Talk:Weaves (EP)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Bearcat in topic Split proposal

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Weaves (EP)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MarioSoulTruthFan (talk · contribs) 14:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply


Hello, I'm MarioSoulTruthFan and I will be reviewing this article over the next days, please hold on any fixes until I say so. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:45, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Infobox edit

  • Reference for Indie pop genre? Should also be in the composition

Lead edit

  • the other third having production from David Newfeld → re-word
  • Should make a reference of each single, don' say only "EP was promoted with four singles,"
  • The same goes for the music videos and do you know the name of the tour?
    • The source I cited for the tour didn't really give the name of the tour, so I can't say. Named the music videos also editorEهեইдအ😎 03:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Production and composition edit

  • Flawless.

Promotion edit

Critical reception edit

Track listing edit

  • All songs written and composed by Jasmyn Burke and Morgan Waters. → All songs written by Jasmyn Burke and Morgan Waters and produced by them excepted when noted. + add a source
    • Burke didn't produce any of the tracks, so I'm not going to add "produced by them excepted when noted" in this case. Also added source.

Sorry, my bad. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 20:20, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Credits and personnel edit

Release history edit

Why two sources?

References edit

  • Fine.

Overall GA review edit

@EditorE: I've completed the review, I'll put it on hold for a week, once you have adressed the issues I raised please ping me.

  • @MarioSoulTruthFan: All comments have been addressed. These reviews have been great and very useful in improving my other content as well.

Thanks, glad to see that I'm doing a difference here and there. Passing MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 21:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Split proposal edit

Technically speaking, an album is not allowed to have an article at all until after the band that recorded it already have an article about the band — and overdoing the content so that the album's article is simultaneously serving as a quasi-band article is not an appropriate way around that condition. And the other problem here is that the band now have a Juno and Polaris nominated album under their belt. This article MUST be split so that the band content is in a band article instead of background in an article about an album whose creators don't actually have a band article at all. Bearcat (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply