Talk:Zhiar Ali

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zhiar Ali article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Zhiar Ali has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 31, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 July 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on August 24, 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Animal rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock music Low‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Infobox edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hey @Nikkimaria:! Can you explain why you removed the infobox which retreieves from Wikidata in this edit? I think it's better if it's sourced from Wikidata.--Épine (talk) 11:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Why do you think that? The local version has more information. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nikkimaria, because they are sourced and some information is not even necessary to be present in the infobox. Épine (talk) 12:19, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

What information do you feel is not necessary? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:20, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nikkimaria, the only info not present in the Wikidata template are nationality, IPA transcription, and organizations. This information is already reflected in the lead and body of the article. I know infobox is to sum up the article, but that information is not important to be summed up. Épine (talk) 12:54, 11 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Singer-songwriter? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The lead mentions he is a singer-songwriter, but the article does not contain any information about his musical career. He does seem to have a presence on Reverbnation, can that be referred to in the article?--Folkloria (talk) 23:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Passed. DimensionalFusion (talk) 20:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Zhiar Ali/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: DimensionalFusion (talk · contribs) 17:54, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article looks good to not quickfail, sooo I'm gonna get right into reviewing!

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Prose is clear and concise, easily understandable to a broad audience. SPaG appears to be broadly correct from what I could spot of it
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The article meets MoS guidance for the lead section and layout, and all other MoS components
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Article provides a references list which is formatted consistently within the article
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	The article uses reliable citations that back up claims. Self Citation check: 1,3,5,7,14,15,16,36,64,65
	2c. it contains no original research.	All claims are cited inline
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Other than the quote (which doesn't count), I don't see any copyvios present within the article
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Article addresses the main aspects of the person in an appropriate detail.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Article does not go into unnecessary detail and is focused on the topic.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Article obeys NPOV, did not see any violations of it
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Article does not change dramatically on a day to day basis.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are tagged with copyright status
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	All images are captioned appropriately for their content and are relevent to the person
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic