User talk:CrowzRSA/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Discussion

Heya :) Please help reach consensus here. Its an easy vote, so don't get discouraged.--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:10, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Greetings

Hello Crowz, I was wondering, if you get the chance could you please comment at the peer review request for "When Love Takes Over" by David Guetta & Kelly Rowland? -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to comment. I have, I believe, addressed your concerns about the critical reception section and the the general fixes you recommended. If you could take a look at When_Love_Takes_Over#Critical_reception and tell me if that's more along the lines you were thinking. Additionally if there are no further comments to be made, can you please collapse your comments as other users on the peer review page did to show that the comments have been resolved. Once again thank you. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 23:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi Crowz!

Hi Crowz, welcome back again (though it's been more than three days, since you returned)! "Merry Christmas". How were your exams? Well, I am working on some articles, on my sandbox here. Well, if you could go through it and notify me of the mistakes, it'd be great. You can leave the comments here, if you want to. Thanks.. Novice7 | Talk 13:27, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

It's okay. "Merry Christmas to YOU". Novice7 | Talk 10:24, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, when you edit your talk page, there is a red link for Edit notice. Edit that and add what you want to warn others about. Voila! About review, it's okay Crowz. I've already nominated it for a GA :) Novice7 | Talk 03:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of John Rice Irwin

Hello! Your submission of John Rice Irwin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nyttend (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Let this Christmas bring you the gift of peace and joy! Merry Christmas :) Novice7 | Talk 04:12, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Joey Jordison/GA4

I have offered a thorough review, but I am afraid I have failed the article at this time. The article is really not ready for good article status, and needs some more work. I have left details on the review page. I am willing to offer another review once the issues have been dealt with, and I am available if you are looking for clarification on any of the points I have raised. Good luck, and I hope you've had a good Christmas. J Milburn (talk) 14:44, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

I did not quick-fail it, I failed it. I reviewed the article and concluded that it did not meet the GA criteria, and that it was not likely to very soon. I have given you a lot of stuff to work with, and, as I say, I would be happy to review it again once you have dealt with the issues I raised. If you feel I was wrong to fail it, you are welcome to request a second opinion, but I would strongly suspect the editor providing a second opinion would agree with me. In any case, as I say, I've given you a lot of stuff to work with concerning how to improve the article, so I hope, even if you do not want to nominate it at GAC again, the article can benefit from the process. J Milburn (talk) 18:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Jonas Mouton/GA1

Please review Talk:Jonas Mouton/GA1.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:35, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 23:05, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for signing the interest list. If you have any questions about it, please let me know.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 20:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Psychopathy Red redirect

Hi CrowzRSA, I just wanted to ask you about the Psychopathy Red redirect to World Painted Blood. Now I thinking that there was no page on it, wrote up a user draft for the article, but upon looking for the redirect, discovered that it was at one point a page in its own right until you established it as a redirect. Would you oppose me re-establishing it as a page in its own right? If not, on the basis of what? Thank you --L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Ok, although I probably have a wider definition of 'notability', I do still see your point. I would appreciate it if you would at least look over my userdraft ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:L1A1_FAL/Psychopathy_Red_%28song%29 )to see if you believe anything could be made of it (note that is/was a work in progress, however). I will respect your wishes, however, if you still see no reason to create an actual article on the song. Thank you --L1A1 FAL (talk) 03:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles 21:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for John Rice Irwin

Thanks from the DYK project Victuallers (talk) 02:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Decade of Aggression

The article Decade of Aggression you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Decade of Aggression for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Davenport, Iowa/archive3

Please revisit the page. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 18:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

All Hope Is Gone World Tour

Hi Crowz, I've reviewed All Hope Is Gone World Tour against GA criteria and placed on hold. I've left comments on the review page. Cavie78 (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey, because of the petty attitudes of some editors I've decided to leave Wikipedia but I will finish the GA review of All Hope Is Gone World Tour before I go. Give me a message when you've dealt with the four minor concerns I have left. Cavie78 (talk) 14:42, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Freak on a Leash

I'm reviewing this here for you.  狐 FOX  18:47, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I'm afraid I've had to fail the article for now. Reasons retailed on the page. Thanks,  狐 FOX  19:33, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eazy-E

Hi CrowzRSA I reviewed Eazy-E for GA, and its great, but just some minor corrections are needed for the GA criteria. You can view the page here --12george1 (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

Hey, I'm sorry to tell you that I quick failed the article The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria because of some outstanding issues, I left some errors left on the GA Review. Sorry =( --Blackjacks101 (talk) 22:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

I posted my response to your comments on the Review page, my opinion remains that it is not ready for GA.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 01:09, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Can you please visit the community review page at: Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria/1 and actually specify why you asked for a community review? Then other users will be able to actually tailor their comments more specifically to your concerns. In the meantime I've left some comments at the review page about why User:Blackjacks101 may have failed the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 13:10, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

There were a few more thing's I've noted following your changes. If you can fix them then I won't really have any issue in saying I support the article's transition to GA. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 20:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I've broken it down really simple for you ... cause references can be a little tricky. I want to give my approval for GA promotion so if you can fix the four-five issues I'm happy. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 02:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Korn (band)

Hello CrowzRSA, I will be reviweing the above article. Its a bummer dude that you had to wait for so long, but I will get started on it. On a first look, there are some issues which I am not happy about, which can lead to its quick fail. I will do my best so that the hibby-gibby of the above section does not come. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:02, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Life Is Peachy sampler.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Life Is Peachy sampler.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:30, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, CrowzRSA. You have new messages at Talk:Chase_XCG-20/GA1#GA_Review.
Message added 18:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your GA nomination of (sic)nesses

The article (sic)nesses you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:(sic)nesses for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

There is just the release date and genre comment left to address, then I will list it. I also suggest putting the chart refs next to the name of the chart, rather than the peak position, to avoid clutter. Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Live Undead

The article Live Undead you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Live Undead for eventual comments about the article. Well done! SMasters (talk) 13:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Kepler nominations

Hi, CrowzRSA. Thanks for reviewing the Kepler star articles I nominated. I never considered the idea of putting such an article up to FA, but I'll think about giving it a shot sometime in the future. I remember seeing Tau Ceti on the Main Page a couple days ago. Ooh, the prospects are dazzling. :D --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alternative Press logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Alternative Press logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

The image is now orphaned because the website is apparently displaying their name as "Alt Press" now instead of "Alternative Press", so I uploaded a new logo which displays that name. If you'd like to chat, please contact me on my userpage. :) Banaticus (talk) 17:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Outstanding GA reviews

Nothing much is happening with the two reviews you've started for my articles. If you're bogged down in RL issues I can find other people to finish them if necessary. Let me know if this would be helpful for you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:55, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, at first I just delayed it but now I do have some stuff goin on, but I ought to be able to finish/start the reviews by wednesday. CrowzRSA 06:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eazy-Duz-It

The article Eazy-Duz-It you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Eazy-Duz-It for things which need to be addressed. SMasters (talk) 10:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eazy-Duz-It

The article Eazy-Duz-It you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Eazy-Duz-It for eventual comments about the article. Well done! SMasters (talk) 13:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Korn (album)

The article Korn (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Korn (album) for things which need to be addressed. SMasters (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Wired All Wrong

Just wanted to ask you if you could upload a picture on the Wired All Wrong Wiki page. I have no idea how to. Thanks for contributing to so many great pages! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axl023 (talk • contribs) 18:46, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Korn (album)

The article Korn (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Korn (album) for eventual comments about the article. Well done! SMasters (talk) 04:01, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject God Lives Underwater

Wikipedia:WikiProject God Lives Underwater, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject God Lives Underwater and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject God Lives Underwater during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive

On behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, we would like to take the time and thank you for your contributions made as part of the March 2011 Good articles backlog elimination drive. Awards and barnstars will go out shortly for those who have reviewed a certain number of articles.

During the backlog drive, in the month of March 2011,

• 522 GA nominations were undertaken.
• 423 GA nominations passed.
• 72 GA nominations failed.
• 27 GA nominations were on hold.

We started the GA backlog elimination drive with 378 GA nominations remaining, with 291 that were not reviewed at all. By 2:00, April 1, 2011, the backlog was at 171 GA nominations, with 100 that were left unreviewed.

At the start of the drive, the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 101 days (Andrei Kirilenko (politician), at 20 November 2010, reviewed and passed 1 March 2011); at the end of the drive the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 39 days (Gery Chico, at 24 February 2011, still yet to be reviewed as of this posting).

While we did not achieve the objective of getting the backlog of outstanding GA nominations down to below 50, we reduced the GA backlog by over half. The GA reviews also seemed to be of a higher quality and have consistently led, to say the least, to marginal improvements to those articles (although there were significant improvements to many, even on the some of the nominations that were failed).

If you would like to comment on the drive itself and maybe even make suggestions on how to improve the next one, please make a comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011#Feedback. Another GA backlog elimination drive is being planned for later this year, tentatively for September or October 2011. Also, if you have any comments or remarks on how to improve the Good article process in general, Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles can always use some feedback at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles.

Again, on behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, thank you for making the March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive a success.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

March 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive award

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For reviewing 5 or more Good article nominations during this past March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive, I hereby award you The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar. Good job! –MuZemike 17:24, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Vinyl Conflict

The article The Vinyl Conflict you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Vinyl Conflict for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dead Memories3.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dead Memories3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Cannabis

Welcome to WikiProject Cannabis! This project has so much potential, especially since it has so many members. Unfortunately, the project is pretty inactive. Any help you would be able to provide would be much appreciated! Feel free to post any suggestion, questions or comments on the project's talk page. --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:East Huaxia Road (Shanghai Metro)/GA1

I have replied to your comments. — PCB 22:47, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Cobalt/GA1

Hello? This review has been left for a rather long time. Just a quick note. :-) Lanthanum-138 (talk) 06:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Cobalt GA Review

Hi! Anything new with the Cobalt GA Review? --Stone (talk) 15:09, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!--Stone (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Have we addressed al your concerns? --Stone (talk) 12:41, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I hope all your exams went well! --Stone (talk) 10:08, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!--Stone (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Bucket bong GA review

Hi, CrowzRSA. I've put initial comments at Talk:Bucket bong/GA1. --Philcha (talk) 11:59, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Nadia Ali

Hi, I saw your name on the peer review page and I was wondering if you could please help me out? I have listed the article for singer-songwriter Nadia Ali for a peer review. I have been working on it recently with help from others and would appreciate some feedback on what further improvements could be done to get it to a Good Article status. Thanks! Hassan514 (talk) 04:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, sorry to bug you again but if it's possible if you could please give some feedback on the Nadia Ali peer review. I would definitely appreciate some feedback on improving the article to a good article status and on the work I have done. Hassan514 (talk) 16:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I should be able to get to it tomorrow. CrowzRSA 00:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your comments, I haven't made all the changes, which you suggested since I was already in the middle of making changes the other reviewer had suggested but I have replied to the comments you made because I have some questions regarding source such as Facebook and Myspace. Also, I have added a lot more background in her early years section. Could you please have a look at that when you have time?Hassan514 (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Slayer - Soundtrack to the Apocalypse (side).jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slayer - Soundtrack to the Apocalypse (side).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

GA Getty Conservation Institute

Thank you for passing the GA review. However, you did not change the GA template on the talk page to close the review. Will you be doing this or should I do it? Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 00:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Many thanks! Racepacket (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

GA Nomination of Live Intrusion

Hi! I've reviewed Live Intrusion, which you posted at GAN a little whiles back. I've put the article on hold for the next seven days to allow for responses and fixes. The link to the review is here. AJona1992 (talk) 21:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, CrowzRSA. You have new messages at Talk:Live Intrusion.
Message added 19:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GA Legal history of cannabis in the United States

I have placed the review on hold so that you can address a few minor items. Racepacket (talk) 21:37, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Just a reminder that I am looking for you to respond to the items raised in the review. Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 10:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

We are very close to finishing. Let us rap this up, please. Racepacket (talk) 08:09, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Well done on the GA! --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:40, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2-Arachidonyl glyceryl ether you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to a few days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Tea with toast (話) 21:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

FTC

Think you'll get more support at your Slayer nom if you follow my suggestion (removing the songs and adding Reign in Blood and Christ Illusion into subtopics instead). igordebraga ≠ 19:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

AFD Live Intrusion

Hi, I nominated this article for deletion here. Hekerui (talk) 00:39, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Korn Everything I've Known.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Korn Everything I've Known.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:35, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:WikiWizard.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:WikiWizard.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://fantasy.mrugala.net/J.%20W.%20Baker/. As a copyright violation, File:WikiWizard.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:WikiWizard.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:WikiWizard.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:WikiWizard.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:WikiWizard.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Darwinius (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Questionable GA review practices

You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Two_Hearted_River/Sandbox3. You are receiving this message because you are one of the twelve editors I have identified concerning questionable GA review practices. Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 03:56, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza Hut logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pizza Hut logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.— Moe ε 21:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Discussion on linking to streamed copies of albums

Wikipedia policy allows us to link to legal streamed copies of albums. It would be useful to draw up a guideline on how and when to link to such albums; however, there is concern that it may not be appropriate as the music would not be available in all parts of the world. Is the benefit of having access to the music for most users outweighed by the fact that some users will follow a link to find the music is not playable in their region? Your view would be helpful at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 02:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

File:We Got the Beat Alternative Cover.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:We Got the Beat Alternative Cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Slipknot Us Bonus.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Slipknot Us Bonus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 07:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Slipknot Demo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Slipknot Demo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 07:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Korn-Coming Undone.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Korn-Coming Undone.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:The Guitar All-Stars - Wait and Bleed- The Slipknot Sessions.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:The Guitar All-Stars - Wait and Bleed- The Slipknot Sessions.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:54, 30 March 2013 (UTC)