User talk:Cremastra/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scolopendra dehaani has been accepted

Scolopendra dehaani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 16:44, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Congrats! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 22:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Edward-Woodrow! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Zopherus jourdani redirect, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scolopendra japonica has been accepted

Scolopendra japonica, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 15:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scolopendra galapagoensis has been accepted

Scolopendra galapagoensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 11:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asanada has been accepted

Asanada, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 06:19, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rowland M. Shelley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Rowland M. Shelley, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 17:45, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asanada agharkari has been accepted

Asanada agharkari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ultimate leg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ultimate leg, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:36, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you for creating the page Rhaebus gebleri. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Edward-Woodrow. Thank you for your work on Arthrorhabdus. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 18:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleurostigmomorpha has been accepted

Pleurostigmomorpha, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Asparagusus (interaction) 17:12, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cicindela (Calomera) littoralis has been accepted

Cicindela (Calomera) littoralis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

KylieTastic (talk) 13:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhynchobdellida, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Collins. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centipede

Hi, you will see from the article history that I recently made a substantial number of edits to the article, in preparation for GAN, only to be stalled by the proposed merger. I see that in the past week you removed the merge tag from this article and immediately then nominated it at GAN. I am of course glad that the merger has gone away, thank you. I see that you have made some edits to the article. Perhaps the best thing now given my contributions to the article's reshaping and my earlier intentions would be if I might be listed as co-nom for the GAN. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:42, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Of course. I'll make the change right away. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Songora people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bantu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Suggest bot

Edward-Woodrow (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
29		Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test (talk)	Add sources
21		Anti Terrorism Court of Pakistan (talk)	Add sources
109		Dendrobranchiata (talk)	Add sources
4		Yīng (talk)	Add sources
76		Australia's Naughtiest Home Videos (talk)	Add sources
9		Gui (ancestral surname) (talk)	Add sources
84		Telugu grammar (talk)	Cleanup
6		Si (surname 姒) (talk)	Cleanup
3		Waldo L. Schmitt (talk)	Cleanup
787		Economy of Malaysia (talk)	Expand
89		Old Norse morphology (talk)	Expand
135		2022 in Ukraine (talk)	Expand
756		Yellowfin tuna (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
108		Lena Park (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
55		Bulgarian grammar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
478		The Wire (India) (talk)	Merge
9		Vasanta College for Women (talk)	Merge
64		Invincible ignorance (Catholic theology) (talk)	Merge
49		Okyeame Kwame (talk)	Wikify
99		Danish grammar (talk)	Wikify
12		Aluminium in Africa (talk)	Wikify
10		Bullgod (talk)	Orphan
2		Mark van der Giezen (talk)	Orphan
6		Sindh Mohajir Punjabi Pathan Muttahida Mahaz (talk)	Orphan
4		Iniistius (talk)	Stub
14		Iniistius umbrilatus (talk)	Stub
14		Iniistius spilonotus (talk)	Stub
2		Iniistius trivittatus (talk)	Stub
12		Ligiidae (talk)	Stub
15		Iniistius twistii (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Princisia vanwaerebeki has been accepted

Princisia vanwaerebeki, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Nalepella is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:46, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I am honoured. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:32, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centipede

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Centipede you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Centipede

The article Centipede you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Centipede for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Eppstein -- David Eppstein (talk) 07:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

SuggestBot

Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:02, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet. The study is scheduled to end on Monday, January 9, 2023. Please note this is a bit later than the initial estimate specified in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1		Borsonia mitromorphoides (talk)	Add sources
6		Covina-Valley Unified School District (talk)	Add sources
123		Economy of North Macedonia (talk)	Add sources
141		La Adelita (talk)	Add sources
9		Vorkriegsjugend (talk)	Add sources
748		Nguyễn dynasty (talk)	Add sources
373		Economy of Morocco (talk)	Cleanup
61		Energy in Vietnam (talk)	Cleanup
5,295		Economy of Singapore (talk)	Cleanup
147		Economy of Tunisia (talk)	Expand
1,211		Economy of the Philippines (talk)	Expand
138		Geography of Venezuela (talk)	Expand
117		Economy of Mozambique (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
20		Modernization under Haile Selassie (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46		Ancient accounts of Homer (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
8		Imperial Natural History Museum (talk)	Merge
85		Battles of Bohorodychne and Krasnopillia (talk)	Merge
5		Concha Revolution (talk)	Merge
52		Feminism in Latin America (talk)	Wikify
339		Visa requirements for Serbian citizens (talk)	Wikify
118		Coherent (operating system) (talk)	Wikify
72		Sabal brazoriensis (talk)	Orphan
4		Angélique Gérard (talk)	Orphan
2		VugaPay (talk)	Orphan
1		Granulomelon adcockianum (talk)	Stub
7		March Revolution (Ecuador) (talk)	Stub
2		Granulomelon (talk)	Stub
2		Basedowena (talk)	Stub
2		Pleuroxia (talk)	Stub
60		Provinces of Eritrea (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:07, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Edward-Woodrow. Thank you for your work on Geothermobacterium ferrireducens. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Article looks great; thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 00:55, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Rugeley Page

Hi, I recently made some small changes to the Rugeley page, and you reverted them despite it just being grammatical fixes, adding links, and adjusting the details of a local event. I'm new to the site and not sure how to restore my edits, so any help would be appreciated; thanks in advance! MollyTrigg (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC) MollyTrigg (talk) 19:49, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

@MollyTrigg: I apologize, the claims you added to the article were supported in the original source, which I failed to check. Entirely my fault. You can re-add them to the article by clicking the "undo" button next to my edit (in the version history, which you access via the "View History" tab. Sorry! Facepalm Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the quick reply! MollyTrigg (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Meares Glacier

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Meares Glacier, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:36, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

A message from 216.4.115.200

The Aibd Farhadi edit was made as the content is inaccurate and cites a blog as the source. 

216.4.115.200 (talk) 20:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank-you for the explanation. Regardless, it is helpful if you leave an edit summary, so that other editors- like me- aren't confused by your edits. Edward-Woodrow (talk) 20:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Balanoglossus gigas

On 9 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Balanoglossus gigas, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the acorn worm Balanoglossus gigas gives a strong iodoform-like smell when handled, possibly to ward off predators? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Balanoglossus gigas. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Balanoglossus gigas), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Centipede and its subsidiary articles

Hi, just a note: there was quite an extensive discussion about having the centipede article separately from its subsidiary Orders. This was resolved with an agreement that we did not want to have the Orders discussed in any detail up at Centipede, so it would be very much appreciated if you could respect that decision. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

My apologies. I suppose I misinterpreted the agreement. Nevertheless, the differences between the two subclasses shouldn't really be adressed at Pleurostigmomorpha, which was an unhelpful stub. Should that content be transferred to Orders of centipedes? Again, it shouldn't be at Pleurostigmomorpha, when it was, it comprised the bulk of the content there. It would make more sense for the differences between the two subclasses to be handled at a parent page, similar to what @Animalparty said during the merger discussion. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 17:30, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for leading the way

I had trouble earlier trying to create a WP:RSPS shortcut [1] as you recently made [2]. I knew I needed to create a redirect but wasn't sure of what other templates I needed or other steps to take. I looked at your edit history and was glad I could just copy off of you. Cheers. _signed, Willondon (talk) 22:10, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

@Willondon: thank-you... I pretty much copied the template off the other entries though. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 22:13, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

a government in exile page

Hello dear sir , I am parwiz ahmadi. I seen your edits in Government in exile page. I submitted an article Draft:United states of khorasan. unfortunately other admins do not know much more about a government in exile. this is about several time that several admins declined my submission and asked me that what's a government in exile? I hope you review this article , If it seems to be approved. please approve it

thank you so much for your cooperation Parwiz ahmadi (talk) 18:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

@Parwiz ahmadi:First of all, I am not an admin, merely a volunteer Articles for Creation reviewer. I will leave reviewing your draft to someone with more expertise in the topic area... I only edited Government in exile because I happened to come across a disruptive edit that I removed. Also, to be fair to all draft creators, I won't review submissions on request, but just pick some randomly. Edward-Woodrow :) _[talk] 20:30, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Odontorrhina

On 23 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Odontorrhina, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that all species of the genus Odontorrhina are covered with dense bristly hairs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Odontorrhina. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Odontorrhina), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Edward-Woodrow. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

• Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
• If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
• Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. – Joe (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)