Your submission at Articles for creation: Deniz Unay (September 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Emremer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 19:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deniz Unay (September 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deniz Unay (January 19)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chicdat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deniz Unay has been accepted

edit
 
Deniz Unay, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Deniz Unay for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deniz Unay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deniz Unay until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Participating in AfD

edit

Please do not add comments within the header information for an AfD. Add any new comments at the bottom of the page, and sign your messages. Please do other editors the courtesy of learning how to behave within discussions. Thank you. PamD 08:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

And if you are trying to produce a list of numbered points, either separate them with TWO line-returns, or use "#" at the start of each one to produce automatic numbering. If you want people to read your points, take the trouble to present them properly. Thanks. PamD 08:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

I've temporarily blocked you from making further edits to the AfD for a period of 14 days. Your behaviour was disruptive and was seriously hindering other users discussing the article. Nick (talk) 16:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Deniz Unay

edit

@Emremer: Deniz Unay has been deleted. 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 11:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Deniz Unay has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deniz Unay. Thanks! 🐔 Chicdat  Bawk to me! 12:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Deniz Unay

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Deniz Unay, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 12:56, 7 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Thronmax for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thronmax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thronmax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 14:33, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply