points

Hi Gro456, Normally, a player will lose the points from the year before when a tournament happens, BUT because the AO was 3 weeks later last year (2021), players are able to keep those points (for another 3 weeks) IF they're more than what they earned in 2022. (see the script in the bit above seeded players - as same for withdrawn players). Therefore, Novak earned 2,000 points in 2021 and will keep those points for another 3 weeks after the tournament has concluded. As a result, no one can replace him from #1 ranking. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 08:23, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Dear, Tobyjamesaus It's just that no official source says this. In the case of the ATP website, it was always presented that points would be lost due to tournament delays, this was given a later date. In addition, the ATP reported that it was entering a "normal" cycle of deducting points for previous results. In this case, the ATP states that the points earned for 2020 players will be lost on January 31, and for 2021 on February 21 (depending on when there was a better result). Besides, in Novak's case - when the points are the same in both 2020 and 2021 - the "more important" in this case is for 2020. Gro456 08:37, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Hey there, so players are only keeping ONE of AO points from 2020 or 2021, not both. I am not sure if that was your understanding, but just wanted to make that clear.  :)

As far the entering "normal cycle", I agree and I have read that too, but "normal cycle" is 52 weeks. So again, in the case of Djokovic, his '2000 points' from 2020 are already removed as he had '2000 points' from 2021 and they will remain until 21 Feb 2022 and then drop off. (I am trying to write it another way for understanding). So it is possible that (with a good result) Medvedev or Zverev could place themselves into a position to become #1 in the world on that date but they cannot overtake Djokovic on 31 Jan 2022. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 08:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Dear, Tobyjamesaus By my reasoning on the other hand - the points for 2020 were locked up to be lost in 2021, so if the 2020 tournament was in January and the player got more points then, he will lose them in 2022 on the same date. But, if the 2021 tournament was better, they will be deducted on 21 Feb. Gro456 08:44, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Correct. Novak has already lost his 2020 points and is keeping his 2021 points (which of course, is the same value) and so those 2000 will come off on 21 feb 2022.

This keeps Novak’s points consistency with other (including withdrawn) players’ points in this and WTA article too as entered by another editor. Tobyjamesaus (talk) 09:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

• Dear, Tobyjamesaus Novak, as well as every other player, have not yet lost points for the Australian Open in 2020 - they have only been blocked from losing them in 2021.

January 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2021–22 Biathlon World Cup. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:28, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello

Leave my changes. You take them back and then make them back in yourself. Let something like that or I have to report you because of VM 89.14.147.102 (talk) 12:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC) Dear, User talk:89.14.147.102 - Because they were full of mistakes

Just to chip in. This user is a sock of Charli 250 (talk · contribs), so you are free to revert any edit he makes. Kante4 (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited FIS Cup (ski jumping), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Dreher.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Unnecessary bold in infoboxes of 2020–21 Biathlon World Cup and 2021–22 Biathlon World Cup

Hello Sir! I find it weird that you reverted my changes (remove bold from infobox) as ALL previous years' infoboxes are not in bold. Too much bold emphasis is unnecessary. Cheerio! (ZeFrenchDude (talk) 18:03, 20 March 2022 (UTC))

Dear, ZeFrenchDude: Yes, it’s best to remove anything you don’t need. This is essential, emphasising the confirmation of the successes achieved. Gro456 18:05, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello again! The problem is that when ALL names are in bold, you are not emphasising but cluttering. (Check the previous years, it looks much nicer.) I hope you will agree with me someday and restore my changes Anyway, it's not important and I will leave it to you there. Cheerio! (ZeFrenchDude (talk) 18:22, 20 March 2022 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oberhof.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

2022–23 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup

Nordic World Championships is not part of World Cup, it is another competition, it doesn't belong to this page, because it is confusing to average reader. Sportomanokin (talk) 07:45, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Not to confuse ex "Srednja Bloudkova" (1949--2011) hill in Planica which was actually constructed by Stanko Bloudek and was located on another spot (today HS61 and HS80 stands on that spot) with complete new normal hill HS102 (constructed by Klemen Kobal) on another location next to Bloudkova velikanka (HS138). Sportomanokin (talk) 15:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

HS102 is simply called "Srednja skakalnica" (normal hill) because axis and name of Bloudkova velikanka are protected as monuments and cannot be changed or used in other objects. Sportomanokin (talk) 15:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Naoki Nakamura

Hello, Gro456. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naoki Nakamura, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gro456

Thank you for creating 2022–23 FIS Freestyle Ski World Cup.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:34, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

DFB

As per previous editions there is no need to bold a team. If you feel like it should, you should to start a discussion per WP:BRD. Kante4 (talk) 16:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

There is nothing to suggest that one should refer to previous articles, that one should modernize oneself in order to pursue a good cause. Gro456 16:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Just blindly reverting without starting a discussion (i did it for you) is not a good way. You add something, i rverted so it should remain how it was until a consensus is found. I will ask the footy project to get more votes in. Kante4 (talk) 16:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

FYI: There is the discussion. Kante4 (talk) 16:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

European Championships 2022

I invite you to check the talk page of the page, to avoid an edit war. I have restored to the status quo GianluSport (talk) 13:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

2023–24 Biathlon World Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023–24 Biathlon World Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Biathlon World Cup (April 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023–24 Biathlon World Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

2023–24 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023–24 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 Biathlon World Cup (September 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TechnoSquirrel69 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023–24 Biathlon World Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gro456. Thank you for your work on 2023–24 Biathlon IBU Cup. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:45, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2023–24 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023–24 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

2023-24 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup

There are 170 different World Cup winners (not 169). Check official FIS statistics Sportomanokin (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Gro456! Your additions to Wielka Krokiew have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 22:05, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Justus Strelow moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Justus Strelow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Danilo Riethmüller moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Danilo Riethmüller. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Dear JTtheOG (talk), Double standards, you accept websites that have too little data and few footnotes, while reliably verified information that is confirmed by materials is not accepted. Funny Gro456 (talk) 20:38, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

I'm not too sure what you mean by the double standard. You are free to elaborate on this. Regardless, please provide third-party sources that address Riethmüller directly and in detail in order to show that he meets WP:GNG. Cheers. JTtheOG (talk) 20:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Well, I explained what it means above, apart from which external sources do not confirm the information in this article? Gro456 (talk) 20:49, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Dear JTtheOG (talk), that is why I am appealing this decision and demand that the previous status be restored, i.e. the page be removed from the draft, because, as I said, the article comply with standards to a greater extent than even other articles that have much fewer of them and operate in the public space. Gro456 (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument. The article did not comply with our standards at the time of draftification, but the Sportschau source you have is a good start towards establishing notability of the subject (even though it's basically an interview). Please include more of this sort of coverage in future articles if you would prefer to avoid this route. Cheers. JTtheOG (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danilo Riethmüller (January 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Danilo Riethmüller and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Danilo Riethmüller has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danilo Riethmüller. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Lou Jeanmonnot / color of the wikitable

Hello Sir! Please stop changing the color of the wikitable. This makes no sense! Cheerio! ZeFrenchDude (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Dear ZeFrenchDude (talk), I do not change the color, only the aesthetic value of the page, because too large a table redirects to all the data below the bar regarding the player's personal data, sometimes it is worth delving deeper into it. Gro456 (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, you removed the source that confirms the results. Gro456 (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello again, Apologies about removing the reference. Not my initial intention. I must have a different setting because I don't have the issue about the table wrapping around the infobox. But I strongly disagree with the change of background color from gray to blue. Can we agree to keep it gray? ZeFrenchDude (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Many other biathletes have tables in this color. Gro456 (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Many other biathletes have tables in gray too! For example Ingrid Landmark Tandrevold. So who gets to decide which color is correct! ZeFrenchDude (talk) 22:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Gro456!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

World cup

Hi, please, do not revert edits without commenting why. You did this several times already. Listing the leads in the standings is unclear and somewhat unnecessary, as well as arbitrary (you are just listing overall and nation cup, not the other ones). The scoreboard at the end is enough, the progression is possibly interesting as a summary. Tone 17:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Tone, Again, can you refrain from deleting materials that affect the editorial integrity and readability of the website? Once again, you have removed the issues regarding whether certain players have a yellow jersey - information about who has this privilege in a given competition, i.e. is the leader of the World Cup in a given classification. Please do not remove it based on your own suggestions - because it is "irrelevant" from you! Gro456 (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

There used to be a better way a while ago where the yellow jersey was tracked at the side. The way you do it looks like uncited synthesis of the material. Tone 17:29, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Tone You probably don't understand this issue, such tables are also available in other winter sports or other language versions of Wikipedia - it shows who was the leader of a given classification for what period of time - it was moved from the table of general results because there was no space for it to a separate section. Please next time ask about such issues on the talk page, and not voluntarily delete some issues because you don't understand them. Gro456 (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

I have been following winter sports wiki articles for 10+ years, I am well aware of the seasons and rankings. What I argue is that the style that you are using is confusing and at minimum lacks a summary at the beginning to explain to the casual reader what this is about. See how it used to be done, let's say, random list 2014–15 FIS Ski Jumping World Cup. This was neat and comprehensive. Now it is not. Tone 17:35, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Tone, Please feel free to go ahead and create it if you think it is a better solution, and if not, please do not delete other tables - since that one is also described and explained what it is about. I don't see any reason to claim that it is incomprehensible. Gro456 (talk) 17:39, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Let me try then. Feel free to improve ;) Tone 17:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Actually, after some thinking, reformatting everything would require lots of lots of work. Let's leave it as it is, it still works. Sorry for the detour ;) Tone 20:05, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Gro456. Thank you for your work on Clemens Leitner. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)