Talk:Vistara

Focus city status for Mumbai?

Vistara already operating 7 daily departures from Mumbai to Delhi (5 dep) and Ahmedabad (2 dep), recently announced flight to Bangalore as well, effective from 16 June 2015. As per the Focus city definitions, Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai likely to attain focus city status in Vistara's network. - M.soumen (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vistara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: RegistryKey (talk · contribs) 06:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Criteria

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

Further information: WP:WIAGA

A good article is—

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and

(c) it contains no original research.

3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Review

1. Well-written:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (prose)	Typos and grammatical errors.	Fail
(b) (MoS)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

2. Verifiable with no original research:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (references)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass
(b) (citations to reliable sources)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass
(c) (original research)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

3. Broad in its coverage:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (major aspects)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass
(b) (focused)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Notes	Result
The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Notes	Result
The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Criteria	Notes	Result
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)	The reviewer has no notes here.	Pass

Result

Result	Notes
Fail	See discussion below.

Discussion

A well-written article, however the history and fleet sections need to be further refined to fix grammar, typos, sentence fragments, and particularly in the history section, the opening statement could use a bit more context to explain how Vistara came about from an airline merger before.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Vistara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150923163220/https://www.airvistara.com/trip/sites/default/files/pdf/flight-schedule.pdf to https://www.airvistara.com/trip/sites/default/files/pdf/flight-schedule.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vistara/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• Is it possible to remove citations from the lead? All facts of lead should be mentioned in the main text also; I feel the citations should be in the main text only
  • Not necessarily. MOS:LEAD says not to include citations in the lead if the sourced statements there are cited elsewhere in the article.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

All I wish to say is that we should have all the facts from the lead in the main text of the article. There is no reason we can not. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:26, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, but you cannot require something that is not clearly written in any policy. In particular, this is one of the cases. It is perfectly valid to have citations in the lead section.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

I request this in most of my reviews, because when I was a learner others asked me to do so. I understand your point. I am not adamant on this, I always allow the nominator to decide in cases like this. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 03:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Therefore I suggest anyone working on improving the article towards gaining GA status to disregard this suggestion of yours.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:09, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

We may have conflicting opinions, but let us not continue our argument. I see the nominator has considered it better to remove the citations. It is their choice. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 03:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, because they might have thought that not doing so would make you fail the nomination. You must clearly state here that this point is not a requirement for GA nominations.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:00, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, will clarify that. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 04:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

• Tata Sons and Singapore Airlines Links
• Delhi and Mumbai Links
• As of 03 2016 What does this mean? Write properly
• a fleet of 9 Airbus A320-200 aircraft According to MoS all numbers below 10 are generally to be written in words. Check this throughout the article

History

• mid 1990s Hyphen
• You may link foreign direct investment
• Say any one of % or percent or per cent throughout the article
• a combined $100 million You can use money conversion template
• brand identity Vistara Vistara-->"Vistara"
• The airline will initially operate from level 4 of the terminal, which is being used by international carriers. From July 2015, it will be shifted to level 3, which when complete will be dedicated to domestic carriers This has become the past now
• Vistara inaugurated 'Aviation Security Training Institute' an in-house institute --> Vistara inaugurated the Aviation Security Training Institute, an in-house institute

Corporate affairs

• Link satellite city
• as chief commercial officer --> as the chief commercial officer
• (CCO), both are with Singapore Airlines background. --> (CCO)-both are with Singapore Airlines background.
• Initially it started out with a three-member board comprising Swee Wah Mak, Mukund Rajan and Prasad Menon, a Tata group veteran, as chairman --> Initially it started out with a three-member board comprising Swee Wah Mak, Mukund Rajan and Prasad Menon (a Tata group veteran), with the latter as chairman
• Who are Swee Wah Mak, Mukund Rajan, Som Mittal and Sangeeta Pendurkar?
• introducing 2 new members 2 in words, as per MoS
• ₹5 billion convert

Destinations

• As of 03 2016 Write properly
• You can delete the "Ref" column in the table and put the ref. simply at the end of the line preceding the table

Fleet

• As of 03 2016 Write properly
• The airline plans to take delivery of all 13 A320ceo by March 2016 and 7 A320neo of its initial order by 2018. I think it should be Airbus A320ceo and Airbus A320neo
• Vistara CEO Phee Teik Yeoh You have already introduced him, you can simply write "Phee Teik Yeoh"
• and to launch international flights within two years "to" is not needed

Services

Needs much copyediting as follows:

• Being a full-service carrier Vistara --> Being a full-service carrier, Vistara
• 4 rows in 2-2 configuration --> four rows in 2-2 configuration
• A320-200 fleet --> Airbus A320-200 fleet
• The business class seats are 20.12 inches wide with 42 inches seat pitch Convert templates
• Currently, there are no LCD screens attached with seats but it provides pre-loaded tablets for its business-class fliers' Source?
• Link LCD, tablets
• introduce the class Mention the class by name
• 6 rows in 3-3 configuration 6 in words
• Each being 18 inch wide and of 33 to 36 inches pitch Form a proper sentence. Convert templates needed. What is pitch?
• As of now Vistara's A320 aircraft don't have in-flight entertainment screens installed. When is now? don't --> do not
• A320 aircraft Airbus A320-200
• Vistara will beam content directly to passenger's personal electronic devices (tablet and smart phones) through one-way Wi-Fi connection on board "will"? When? Or hasi t started doing so? WiFi-->Wi-Fi
• For business class passenger the airline provides pre-loaded tablets as an interim solution Fact repeated from earlier section. It is sourced here but not earlier
• Taj hotels group h in capital
• options of 1 veg, 1 non-veg dishes in economy class, 2 veg, 1 non-veg in premium economy and 2 veg, 2 non-veg dishes for business-class cabin numbers in words, use semicolons
• in partnership with GVK has introduced --> in partnership with GVK, has introduced
• from Mumbai T2 terminal "the"

Frequent-flyer program

• No bold needed, including caption
• frequent-flyer program, it operates semicolon not comma

• In ref. 50, date retrieved?

M.soumen, I saw just now that you have already made most of the changes I recommended. Good. So, here I list the few remaining issues to make work easier: Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 16:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

• History: a combined $100 million You can use money conversion template. Not compulsory though.
• Service:

• The business class seats are 20.12 inches wide with 42 inches seat pitch Convert templates
• The fact about pre-loaded tablets is repeated in Business class and In-flight entertainment
• Could "tablet" be linked?
• Vistara will beam content directly to passenger's personal electronic devices (tablet and smart phones) through one-way Wi-Fi connection on board "will"? When? Or hasi t started doing so? WiFi-->Wi-Fi
• Refrain from saying "now" or "currently". Please mention the time referred to.
• Currently Vistara's A320 aircraft don't have in-flight entertainment screens installed. This still needs to mention which time is being referred to. You can say "as of 2016".
• ...through one-way Wi-Fi connection on board WiFi-->Wi-Fi
• Taj hotels group h in capital
• options of 1 veg, 1 non-veg dishes in economy class, 2 veg, 1 non-veg in premium economy and 2 veg, 2 non-veg dishes for business-class cabin numbers in words

M.soumen, can you find some time for this? Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 10:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

@M.soumen: Please try to respond within five days. If response is delayed by more than five days, I shall be forced to fail this article. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sainsf: Have made the changes you have suggested and cleaned the references. Think, now its good to go!Magentic Manifestations (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Magentic Manifestations! You are indeed helpful. The article looks good to go. I am happy to promote this. Excellent work! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 06:15, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Interline

No article lists these, its looking like a fan wanting o show off with interlnes over code shares which Vistarar only has four, so remove non code shares.Mustangmanxxx (talk) 15:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Vistara

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Fails neutrality criteria ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:19, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

2016 listing which fails criterion 4 (neutrality). Article is overly promotional, especially in the services section, but also elsewhere. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Delist quite some text that could come straight out of an advertisement. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:57, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A321LR Seat Layout

Vistara on their website show the different seating arrangements of their A320neo and 787-9 aircraft while having no separate layout for the A321LR. Doesn’t that confirm the A321neo having the same seating layout as the A321LR? After all the difference between the two aircraft is just 3 auxiliary fuel tanks and exactly the same when it comes to the interior. Thank You. AlphaBravo178 (talk) 14:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

The A321LR is not included in the above website.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:58, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Boeing 787 new delivery

Vistara has received its 5th aircraft on 1 September 2023. The detailed fleet information of the airline can be found here - https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Vistara, I do not see why the edits related to this fleet information addition amounts to unconstructive edits. @Jetstreamer has made multiple reverts to it, hence the topic shall be discussed here.

Also @LeoFrank to call this an edit made without original research, that may amount to a review that the user made without them doing the research here - Anyways for the reference the links for "research" may be viewed here - 1) https://www.flightera.net/en/airline/Vistara

2) https://twitter.com/airvistara/status/1697876453780840915 3) https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-787-9-dreamliner-vt-tso-vistara/epw5ko Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Also here -

4) https://italiavola.com/2023/09/03/india-si-alla-fusione-air-india-e-vistara/ Thewikizoomer (talk) 08:50, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Planespotters is not a reliable source. And, for the record, let me tell you that I am quite uncomfortable with you starting a discussion at WP:ANI when it is clear that you do not understand the process of citing sources.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Premium Economy Configuration

On my last flight I was surprised and research shows that it seems Vistara is the only airline that has in some plains for long haul flights in the premium Economy Claus the same seats and confirmation as in economy class. This seems to be a specific aspect and business concept of Vistara and should be addressed more specificly. In 2024, does both configurations 2-3-2 and 3-3-3 exist in parallel? Dein Vater (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Planes. Separately, I reverted your recent edits to the article as unsourced.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)