Your submission at Articles for creation: Saraikhet (March 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello sir don't lift this page if you find something wrong then edit it DotServer (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, DotServer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharatpedia edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bharatpedia, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 08:50, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello sir don't lift this page if you find something wrong then edit it DotServer (talk) 09:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Category:Indian Freedom Fighters has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Indian Freedom Fighters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Hemantha (talk) 09:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs to be re-written to adhere to WP:NPOV. It could also use more citations from reliable and independent sources. (?) Information that can't be neutral should be removed (neutrality is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –MJLTalk 23:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

If you translate from another Wikipedia, then you need to follow Help:translation. –MJLTalk 23:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank You So Much TheManishPanwar (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've advised the user not to barnstar themselves/their alternate accounts in the section below and on their main account — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:13, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rajput clans of Uttarakhand moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Rajput clans of Uttarakhand, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:29, 26 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alternate accounts edit

Hi. I understand that this is an alternate account WP:VALIDALT of TheManishPanwar (talk · contribs), disclosing that on your userpage is a good practice [1]. I'll remind you that using alternate accounts for illegitimate purposes is not allowed WP:SOCK. This is cross-posted on TheManishPanwar's talk page as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:03, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

P.S. If you have more alternate accounts, I'd advise disclosing them as well — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:04, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Cross-posting, this edit from TheManishPanwar giving barnstar to DotServer is wierd and I'd say personally that it's borderline illegitimate. Please do not repeat it again — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. I believe your use of multiple accounts has more than crossed the line 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:51, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

South Asian social groups edit

 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose discretionary sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

 

Hello DotServer. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DotServer. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DotServer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
It is abundantly clear that you are Manish Panwar, of the Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, and that you are, broadly construed, engaged in paid editing
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:DotServer, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DotServer|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

For Free Not a Paid Article It My Contributions DotServer (talk) 17:53, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Evidence has been presented to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar which suggests differently. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
You might not be "paid" to edit the article, but in case it's not clear, if you work for the Power Corporation, then you ARE a "paid editor" by Wikipedia's definition. I think the language or wording is maybe confusing you here. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 06:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
@DotServer Pinging for the above. 73.127.147.187 (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
 

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Pritam Bhartwan has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Email edit

To your email on 31 May asking for my [phone] number, no. Please keep discussions on the talk pages here — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:33, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kalpana Chauhan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Kalpana Chauhan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 10:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi DotServer! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, This is the user's total time behind me., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalpana Chauhan (June 19) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DIVINE was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DIVINE 📪 19:48, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali (June 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:33, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Draft:Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali edit

 

The page Draft:Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.rajputcommunity.in/t/chandra-singh-garhwali-chauhan-soldier-who-refused-to-fire-on-unarmed-people-and-became-a-freedom-fighter/953

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay (talk) 02:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

UTRS appeal #60203 edit

is closed. Let's discuss unblocking on your original account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unblock request edit

You'll need to use the template

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

to request unblocking, but you should request unblocking on your original account, user talk:TheManishPanwar. This account is blocked as a WP:sock puppet per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheManishPanwar. Thanks, --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, DotServer

Thank you for creating Gadkhark Malla.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

please add a source for the population

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Rajput clans of Uttarakhand edit

  Hello, DotServer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rajput clans of Uttarakhand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Kalpana Chauhan edit

  Hello, DotServer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kalpana Chauhan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Kalpana Chauhan edit

 

Hello, DotServer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kalpana Chauhan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply