Hello

Camels and Ostriches in the Black Forest? edit

Where did that come from? "Everything is possible in the Black Forest".

Just curious, since someone asked.

An Invite to join Novels WikiProject edit

 

Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres.

As you have shown an interest in Mr. Magorium's Wonder Emporium (novel) we thought you might like to take an interest in this well established WikiProject.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Newpages

Moving Agent Pendergast edit

Hi Frog47,

I noticed that you created the Aloysius Pendergast article and moved the content from Agent Pendergast there. This was a great idea and I wanted to thank you for it. However, I also wanted to recommend using the "move" feature (one of the tabs at the top of most articles) in the future. The nice part about the "move" feature is that it does everything you did manually, but also moves the page's history, talk page, and talk history. That's useful information to have associated with the main article, and unfortunately it doesn't get transferred if done manually. MaxVeers 18:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Barbie Mariposa edit

I have nominated Barbie Mariposa, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie Mariposa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. WebHamster 20:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

UFC 84 edit

A discussion is happening right now on the fate of UFC 84. Because the outcome of this discussion could affect other MMA event pages and how/when they are created, your input would be greatly appreciated. The discussion is happening here. Thank you for your assistance! Gromlakh (talk) 17:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quick request edit

In the future, if you could use {{Film}} instead of {{FilmsWikiProject}}, I'd be very grateful. Although the latter one automatically redirects to the former, it has been deprecated, and we're trying to phase out its usage as task force tagging slowly occurs over the next year or so. Knowing that it's not being added to new articles would put me greatly at ease. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Novels WikiProject edit

 

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Liveste (talkedits) 22:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIII - April 2008 edit

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

 
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter
Issue XXIII - April 2008
Project news
  • Elections are now taking place for coordinators of the project for the next six months. Any editors interested in seeking a coordinator position, or who want a say in who is selected, should indicate as much here.
Member news
  • The project has currently 381 members, 69 joined & 0 leavers since the start of March 2008.
Other news
Task force news
Novel related news
Current debates
  • There is a discussion regarding further task forces for other genres of fiction now taking place here.
From the Members

Welcome to the Twenty Third issue of the Novels WikiProject's newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

We would encourage all members to get more involved and if you are wondering what with, please ask.

Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk), Initiating Editor

Collaboration of the Month
Newsletter challenge

Last month's challenge (South Wind) was completed by member User:Blathnaid with a nice starting stub.

  • The first person to start the article is mentioned in the next newsletter. This month's article is Kate Christensen's 2008 PEN/Faulkner award winner The Great Man.

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

John Carter (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiCookie edit

 
Just stopping by with cookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 00:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXIV - May 2008 edit

The May 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveCrossinBot (talk) 07:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Trading Places International edit

 

I have nominated Trading Places International, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trading Places International. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? slakrtalk / 18:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XXV - June 2008 edit

The June 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. SteveBot (owner) 02:18, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Calling all active WP:NOVELS members edit

WikiProject Novels Roll Call
 

WikiProject Novels is currently holding a roll call, which we hope to have annually. Your username is listed on the members list, but we are unsure as to which editors are still active within the project. If you still consider yourself an active WP:Novels editor, please add your name back to the Active Members list. Also feel free to join any of our task forces and take a look at the project's Job Centre to get involved!

Next month we will begin the coordinator election selection process. We hope to have more involvement and input this time around! More news will be forthcoming. Thanks, everyone! María (habla conmigo) 16:16, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Novels Newsletter - September 2008 edit

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC) Reply

AfD nomination of Barbie and the Rockers: Out of this World edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Barbie and the Rockers: Out of this World, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbie and the Rockers: Out of this World. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 15:45, 28 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Echoes of Pink: A Pink Floyd Tribute edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Echoes of Pink: A Pink Floyd Tribute, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echoes of Pink: A Pink Floyd Tribute. Thank you. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 16:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Echoes of Pink: A Pink Floyd Tribute edit

 

A tag has been placed on Echoes of Pink: A Pink Floyd Tribute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirpsHELP) 04:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Conerly Trophy edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Conerly Trophy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not evedently notable. Article provides no independent sources. All reliable sources found are mere mentions. Needs substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of DeYoung Family Zoo edit

I have nominated DeYoung Family Zoo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeYoung Family Zoo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WebHamster 14:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wiki-meetup Nashville on Labor Day weekend! edit

 
Wiki-meetup Nashville will be September 5–6 (Labor Day weekend) 2009. No conference rooms or libraries. Food, beer and conversation, maybe even a show. So come either day or both! --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Leigh Anne Tuohy edit

 

A tag has been placed on Leigh Anne Tuohy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Parisse Boothe edit

 

The article Parisse Boothe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable single, does not meet WP:bio a separate article is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article." No significant information

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oo7565 (talk) 18:41, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Frog47! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Moe Iba - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. DeLane Matthews - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Amber Stevens - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Romaro Miller - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Yvette Nelson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. John J. Shea, Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:03, 16 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Arkansas Alligator Farm and Petting Zoo for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Arkansas Alligator Farm and Petting Zoo, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkansas Alligator Farm and Petting Zoo until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 19:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Frog47. I came accross your article when it was up for deletion. I found it to be notable and have added several references and voted keep in the AfD. I was also able to get help from Donlammers by asking at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Zoo. I hope you will be able to join in as I think we can save this article. -      Hydroxonium (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Limitations edit

 

The article Limitations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable per WP:BK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 21:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Limitations for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Limitations, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limitations until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:05, 20 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Wheel of Darkness for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article The Wheel of Darkness, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wheel of Darkness until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dallas Diesel edit

 

The article Dallas Diesel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N and WP:NSPORT, potential POV/COI issues, potential reliable source issues--appears that the organization wants to use Wikipedia as a free web host server instead of their own site.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul McDonald (talk) 22:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dallas Diesel for deletion edit

 

The article Dallas Diesel is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dallas Diesel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Paul McDonald (talk) 15:00, 13 January 2011 (UTC) on their talk page(s).Reply

Nomination of Newby's for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newby's is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newby's until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Miracle on 34th Street (1973 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Sebastian Cabot, James Gregory, David Hartman and David Doyle

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Scott Firth edit

 

The article Scott Firth has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Specs112 t c 20:06, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Lily Jackson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lily Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lily Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wikiproject Zoo mailing list edit

Hello! You are receiving this message because you have added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the first such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page. (Delivered: 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC))

Nomination of Yvette Nelson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvette Nelson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvette Nelson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.2 -2017 edit

Newsletter Nr 2, 2017-12-30, for WikiProject Zoo
 

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2018 edit

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page.


Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Proposed deletion of Guys Choice edit

 

The article Guys Choice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability in this article. Few mentions in non-entertainment media. Original article says it was modeled after another non-notable aware show.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Risker (talk) 01:33, 12 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Zoo - newsletter No.3 -2018 edit

Newsletter Nr 3, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Zoo
 

Wikiproject Zoo wish you a Happy New Year 2019 edit

The activity within the project has been rather low this year, and therefore we want to tell you that any kind of help to develop the project further next year will be extremely valued, like meking some of the red links blue, and participating any categorizing or whatever you want!

Participation:

This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Zoo, to everyone who added yourself as a member of the Wikiproject Zoo. This is the second such message, however we hope that this can be used to coordinate editing and development of articles later down the road. If you wish to opt out of further messages remove yourself from the mailing list here , and if consider yourself not active within the project, please remove yourself from member list here. For Wikiproject Zoo general discussions and suggestions, please use the project talk page.


Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Zoo coordinator Dan Koehl.

  Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Frog47, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

Proposed deletion of Gamma Theta Phi edit

 

The article Gamma Theta Phi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gamma Theta Phi for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gamma Theta Phi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Theta Phi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:29, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Laurie MacKenzie edit

 

The article Laurie MacKenzie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Derek Sharp edit

 

The article Derek Sharp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Derek Sharp for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derek Sharp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derek Sharp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:44, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Leonard Shaw edit

 

The article Leonard Shaw has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability has not been established

Non-notable musician. Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mennowiki (talk) 04:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Pretus edit

 

The article Jonathan Pretus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply