Talk:Thomas Muthee

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MBUSHIstory in topic Why is lede unintelligibly worded
Former good article nomineeThomas Muthee was a Philosophy and religion good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 24, 2008Articles for deletionKept
December 31, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Bishop

edit

The article asserted, with no source at all, that this man is a bishop. Of what diocese? When was he consecrated, and by which bishops? It isn't enough to just call him a bishop, you actually have to back that up. I'm removing it.

Per request from User:66.188.198.88 here are a pair of already cited (negative) sources that call Muthee a Bishop. [1] and [2]--Cube lurker (talk) 18:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Saying there is a source is not the same as actually putting it it the text. You haven't even addressed my questions at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.198.88 (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

If reliable sources say he's a bishop, he's a bishop. Notice this section of the Bishop article. Bishop#Others. Apparently and by sources he's a bishop in the Word of Faith Church. It's not my cup of tea. But if reliable sources say he's a bishop. Who are we to say "Not good enough for me."--Cube lurker (talk) 18:20, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Since this point has not been responded too, I'm going to act on the asumption that my point has been accepted, and return the article to it's pre-dispute state. If i'm mistaken I will not re-revert any further, but will attempt to solicit other opinions.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nowhere in the article does it assert that he's a Roman Catholic bishop. That would be kind of odd, given that he's very open about having a wife, and has no identified previous Episcopal background. Jclemens (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

New Material

edit

Some links were broken. Others were restored. I did the best I could on little sleep at way-too-early-o'clock. Regards. FangedFaerie (Talk | Edits) 09:12, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Muthee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thomas Muthee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Thomas Muthee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Why is lede unintelligibly worded

edit

"Came under specific scrutiny"? What's that supposed to mean? He's a real life witch hunter who wrecked lives, & whose activities were financed by Sarah Palin after she found out. Why are these facts being masked with bizarre wording? MBUSHIstory (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2023 (UTC)Reply