User talk:Geo Swan/archive/2020-09


2004, 2005, 2006-01--2006-06, 2006-07--2006-10, 2006-10--2005-12, 2007-01--2007-06, 2007-07--2007-09, 2007-10--2007-12, 2008-01--2008-06, 2008-07--2008-09, 2008-10--2008-12, 2009-01--2009-03, 2009-04--2009-06, 2009-07--2009-09, 2009-10--2009-12, 2010-01, 2010-02, 2010-03, 2010-04, 2010-05, 2010-06, 2010-07, 2010-08, 2010-09, 2010-10, 2010-11, 2010-12, 2011-01, 2011-02, 2011-03, 2011-04, 2011-05, 2011-06, 2011-07, 2011-08, 2011-09, 2011-10, 2011-11, 2011-12, 2012-01, 2012-02, 2012-03, 2012-04, 2012-05, 2012-06, 2012-07, 2012-08, 2012-09, 2012-10, 2012-11, 2012-12, 2013-01, 2013-02, 2013-03, 2013-04, 2013-05, 2013-06, 2013-07, 2013-08, 2013-09, 2013-10, 2013-11, 2013-12, 2014-01, 2014-02, 2014-03, 2014-04, 2014-05, 2014-06, 2014-07, 2014-08, 2014-09, 2014-10, 2014-11, 2014-12, 2015-01, 2015-02, 2015-03, 2015-04, 2015-05, 2015-06, 2015-07, 2015-08, 2015-09, 2015-10, 2015-11, 2015-12, 2016-01, 2016-02, 2016-03, 2016-04, 2016-05, 2016-06, 2016-07, 2016-08, 2016-09, 2016-10, 2016-11, 2016-12, 2017-01, 2017-02, 2017-03, 2017-04, 2017-05, 2017-06, 2017-07, 2017-08, 2017-09, 2017-10, 2017-11, 2017-12, 2018-01, 2018-02, 2018-03, 2018-04, 2018-05, 2018-06, 2018-07, 2018-08, 2018-09, 2018-10, 2018-11, 2018-12, 2019-01, 2019-02, 2019-03, 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-06, 2019-07, 2019-08, 2019-09, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2019-12, 2020-01, 2020-02, 2020-03, 2020-04, 2020-05, 2020-06, 2020-07, 2020-08, 2020-09, 2020-10, 2020-11, User Talk:Geo Swan/archive/list

Actresses

edit

It's a simple fact, that can be plainly observed by finding any article about an actress whose page title has a disambiguator in it. And if you still don't believe me, feel free to take a gander at the list of disambiguated actresses I've compiled for you at User:Bearcat/Altomedia. Bearcat (talk) 06:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Have you ever read my essay User:Geo Swan/Nothing is obvious. I asked if you could point to a wikidocument. Instead, it seems to me, you have claimed your opinion is, well, obviously correct.
  • In my experience here I come across my respondents claiming, all the time, that their personal opinion is "obviously" true - so obviously true there is no reason for them to make the effort to actually explain themselves.
  • A decade ago there was this very aggressive guy who was convinced everyone with an Arabic name should be sorted as if they had they had an inherited European style surname. If you don't know, if Arabic countries, people do take their father's name, as part of their name, but not in the European style. Their last name is their father's first name, like Eric the Red's son's name was Lief Ericson. This very aggressive guy took the minority position that since "al" was an article, roughly equivalent to English "the". He spent months changing the {{DEFAULTSORT:}} in every article about someone with an Arabic style name from {{DEFAULTSORT:Mohamed al-Example}} or {{DEFAULTSORT:al-Example, Mohammed}} to {{DEFAULTSORT:Example, Mohammed al}}. He was dogmatic about it. Wouldn't budge. Wouldn't even consider counter-arguments.
  • Don't be like that guy. If you can't point to a wikidocument, please consider acknowledging you can't point to a wikidocument.
  • That you can list 500 instances of female actors with the disambiguator (actress) as part of the title of their article may only mean someone aggressively moved hundreds of articles, without considering whether what seemed too obvious to question actually merited discussion. Geo Swan (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Replaceable fair use File:Canol-trail-moose-antlers-in-wires.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Canol-trail-moose-antlers-in-wires.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 18:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Canol-trail-moose-antlers-in-wires.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Canol-trail-moose-antlers-in-wires.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 7 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sandra Hodgkinson for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Hodgkinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Hodgkinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 16:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Page: Stanley_Walter_Croucher_Pack

edit

Hello, You seem to be the main main contributor to the page on SWC Pack. I'm currently reading Pack's book on Anson's Voyage round the world. The "author's bio" on my book contains material which you might by able to integrate into the article. I've put the text on the article talk page along with a scan of the book cover. I'm really not sure how to combine this material with what is already there. There is also a photo of Pack which is interesting but likely presents a copyright problem. OldBoar (talk) 09:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

My impression is that Stanley_Walter_Croucher_Pack was pompous and narrow minded. But he still merits improved coverage. I'll take a look. I am going to have to look at your contribution history to figure out where that material is. Do you know how to use diffs? Geo Swan (talk) 18:00, 12 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Some user drafts moved to draftspace

edit

FYI, another user moved some of your userspace drafts into draftspace (where they may be eligible for G13 deletion if not actively worked on).[2] Just letting you know in case you care and/or want to move them back into userspace. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

edit
 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Brides of ISIL

edit

Hi Geo Swan,

Thanks for your edits on the article Brides of ISIL. Just a friendly reminder, when entering a new row, please make sure to do the following:

1. Use the same formatting as previous rows for the "Home country" column.

i.e

{{BEL}} instead of [[Belgium]]: (renders as   Belgium)
{{CAN}} instead of [[Canada]]: (renders as   Canada)
{{FRA}} instead of [[France]]: (renders as   France)

etc


2. Update the table in the "Statistics" section appropriately.

Thanks!

Kvwiki1234 (talk) 10:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

"05-2106" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 05-2106. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 28#05-2106 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply