Talk:Sverker the Elder

Latest comment: 6 days ago by Favonian in topic Requested move 9 June 2024

Children of Sverker

edit

According to my reference (Lindström, 2006) Sverker had the following children:

This list is much different from the information in the article which is therefore either wrong or needs references. As my book is not citing any references itself, I feel reluctant to add the list above to the article.
/ Mats Halldin (talk) 12:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Sweartgar I" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Sweartgar I has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Sweartgar I until a consensus is reached. signed, Rosguill talk 18:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Sweartgar I of Sweden" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Sweartgar I of Sweden has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Sweartgar I of Sweden until a consensus is reached. signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Sweartgar the Elder" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Sweartgar the Elder has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 4 § Sweartgar the Elder until a consensus is reached. signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 9 June 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Favonian (talk) 10:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


– The territorial designation should be removed per WP:CONCISE and WP:NCROY. There is no risk of confusion since the name is unique to Swedish kings. The possible pairs of titles are then either Sverker I and Sverker II, or Sverker the Elder and Sverker the Younger. I am suggesting to use Elder/Younger forms here for aesthetic reasons, but I am also fine with Sverker I and Sverker II, as they seem to be equally common in literature. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 04:57, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.