Welcome! edit

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Faizabad Junction railway station does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  — DaxServer (talk · contribs) 10:46, 28 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sindhiya Amad Karari moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sindhiya Amad Karari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ItcouldbepossibleTalk 03:27, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sindhiya Amad Karari (February 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wgullyn was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Wgullyn (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Aj.abhishek1998! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sindhiya Amad Karari moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sindhiya Amad Karari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Khgk (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sindhiya amad karari moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sindhiya amad karari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 05:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please stop making changes to Indian place names against consensus edit

First of all, welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Since you started in January, I have noticed that a recurring theme in some of your edits is to update names of cities, districts, and other related names in articles to their official name, such as attempting to change Faizabad to Ayodhya in this edit to Faizabad (Lok Sabha constituency) on January 28. Your edit was undone an hour later, because Wikipedia does not rely on the official names, but generally uses the WP:COMMON NAME to identify a topic. This is determined by consensus of interested and participating editors on the Talk page of the article concerned. In the case of the article Faizabad district, you can see the current consensus here; in the case of the article Faizabad division, the current consensus is here, and extends to all "Faizabad" articles. Most recently, in this edit, you changed "Allahabad" to "Prayagraj" at the Allahabad article; this was undone within ten minutes, once again due to observance of WP:COMMONNAME and consensus (here). The reverting editor observed that you "must have seen the big red notice... please do not change Allahabad to Prayagraj in this article". Indeed, you must have seen it, and yet you ignored it and changed the article anyway. If this is repeated, it could be seen as disruptive, so please don't do that.

In addition, you unilaterally moved the article Faizabad Junction railway station to Ayodhya Cantt Station and changed the names in the article to match; once again, your changes were rapidly undone. Making a controversial move of an article to another name without gaining consensus first on the Talk page of the article is contrary to our page move guidelines, especially so when there are all these other issues surrounding it, and multiple Rfc's confirming it. Moving a page while having the knowledge to observe all the requirements is more of an advanced skill at Wikipedia; going forward, I'd recommend that you not make any further page moves of articles until you are more familiar with the guidelines. Instead, start a discussion at the Talk page first, proposing your move, and follow WP:RM#CM for any move you wish to make.

You are still a new editor, so you get a certain amount of latitude as you come on board and learn the policies and guidelines here, because making mistakes is how you learn. But after having your page move undone and your name changes repeatedly reverted by multiple editors, you should begin to understand now that your changes of this nature do not have support from the community, so please stop making them. By adding this message to your page, I wanted to make this explicit. If you have questions about any of this, or about any editing topic at Wikipedia, feel free to contact me. You can also seek answers to your questions at the India-related topics Noticeboard, or at the Wikipedia WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 20:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EDM fan 2 (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is a place of Varanasi ghat Aj.abhishek1998 (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:34, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi (May 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 01:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Sindhiya Amad Karari edit

  Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sindhiya Amad Karari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998

Thank you for creating Bharwari railway station.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please continue to develop the article in draft space. It cannot be in main space as it is.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 14:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've had to move this back to drafts, because the article is unreferenced with no indication of notability per WP:GNG. The only other alternative would have been to have it deleted, but I thought maybe you would like to continue working on it? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please STOP moving pages edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Allahabad Fort, you may be blocked from editing.
You have moved several pages without discussion + contrary to WP:COMMONNAME - these will all have to be moved back, so please STOP moving pages - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Allahabad Airport.  LeoFrank  Talk 02:51, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have made a change because of i watch the entire airport which is situated in Bamrauli. and there is no single board are available related to Allahabad airport. The entry board is also name Prayagraj airport so i updated this page name because of this. people are now know this as prayagraj airport and bamrauli airport. Aj.abhishek1998 (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
This is the official verified Twitter handle of prayagraj airport.
https://twitter.com/aaiprayagraj?t=5_XeoA7q4w6Z1k76IiLcDw&s=09
This is the details provided by AAI about Prayagraj airport.
https://www.aai.aero/en/airports/prayagraj Aj.abhishek1998 (talk) 03:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kaushambi district, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
As repeatedly explained to you we use the WP:COMMONNAME in English. NOT the WP:OFFICIALNAME - Arjayay (talk) 12:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kaushambi district‎. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 06:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for WP:DISRUPTION per talk page warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sindhiya amad karari edit

 

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sindhiya amad karari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 15 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Durgawati Devi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaushambi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 15 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Bharwari railway station edit

  Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bharwari railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Bharwari railway station edit

 

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bharwari railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi edit

  Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi edit

 

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shriram Sharma Acharya Ghat Varanasi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sindhiya amad karari moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Sindhiya amad karari, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of किलनहाई नदी edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on किलनहाई नदी, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as Hindi, an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 12:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion nomination of "किलनहाई नदी" edit

 

किलनहाई नदी, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content, or remove the speedy deletion tag from the page. You can contest the deletion by clicking the "Contest this speedy deletion" button inside the speedy deletion tag. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:31, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to किलनहाई नदी—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:41, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Kilanhai River edit

Hello Aj.abhishek1998, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Kilanhai River, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kilanhai River.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Grahaml35}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Grahaml35 (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sindhiya amad karari edit

 

Hello, Aj.abhishek1998. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sindhiya amad karari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply