User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 102

Concern regarding Draft:Townsend-Wilkins House

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Townsend-Wilkins House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Amos Randall Johnston

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Amos Randall Johnston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:B. W. Marston

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:B. W. Marston, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:West Virginia Department of Arts, Culture and History

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:West Virginia Department of Arts, Culture and History, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:John B. Wright (West Virginia artist)

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John B. Wright (West Virginia artist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Arthur Palmer Hudson

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arthur Palmer Hudson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lakhdhiraji Waghji

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lakhdhiraji Waghji, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William H. Tunnard has been accepted

William H. Tunnard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 16:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

There used to be a warning here from me, but I'm removing it because it was a mistake from my end. Sorry! Actualcpscm (talk) 13:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

The introduction needs to summarize the body of the article. Can you clarify what you are disputing please User:Actualcpscm? FloridaArmy (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

When such a strong claim is made in the lead, it requires sourcing there too. Actualcpscm (talk) 12:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

"The colored people never can rise from their menial condition in our country; they ought not to be permitted to rise here. They are an inferior race of beings, and never can or ought to be recognized as the equals of the whites. Africa is the place for them." What policy says "strong claims" in the lead need to be cited? Did you even read the entry where he's described in detail as a leading opponent of education for African Americans because he thinks they are inferior and should be sent "back" to Africa? The lead improperly omits what he is most known for. Perhaps you'd like to write an appropriate summary User:Actualcpscm? FloridaArmy (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, I just checked the article again and your original edit was alright. I had a bit too many tabs open, and I must have confused it with another article. Apologies for that, feel free to re-implement. I'll take off the warning too, because totally unfair here. My bad, sorry again. Happy editing! Actualcpscm (talk) 13:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

No problem. Thank you for looking out for entries and being wary of strong claims added. Take care and have fun User:Actualcpscm. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audrey Thomas McCluskey (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audrey Thomas McCluskey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 03:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clara Campbell has been accepted

Clara Campbell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Odd question for you

I've noticed that in some of your drafts you will add "X should link here", however sometimes "X" is already linking somewhere else. Now, I'm not accusing you of anything, but do you actually check if an article already exists for something you want to have link to your draft when it goes to mainspace? ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages and hatnotes can be used to link to pages from existing entries and redirects. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Ah ok, so when you add that you aren't always asking for a redirect to be created under that title or for the redirect to be changed to go to the draft. Thanks for the clarification! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Robert C. Bannister

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert C. Bannister".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William W. Hence has been accepted

William W. Hence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 01:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fred Sulis

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fred Sulis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:55, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

• I can't find much for this, but was wondering whether it should be restored, moved to article space then redirected to the article for the rabbits foot, and his name mentioned there? I can perform that but again am unsure whether that would conflict me as an admin and editor? Not sure where Wikipedia is these days, and not sure how WP:BOLD applies anymore. It's what we used to do, for sure. Hiding T 11:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ersa Poston has been accepted

Ersa Poston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 11:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Decker has been accepted

Charles Decker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben McGee (politician) has been accepted

Ben McGee (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fred H. Stafford has been accepted

Fred H. Stafford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: President of the Arkansas Senate has been accepted

President of the Arkansas Senate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick A. Graf has been accepted

Frederick A. Graf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 14:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Opposition Party (disambiguation) has been accepted

Opposition Party (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eagleash (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fred Graf

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fred Graf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

• I can't find much for this, but was wondering whether it should be restored, moved to article space then redirected to the article for the building, and his name mentioned there? I can perform that but again am unsure whether that would conflict me as an admin and editor? Not sure where Wikipedia is these days, and not sure how WP:BOLD applies anymore. It's what we used to do, for sure. Hiding T 11:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

  @Hiding I don't think it would be an issue because you are not stepping on another's admin's decision given it is G13 (not like G11, etc.) but consider this a refund request. FloridiaArmy and I can handle to the rest, I think. S0091 (talk) 14:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

  @S0091 I put the article at Frederick A. Graf and created another redirect at Frederick Graf. If you at some point need the articles swapping for chain of authorship and better titling, let me know. If I get anything wrong let me know, I've been away a long time and rusty. Hiding T 14:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

  @Hiding sounds good. I think FloridaArmy will need update the content at Old Ozaukee County Courthouse to maintain attribution. S0091 (talk) 15:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me. I merged. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Managing drafts

Hi FloridaArmy, you may find this list of active drafts you have created helpful (over 1,000!), which can also export. I believe the date is the date created. At any time, you can run your own query here. I have noticed you complain about drafts being deleted but all it takes is an edit by a human to restart the G13 clock. Any edit will do, even a dummy edit. S0091 (talk) 17:57, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks very much User:S0091 that's very helpful! It's almost as if you read my mind. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Oh good! Have you considered putting a pause on creating new drafts and concentrating on what you have already started? I am also wondering if we can't make a table out the query and put it new user subpage in your user space. It would be nice to have extra columns for notes, etc. I have never done that but if you are interested, I can play around.

On a separate note, I notice you do not use Visual Editor (it seems anyway) but I encourage you do so as it does make many things easier, such as adding sources. I use VE exclusively for citations and largely for most things. For example, generally Google Books and websites can be cited using the "Automatic" function. Just just paste in the link, click generate, then insert. I also find it handy even when I have do manual citations (Newspapers.com) because all the fields are available. S0091 (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Eleanor Miller has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Eleanor Miller. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

George Moseley

Hi FloridaArmy, thanks for writing George Moseley, I've moved it to mainspace. ϢereSpielChequers 11:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neeta Mehta has been accepted

Neeta Mehta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 12:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Zenas Adkins has been accepted

Andrew Zenas Adkins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 13:58, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vienna High and Industrial School has been accepted

Vienna High and Industrial School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:11, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reade Brower has been accepted

Reade Brower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leona Egeland Rice has been accepted

Leona Egeland Rice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: People's Party of Georgia (April 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:People's Party of Georgia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Pam Adcock has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pam Adcock. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 17:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wanda Sankary has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wanda Sankary. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 19:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dorothy Donohue has been accepted

Dorothy Donohue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 06:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Kernot has been accepted

Henry Kernot, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

––– GMH MELBOURNE TALK 03:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. Poujade has been accepted

J. Poujade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pam Adcock has been accepted

Pam Adcock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James S. Slingerland has been accepted

James S. Slingerland, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rayfield Fisher has been accepted

Rayfield Fisher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Ann Wead Kimbrough - some help, please

A while ago you collaborated with me on this draft. It has just been declined. I chose to submit for review because I was unsure of its notability. I was relying on criterion 6 of WP:ACADEME.

I am hoping you might have a look at referencing and see if you can improve it?

I know you are limited on number of concurrent submissions, so please let me know on my talk page when you think it might be an "acceptance Candidate" and I'll submit it again. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

User:Timtrent I think this is a tough one because some of her book(s) are self-published. Have they been reviewed? May be too soon. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Damnably tough, think. I am certain she is important, but cannot prove notability 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:45, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eleanor Miller has been accepted

Eleanor Miller, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Young Leonard Watson has been accepted

Young Leonard Watson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:California travel ban has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:California travel ban. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Barnes (politician) has been accepted

Thomas Barnes (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Eagle-Herald

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Eagle-Herald".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Jay 💬 16:08, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Drafts

Hello, FloridaArmy,

I greatly appreciate all of the content creation work you do here on the project, you add a lot of articles to the encyclopedia that are valuable. But last October, BD2412 using AWB, edited all, or most, of your drafts resulting in 420 drafts that would have all expired during the hour of 18:00-19:00 UTC tomorrow. That's a lot of drafts for a few editors to review over a short period of time! I went to BD2412's talk page to discuss this situation and it seems to have resulted in these drafts being mass edited again and their deletion delayed for ANOTHER 6 months. So, unless circumstances change, we'll be dealing with this mass expiration all over again on April 12, 2024.

This is just a plea, I hope that over the next six months, a lot of these drafts can be edited and moved into the main space of the project. Or you could at least make some edits to them so they aren't all hitting their six month deadline on the same hour of the same day. I know those taking care of CSD G13s could be seen as on the opposite side as those editors who create drafts but I think we both want the same thing which is more quality content in the main space. Thanks again an good luck with all of these drafts! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Just my two cents here, but the six month rule is rather silly as a blanket rule. Some large groups of topics are obviously inherently notable but require work before they are suitable for mainspace, and it should be possible for those to remain in draft for a substantially longer period of time while they are worked through. BD2412 T 03:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi User:Liz. Thank you for your kind words. I have submitted as many as I am allowed. You or any other editor are free to review my AfC submissions or move notable draft subjects to mainspace. I do what I can. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Townsend-Wilkins House has been accepted

Townsend-Wilkins House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: California state-funded travel ban has been accepted

California state-funded travel ban, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wanda Sankary has been accepted

Wanda Sankary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sarah E. Kellogg. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jane Fearnley has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jane Fearnley. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George H. King (politician) has been accepted

George H. King (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Human Hearts has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Human Hearts. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:05, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I've responded to the comment you left. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 15:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Human Hearts (disambiguation) has been accepted

Human Hearts (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 17:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock City State Forest (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rock City State Forest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

I have clarified User:Robert McClenon. It is also possible to click on image to get more information and details on them. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Marvin Bileck

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marvin Bileck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: South Moon Under has been accepted

South Moon Under, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 00:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Owings Towne has been accepted

Edward Owings Towne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 13:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vivek Ramaswamy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chimera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rock City State Forest has been accepted

Rock City State Forest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Sometimes it takes the reviewer up to ten minutes to finish any indexing and redirecting. It would be a good idea to leave any new articles alone for a few minutes to avoid race conditions (known in Wikipedia as edit conflicts. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm finished now. Little Rock City has been made into a disambiguation page. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Roger wilco. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swan Island Dahlias (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swan Island Dahlias and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Crowther (author) has been accepted

Robert Crowther (author), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NP83 (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Robert Crowther (author) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert Crowther (author), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UtherSRG (talk) 12:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Crowther (author) (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by UtherSRG were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert Crowther (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

User:UtherSRG the cites include more than a dozen reviews from Kirkus Reviews and Publishers Weekly. Your assertion that there isn't independent sourcing is wildly false and you've moved an entry on an extraordinarily notable author to draftspace by mistake. Please fix your errors. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:18, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Check yourself and this draft, mate. The bio info is wholly unreferenced because the two references you used are not independent. With no valid references, the info can't be verified. With no verification, there's no way to credibly accept notability. All you need are some good sources. I know you know better than this. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of The Eton Boys for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Eton Boys is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eton Boys until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

X (talk) 20:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Crowther (author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Crowther (author). Thanks! asilvering (talk) 00:30, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Reed (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Amy Reed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juliet Takes a Breath has been accepted

Juliet Takes a Breath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Fearnley has been accepted

Jane Fearnley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Access to newspaper archives

Hi FloridaArmy, I have seen you comment here and there about "those that have access to newspapers sources" or "newspaper archives" should be able to find sources (ex. this comment). Maybe it is not your intent but it comes across as if you do not have access when you actually do, at least to ProQuest, Gale, Newspapers.com among others as they are part of the WP:Library package. At one time you did have request access to Newspapers.com but now it is now automatic. Letting you know in case you were not aware because such arguments may not be convincing to reviewers. S0091 (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wallace Kelly

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wallace Kelly, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Needs to be merged to Our Day. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Merged to film. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Policy Man (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Policy Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

In articlespace. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Thomas Reed (Alabama politician)

You think this is same bloke? Gives dates 1927-1997 [1] and see this as well [2] Think he died Oct 27, [3] Not sure where you got the middle initial from, can't see that in previews Hiding T 09:46, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thomas Reed (Alabama politician) has been accepted

Thomas Reed (Alabama politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hiding T 10:06, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

In articlespace. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Wilbur Hooker has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Wilbur Hooker. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:13, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wilburn Hooker has been accepted

Wilburn Hooker, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pud Graham has been accepted

Pud Graham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:38, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pete Rydolph (April 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pete Rydolph and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:George Moseley (politician)

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Moseley (politician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

In mainspace moved without leaving a redirect. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roy Milum has been accepted

Roy Milum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 14:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Armistead S. Pride has been accepted

Armistead S. Pride, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Clayton Gifford has been accepted

John Clayton Gifford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, FloridaArmy. Thank you for your work on John Clayton Gifford. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi there, nice work, I found a couple more sources and clarified a few of the questions you had left. Could you please check my work?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Brookhaven High School has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Brookhaven High School. Thanks! NP83 (talk) 10:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Scorpion tail has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Scorpion tail. Thanks! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 18:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)