Talk:Stranger Things/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Shawn Levy Hints at Season 5 and Beyond

I have a source which clearly states that Shawn Levy (the executive producer of the series, and therefore a very notable opinion) considers the show running to four season being almost certain, and running to five season being highly likely. I have tried to include to in the page twice, but it has been removed both times. Can we get some consensus as to whether this is relevant information?

Given that equally vague claims made by the Duffer Brothers have been included, I don't see why we should ignore what the executive producer says.

You can read about here: http://screenrant.com/stranger-things-season-5-possibility/ Whovian99 (talk) 00:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Visual Effects

In the second paragraph of this section there is quite a lot of text without much reference. Can we back this up with more sources to project an accurate description? Thanks. --Adrianfaziooo (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

It is all coming from the "Art of the Title" reference at the end of the para. You could sprinkle one or two more uses of that if you think necessary, but generally as long as the next following ref supports it within a para, that amount of "space" without a ref is fine. --MASEM (t) 21:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Homage

The second paragraph says that this show is an "homage": "channeling the works" of a variety of famous filmmakers and writers. This is never expanded upon later. What does it mean exactly? In what way is does it "channel" these works? Wolfdog (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

I changed it to 'inspired by'. That seems a little clearer.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:23, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

The problem isn't the wording. It's a major part of the show and it deserves a more thorough explanation, rather than just listing things. Popcornduff (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

If that's the case, then I agree it requires expansion. In the meantime, though, it seems to be that "inspired by" makes more sense than the confusing "homage". Wolfdog (talk)

On this topic, the exhaustive footnotes of influential works in the lead are inappropriate, as they are essentially editor POV of which specific works may or may not have influenced the show. The well-cited sentence about influences is enough, and individual works can be listed in a future "Influences" section, assuming they are mentioned in reliable sources (which several are). I've preserved the info here, as it may be helpful and someone spent a lot of time compiling it:

• Steven Spielberg: Jaws (1975), Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977), Indiana Jones (first appeared in 1981), E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982), Poltergeist (1982, directed by Tobe Hooper, written and produced by Spielberg), The Goonies (1985, directed by Richard Donner, from a story by executive producer Spielberg), Minority Report (2002), Super 8 (2011, directed by J. J. Abrams and produced by Spielberg).
• John Carpenter: Assault on Precinct 13 (1976), Halloween (1978), The Fog (1980), The Thing (1982), They Live (1988).
• Stephen King: Carrie (1974), Firestarter (1980).
• George Lucas: Star Wars (released in 1977), in particular The Empire Strikes Back (1980, directed by Irvin Kershner).
• Others: Ridley Scott's Alien (1979), Stanley Kubrick's The Shining (1980), Joy Division's song "Atmosphere" (1980), Ken Russell's Altered States (1980), Sam Raimi's The Evil Dead (1981), David Cronenberg's Scanners (1981) and Videodrome (1983), Spielberg camera operator Michael Chapman's All the Right Moves and Paul Brickman's Risky Business (both of 1983 and with Tom Cruise as protagonist), Wes Craven's A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), Rob Reiner's Stand by Me (1986), Marshall Brickman's The Manhattan Project (1986), the X-Men comics, the two J. R. R. Tolkien's novels The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings, up to Jonathan Glazer's Under the Skin (2013).

Of course, notable influences can be parroted in the lead summary as well, once the individual section has been established.— TAnthony^Talk 16:36, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

The movie Stand By Me also influenced one episode. I had added this to the article but my edit was deleted. Others have also pointed out that the scene of the youngsters trekking along an old railway line in search of their friend Will is reminiscent of similar scenes in the 1986 Stand By Me (film) where four friends search for the dead body of a missing child.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/on-demand/0/stranger-things-all-the-hidden-and-not-so-hidden-references-in-p/stand-by-me/ |newspaper=Telegraph |location=London, England |date=August 7, 2016 Peter K Burian (talk) 15:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

With all these "hommages" and "influences", nobody has even mentioned the big white elephant in the room so far, which is that Stranger Things is one giant, blatant rip-off of the film Beyond the Black Rainbow (2010) in time setting (1983!), mood, photography, lighting, soundtrack, etc., even down to how it's an hommage to all things horror and sci-fi cult from the 70s and 80s. Heck, if you look at the strongly externally sourced list of film influences from the 70s and 80s in BtBR's German article (Kubrick, Carpenter, Cronenberg, Ken Russell, BtBR soundtrack writer Schmidt has also pointed out the similarities and parallels to Risky Business, and other reviews not used for the German Wikipedia article also mention 1980s Stephen King films and Tobe Hooper), it reads like a copy-paste from the list you guys here have amassed for Stranger Things.

It's so blatantly obvious that not only do people make side-by-side comparisons on YouTube and Vimeo where the Duffers have pretty much done shot-by-shot recreations of BtBR, reviews also discuss the strong influence that BtBR has over Stranger Things, and even the Duffers themselves have to talk about it in interviews because all the people who've seen BtBR are calling them out over it: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] This also goes for the Under the skin connection, as that was one of the first films to come out after BtBR to be obviously influenced by it. As you can see from the linked interview, one of the Duffer brothers admits to having seen BtBR and how the side-by-side comparisons totally look like they've utterly ripped it off, while the other brother flat-out, adamantly denies any BtBR connection or even just awareness that the film even just exists at all (which is a bit like the white elephant with BtBR, which is that its director Cosmatos keeps denying it has anything to do with Kubrick at all and yet all the reviews of BtBR are full of Kubrick comparisons and people say things about BtBR like, "Kubrick called, he wants his style back!").

So, if you're gonna write about any such things as "hommages" and "influences" in this article, Beyond the Black Rainbow must be mentioned at the very top of the list among influences to be named in the article, if even just because the Duffers themselves are questioned about it in interviews and reviews mention the issue of how similar the series is to BtBR. --79.242.203.134 (talk) 01:15, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Given the Hollywood Reporter article, they clearly state that any homages they did to it were unintentional - Only Matt watched it, and only once. It's fair to mention BtBR as well as DARYL in that light as unintentional homages people found, but it can't be stated as a clear influence source. --MASEM (t) 01:48, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Fine by me. I just feel that this article can never be complete without mention of BtBR and how similar the series is according to a number of reviewers. Even if I personally think that the one Duffer brother is not very honest when he calls it unintentional and subconscious (just like Cosmatos does with Kubrick), but my personal opinion upon his honesty doesn't matter for the article. --79.242.203.134 (talk) 12:10, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Color for episode tables

The color of the episode tables for Season 1 and Season 2 are both shades of red and look quite similar. I know that this color matches the color of the posters for the two seasons, however it seems a bit odd that the color is so similar. I thought it was fine before when the Season 2 table was black. Any thoughts? Whovian99 (talk) 22:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Black is not a prominent colour on the season posters, so no, black should not be used. The reds are not identical and are clearly different, so the used of them is acceptable. -- Alex^TW 22:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 October 2017

In the accolades section, there is one box not filled. It is under MTV Movie & TV Awards for TV Show of the Year. It should be filled with Stranger Things. 2601:584:301:8700:8C59:DCF0:9F1A:92B0 (talk) 22:52, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

 Done - Brojam (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Sean Astin/Bob

For those of you done with Season 2, do we want to just put Sean as (Season 2), rather than Season 2-present)? Since it's more accurate?--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 02:58, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2017

Change: In the lab, the pack of adolescent creatures emerge from the tunnels and overrun the interior of the facility, killing most of the people inside. Mike convinces Joyce to sedate Will, as he's under the control of the shadow monster, so sedating him will remove its ability to track them. Mike, Will, Joyce, Hopper, Bob and Owens are trapped in the lab's security room as the creatures rampage through the lab, and the power goes out. Billy and Max's parents discover that Max is missing, and Billy's abusive father orders him to find her. With the power off, the building goes into lockdown; Bob goes down to the lab's basement to reset the circuit breakers, while Owens monitors him from the security room. Nancy and Jonathan arrive at the lab, where they meet up with Steve, Dustin, Lucas and Max. Bob resets the breakers, bringing the lab's power back online, after which he's able to unlock the doors and the outer gate. The group inside, with the exception of Owens, are able to escape from the lab, but Bob is killed by the creatures. The group go to the Byers home to plan their next move; Mike realizes that the shadow monster is controlling the smaller creatures, the vines, and Will. They reason that if they can kill the shadow monster, everything it controls will die as well. To prevent Will from alerting the monster to their location, they remodel the interior of his tool shed so that he can't tell where he is. Will awakens and initially panics, but Joyce, Jonathan and Mike are able to get through to him, and he taps out a message in Morse code: "CLOSE GATE". Unfortunately, the house phone rings, alerting both Will and the shadow monster to their location. The group barricade themselves inside the house as a group of the creatures arrive; however, Eleven arrives and kills the attacking creatures.

To: In the lab, the pack of adolescent creatures emerge from the tunnels and overrun the interior of the facility, killing most of the people inside. Mike convinces Joyce to sedate Will, as he's under the control of the shadow monster. Mike, Will, Joyce, Hopper, Bob and Owens are trapped in the lab's security room as the creatures rampage through the lab, and the power goes out. Billy and Max's parents discover that Max is missing, and Billy's abusive father orders him to find her. With the power off, the building goes into lockdown; Bob goes to reset the circuit breakers. Nancy and Jonathan arrive at the lab, where they meet up with Steve, Dustin, Lucas and Max. Bob resets the breakers and unlocks the outer doors and gate. The group inside, with the exception of Owens, are able to escape from the lab, but Bob is killed by the creatures. The group go to the Byers home to plan their next move; Mike realizes that the shadow monster is controlling the smaller creatures, the vines, and Will. They reason that if they can kill the shadow monster, everything it controls will die as well. To prevent Will from alerting the monster to their location, they remodel the interior of his tool shed so that he can't tell where he is. Will awakens and is still possessed, but Joyce, Jonathan and Mike are able to get through to him, and he taps out a message in Morse code: "CLOSE GATE". Unfortunately, the house phone rings, alerting both Will and the shadow monster to their location. The group barricade themselves inside the house as a group of the creatures arrive; however, Eleven arrives and kills the attacking creatures. 192.232.15.250 (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Specific edits requested are not clear, and still over the plot limit of WP:TVPLOT. -- Alex^TW 05:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Season 1, episode 5 needs an edit.

In the entry for S1 e5, the line,"Mike, Lucas, and Dustin, with Eleven's help, determine Will is trapped an alternate dimension..." needs the word in inserted between trapped and alternate dimension.

 Done --MASEM (t) 00:07, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Character/Actor breakdown

The following is a breakdown of the cast and characters as they appear in the series. They are ordered by their first appearance, with additional appearances noted next to their name. Distinction is made between "Also starring" and "Co-starring" credit. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Cast list

Opening credits/Starring Season 1 Winona Ryder, David Harbour, Finn Wolfhard, Millie Bobby Brown, Gaten Matarazzo, Caleb McLaughlin, Natalia Dyer, Charlie Heaton, Cara Buono, Matthew Modine Season 2 Winona Ryder, David Harbour, Finn Wolfhard, Millie Bobby Brown, Gaten Matarazzo, Caleb McLaughlin, Noah Schnapp, Sadie Sink, Natalia Dyer, Charlie Heaton, Joe Keery, Dacre Montgomery, Cara Buono, Sean Astin, Paul Riser, Matthew Modine (credited immediately after episodes ends, when he appears) Guest stars 101 Also starring Joe Chrest as Ted Wheeler 101 102 103 (possibly appeared, not credited) 104 105 106 107 108 201 202 204 205 209 Rob Morgan as Officer Powell 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 201 202 203 Ross Partridge as Lonnie Byers 101 (credited but did not appear) 102 104 105 Shannon Purser as Barbara Holland 101 102 103 202 John Paul Reynolds as Officer Callahan 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108; following credited as John Reynolds 201 202 203 Mark Steger as the Monster 101 102 103 105 106 108 Chris Sullivan as Benny Hammond 101 102 Co-starring Andrew Benator as elevator scientist 101 105 106 Stefanie Butler as Cynthia 101 102 David Dwyer as Earl 101 102 Catherine Dyer as Agent Connie Frazier 101 102 106 107 108 Salem Hadeed-Murphy as high school principal 101 104 Randy Havens as Mr. Clarke 101 102 104 105 106 107; the following are Also starring credit 201 203 204 209 Hugh Holub as scientist 101 103 105 106 Tobias Jeliner as lead agent 101 102 105 106 107 108 Cade Jones as James 101 103 104 106 Anniston and Tinsley Price as Holly Wheeler 101 102 103 106 107; the following are only credited to Tinsley 201 202 204 Anthony Reynolds as agent 101 Susan Shalhoub Larkin as Florence 101 102 105 106 107 108 201 203 204 Tony Vaughn as Principal Coleman 101 104 105 201 Peyton Wich as Troy 101 103 104 106 107 Brenda Wood as local newswoman 101 102 Co-starring Charles Lawlor as Mr. Melvald 102 103 105 201 Bethan Anne Lind as Sandra 102 Chester Rushing as Tommy H. 102 103 106 107; the following credited as Also starring 202 203 204 Chelsea Talmadge as Carol 102 103 106 107; the following credited as Also starring 201 202 Robert Walker-Branchaud as agent repairman 102 105 106 107 103 Co-starring Glennellen Anderson as Nicole 103 106 201 Cynthia Barrett as Mrs. Holland 103 201 203 209 Pete Burris as Hawkins head of security 103 105 108 Miles Mussenden as M.P. officer Patrick 103 Ron Rogge as state trooper O'Bannon 103 104 Sierra Vemeyer as Ally 103 Christi Waldon as Marissa 103 203 104 Co-starring Danny Boushbel as English teacher 104 Jason Davis as test subject 104 Arthur Lee Dozier V as Greg McCorkie 104 Ron Fallica as state trooper 104 Marianne Fraulo as Patty 104 Adam Gagan as ground controller 104 Jon Kohler as funeral director 104 Shawn Levy as morgue worker 104 Christopher Cody Robinson as test pilot Shepard 104 Paul Ryden as field reporter 104 Mark Withers as Gary 104 105 Co-starring Bill Eudaly as Pastor Charles 105 Kaylee Glover as Jennifer Hayes 105 Andre Pushkin as Russian man 105 Jerri Tubbs as Diane Hopper 105 108 106 Also starring Aimee Mullins as Terry Ives 103 (co-starring credit) 106 204 205 207 209 Amy Seimetz as Becky Ives 106 205 207 Co-starring Adam Boyer as hunting store owner 106 Linda Kang as female clerk 106 Kevin Patrick Murphy as grocery store manager 106 Chase Stokes as Reed 106 107 Co-starring Shae Britt as Mary Mack Girl #2 107 Jackie Dallas as Jen 107 Charles Green as movie theater manager 107 Amy Parrish as Troy's mom 107 Abigail Whitlock as Mary Mack Girl #1 107 108 Co-starring Lucius Baston as technician 108 Elle Graham as Sara Hopper 108 201 Also starring Linnea Berthelsen as Kali 201 207 209 Catherine Curtin as Claudia Henderson 201 202 203 204 205 209 Brett Gelman as Murray 201 205 206 208 Kai L. Green as Funshine 201 207 James Landry Hébert as Axel 201 207 Anna Jacoby-Heron as Dottie 201 207 Gabrielle Maiden as Mick 201 207 Co-starring Alan Boell as Adams 201 207 Gilbert Glenn Brown as cop #4 201 Matty Cardarople as Keith 201 205 Madelyn Cline as Tina 201 202 Abigail Cowan as Vicki 201 203 Brian F. Durkin as cop #1 201 Joe Davison as nerdy tech 201 202 206 208 Lauren Halperin as Dr. Owen's assistant 201 Christopher Johnson as cop #2 201 Fenton Lawless as Merril 201 David A. MacDonald as flamethrower soldier 201 204 Aaron Muñoz as Mr. Holland 201 209 Miguel Young as TV reporter 201 202 Co-starring Sam Ashby as werewolf 202 203 Lynne Ashe as happy homeowner 202 203 Tonya Bludsworth as government agent #1 202 Danny Boyd, Jr. as grandkid 202 Karen Ceesay as Mrs. Sinclair 202 205 Jim E. Chandler as government agent #2 202 Priah Ferguson as Erica Sinclair 202 205 206 209 Shea Jones as goth girl Samantha 202 John Paul Marston as government agent #4 202 Shannon Mayers as government agent #5 Al Mitchell as Eugene 202 Cameron Newton as Jason Voorhees 202 203 Desmond Phillips as government agent #6 202 Cody Land Pressley as drunk teen #1 202 Drew Scheid as drunk teen #2/sweaty teen boy 202 203 204 Alex Van as hunter 202 Andrew Wilson Williams as scary clown 202 203 203 Co-starring Harper Cavanaugh as young girl 203 Bethany DeZelle as mother 203 Suzanne Jordan Roush as Doris (MS receptionist) 203 Donna Wright as elderly math teacher 203 209 204 Co-starring James DuMont as middle aged man 204 205 Also starring Pruitt Taylor Vince as Ray 205 207 Co-starring Kerry Cahill as staff nurse Caitlin 205 Cory Chapman as lab technician 205 Paul Vincent Freeman as security guard 205 207 Virginia Kirby as motel owner 205 Arnell Powell as Mr. Sinclair 205 Ben Taylor as friendly trucker 205 206 Co-starring Helen Abell as radar tech 206 208 Brian Brightman as M.P. guard #1 206 208 Kristopher Charles as M.P. guard #2 206 208 Sheena Kharazmi as exam room nurse 206 Mary Kraft as ER doctor 206 Brian LaFontaine as doctor #2 206 Wendel A. Matthews as lead rift soldier 206 Brandon O'Dell as neurologist 206 Vince Pisani as doctor #1 206 Michael Shenefelt as rift solider #2 206 207 Co-starring Avis-Marie Barnes as elderly woman 207 Keith Brooks as gas station clerk 207 Jarrett Michael as swat member #1 207 Vanathi Kalai Parthiban as young Kali 207 Thomas Tull as man on street 207 Wes Kidd as swat member #2 207 PJ McDonnell as mentally ill man 207 208 Also starring Will Chase as Neil Hargrove 208 Co-starring Jennifer Marshall as Susan Hargrove 208 209 209 Co-starring Sydney Bullock as Stacey 209 Marcelle LeBlanc as cute girl 209 Orelon Sidney as TV reporter 209

Semi-protected edit request on 1 November 2017

• Kai L. Green as Funshine, a member of Kali's crew. to * Kai L. Greene as Funshine, a member of Kali's crew. Syrelyre (talk) 21:04, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Done —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Separate pages for seasons 1 & 2.

Now that season 2 has released, shouldn't there be separate pages for each season? There are for other series, like Game of Thrones and House of Cards. Disneyisatale (talk) 10:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I think there should be. However, there needs to be sufficient information that the page could discuss. Until the episode summaries for Season 2 are complete, we should hold off on creating separate pages. We also need to make a "List of Stranger Things episodes" page as is the norm with most TV series - including the two you mentioned. Whovian99 (talk) 22:32, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

It should definitely not be split off to a separate episodes article just yet; see the discussion currently ongoing at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Television#List of episodes - when to split. The series only has 17 episodes, there's not enough to move. If you believe that they need to be split into separate season articles, then the best place to do that is in the draft namespace first, at Draft:Stranger Things (season 1) and Draft:Stranger Things (season 2). -- Alex^TW 22:40, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

@AlexTheWhovian Where do you draw the line though? Some shows have seperate pages for seasons even though they don't have many episodes. Resurrection only has two seasons, 21 episodes in total (8 for Season 1, 13 for Season 2), was cancelled, and has nowhere near as much following as Stranger Things and yet has separate pages for the seasons (see Resurrection (season 1) and Resurrection (season 2)). It also has a List of Resurrection episodes page. Whovian99 (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

If you want to ping someone, use {{replyto}}. Those definitely need to be merged back into one article. -- Alex^TW 02:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Title of Seasons

This page currently lists the two seasons as Season 1 and Season 2, which is the norm for TV shows. However, Netflix officially refers to them as Stranger Things (for Season 1) and Stranger Things 2 (for Season 2), in much the same way a movie would be titled. Both Netflix and The Duffer Brothers have made it clear that this was their intention.

Netflix usually refers to their shows as Season 1, Season 2, etc... House of Cards is an example, as seen on Netflix's official site: https://www.netflix.com/au/title/70178217

However, for Stranger Things they have deliberately refereed to the seasons in the way I mentioned: https://www.netflix.com/au/title/80057281

Shouldn't this page refer to the seasons as the creators and production company intended? Whovian99 (talk) 03:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

I would say it's fine as it is, as the title of Stranger Things 2 is noted elsewhere in the article. If they were named with different titles such as the seasons listed at List of American Horror Story episodes, then yes. However given that this is just Title 1 and Title 2, fitting Wikipedia's manual of style here is more fitting. -- Alex^TW 04:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

OK, good point. Thank you. Whovian99 (talk) 04:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 6 November 2017

Summary of Season 2 Episode 7 includes the line "trying to EXTRACT revenge on former Hawkins lab scientists for what they did to her." : this is grammatically incorrect. It should read ", trying to EXACT revenge on former Hawkins lab scientists for what they did to her", as revenge is exacted, not extracted. 97.121.2.234 (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done - thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 19:56, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Separating out the accolades

Since there's no apparent talk page discussion we need to have one over this edit warring whether the accolades should be split or not.

Right now, there is no WP:SIZE problem, in that we're under 100k of text even with accolades so there really is no need for a separate article yet on those. However, if this show gets a 3rd season (which seems highly likely but probably won't be committed until closer to Oct-Nov) then we are going to start reaching that limit. At which point we then need to split off information, and the most reasonable and consistent candidates for this would be to create either a separate list of episodes article or a per-season set of articles. In other words, the accolades would be the last thing to consider pulling out at this point, so I believe this split is far too premature. Now, maybe if Stranger Things gets to 10 seasons and we have much more dev and reception info, and a consistent list of award nominations, then the accolades as a separate list makes sense (even after accounting for removing the episode/seasons to separate articles), but not now. --MASEM (t) 13:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I really could not care less. But I vote for Separating. - AffeL (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Please read the site's guidelines and policies; we do not vote. I agree with Masem; it is too early to move the content into a separate article. The reverter of my edits, the above editor, is simply doing so due to the disagreeances at Talk:Westworld (TV series)/Archive 1#Separate award article?, and does not understand WP:BOLD, and the fact that that the move was bold and is the edit that needs the consensus, not the revert. Alex|The|Whovian^? 13:57, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I am the editor who separated out the accolades section, my thinking was that the show keeps getting more nominations for the first season, and if the trend continues into the second season it is going to make the original article quite long, so I thought it would be a good idea to preemptively separate the accolades section. I didn't mean to cause problems, I had thought to add something to the talk page this morning, but I see it caused problems overnight, next time I will try to add my reasoning to the talk page asap. Kingstoken (talk) 14:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

You followed the proper process for WP:BOLD, it's just the revert cycle that's an issue, so there's nothing wrong with what you did. --MASEM (t) 15:53, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

It just got reverted again. I'm thinking we should keep the table on the main page and keep a link to the list of awards and nominations article, and at some point in the future a final decision can be made, but for now it would stop the editing and reversing. Kingstoken (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

That was an okay thought Kingstoken, but it is unnecessarily redundant to have the info both here and in a separate article, when consensus is still not to split at this time. I have removed the "see also" template as such. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I would like to bring up the idea of splitting the main article and creating a separate page for awards again. If season 2 is anything like season one there should a lot of nominations. And according to WP:SIZE this article has already reached a size were splitting would be recommended. Now I see that some there has been some revisions and undoing of those revisions recently, plus my awards article was reviewed. If we could come to some consensus that would be appreciated. Kingstoken (talk) 18:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

147,285 bytes as of now (and over 4,8 million views in the last month). Seems to me a split would be welcome, if the episode list is to stay (it's lengthy, but someone said in another discussion that it's not long enough according to some guide). Saturnalia0 (talk) 13:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Rotten Tomatoes score

The article states in the critical reception section that the first season received a 96% from 68 reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. This has now gone down to 94% due to a new review being added, making a total of 69 reviews.

Also, though the season 2 score hasn't changed, it now has 109 reviews, not 104. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:210:D700:F161:1527:A9A8:D4C4 (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

 Done I updated the numbers in the article. Rfl0216 (talk) 20:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 14 November 2017

92.11.106.184 (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 20:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Where's Murky?

Why is Murky, Barb's sister, stated in this? They spoke of her in Episode 1 and 2... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riverpease1503 (talk • contribs) 18:08, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Page for characters?

With S2 down, I think we can talk about the possibility of creating a page for characters. HOWEVER we need to keep it away from fluff such pages get. The reason I think we can create a page is that nearly all the main characters have been give multiple secondary sources about them or how they are actored/written (more than just their role in the series), particularly with S2 down, El, Joyce, Hopper, Barb and Bob, as a short list to start. If we keep it to the key main characters (the boys, Joyce, Hopper, El, Max, Nancy, Jonathan, Steve, Dr. Brenner, Dr. Owens, Bob, Barb, and the big-bads) and keep the others as mentioned when they come key in these character's stories (eg with El, that would be someone like Terry), then we can avoid the usual fluff pieces around this types of lists. --MASEM (t) 15:47, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Masem: I'd like to throw my hat in to help with this. I've been trying to figure out a good way to organize the cast list with all the recurring characters but it's more and more complicated every time I come back. The current format of separating them by when they're introduced is making the section incredibly overlong, and there are too many characters to accurately sum up in a smaller space. Main cast definitely belongs on the main article, but I think a characters page would be great. Sock (tock talk) 18:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Masem and Sock: If you both did not notice, in the section above this, I created a character breakdown for the series. During my rewatch of season 1 before starting season 2, I figured it would be a good idea to track characters/actors as they are credited and how. So all that info is there. Creating that was the first step in pushing for a stand alone character list. The reason I did this was only because a character list did not already exist. But I wholeheartedly agree this article should just be the "main/starring" actors, and we can essentially move what is here now, to a list of characters, to expand upon them as needed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:05, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Do consider that for cast, at some point, we may have separate season pages for episodes (I'm trying to judge how S2 is being received). If that happens, then the cast list for the main page should be limited to main (listed in title credit) stars with cast lists then spun to the season pages. That won't affect this envisioned character page.

As for the character page, I suggest we start a draft page, as to set a style for it before other editors get involved. --MASEM (t) 23:42, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93 and Masem: I've gone ahead and taken the liberty: Draft:List of Stranger Things characters. I've only done the cast tables for the time being, but I'll continue working on it tomorrow. Sock (tock talk) 00:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

@Sock: That draft looks really good and exactly what I was envisioning for a start to expand from. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:32, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Looks good, but concerning the overview table, please note that per WP:TVCAST, Cast tables [...] should not be used for programs with fewer than three seasons or where cast changes are minimal, and A separate cast table for recurring cast can be included in articles listing characters and cast. -- Alex^TW 02:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@AlexTheWhovian: FWIW, that section of MOS:TV is for "main", season, and episode article, so the part about the table would apply to this article (if there was one), not the List of characters article being created. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of that, but the second quote applies to the List of characters article - it states that tables for recurring cast should be separate from the table for main cast when concerning a List of characters article. -- Alex^TW 02:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

I was poking around online for some potential sources to help with the individual character descriptions when I happened upon the standalone Wikia for Stranger Things. They have some extremely detailed character pages, i.e. the one for Joyce, and I think they can be very useful in building the character summaries. Thoughts? SomethingToTellYou (talk)

Just like Wikipedia, they can be used as a reference, and we can use the sources provided in the Wikia if they conform to Wikipedia's guidelines, but we cannot copy content from there to here. There also seems to be very little real-world content provided in the article you gave. -- Alex^TW 20:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Whatever happened to the mid-1980s?

The article states that the series is set in the "early 1980s" but surely his is partly incorrect? The first series definitely is early 1980s - for ease of reference the 1980s are usually sub-sectioned: Early: 1980, '81, '82, '83. The second series takes place in late 1984 - and surely this is the mid-1980s? Decades are usually sub-sectioned 'mid' with the 4, 5 and 6 years and 'late' with the 7, 8, 9 years. As the setting of the second series is late 1984, the decade is rapidly approaching five years old! Just something to be considered...

(Ethel D (talk) 13:22, 27 November 2017 (UTC))

Semi-protected edit request on 12 December 2017

On the picture of David Harbour, change "Sheriff" to "Chief." 73.237.108.120 (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Done DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 04:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Error

Looks like this page had been hacked in some way. The content of the page is there but there's a transparent overlay redirecting to a youtube video.

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYntVKsbvFM" rel="nofollow"><img alt="Transparent Square Tiles Texture.png" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Transparent_Square_Tiles_Texture.png" width="9001" height="8215" data-file-width="252" data-file-height="230"></a> <img alt="Transparent Square Tiles Texture.png" src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/24/Transparent_Square_Tiles_Texture.png" width="9001" height="8215" data-file-width="252" data-file-height="230">

I've purged the page, issue seems to have gone. -- Alex^TW 04:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Science Fiction?

This is SF the same way It is a film about Clown Science. SF elements are vastly subordinated to horror elements.

Is there a source independent of the creator (who might have motives to lie for marketing reasons)? - 91.10.55.47 (talk) 11:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

As per WP, Horror is defined as "a genre of fiction which is intended to, or has the capacity to frighten, scare, disgust, or startle its readers or viewers by inducing feelings of horror and terror". Sci-Fi is defined as "a genre of speculative fiction, typically dealing with imaginative concepts such as futuristic science and technology, space travel, time travel, faster than light travel, parallel universes, and extraterrestrial life".

Your comment that the horror elements outweigh the SF elements is just plain incorrect. The show can be scary, but I never got the impression that its primary goal was to scare the audience. The SF elements are much more present, especially "parallel universes" (The Upside Down) and "extraterrestrial life" (The Demogorgon and The Mind Flayer). These elements form the basis of the show, the horror elements are far more incidental.

As for It, the WP page for that film refers to as "supernatural horror". The supernatural genre is defined as "a genre of literary and media fiction exploiting or requiring as plot devices or themes some contradictions of the commonplace natural world and materialist assumptions about it". While admittedly there is an overlap between SF and supernatural, the difference is pretty clear. The Demogorgon is an extraterrestrial that mostly abides to the laws of the natural world - it moves and acts like an animal, and although is has some supernatural ability, it isn't magical and it can't do everything. Pennywise (for clarity, I won't refer to it as "It" even though that's its real name) on the other hand, doesn't exist in the physical plain in the same way as humans. It can seemingly teleport, read minds, control living and dead animals, change its form, exist on multiple plains at once and many more. Pennywise isn't an animal, it's a supernatural being (this is much clearly if you'd read the book by Stephen King). The Demogorgon is mostly a real and understandable creature that in theory could exist. Pennywise is not. For that reason, Stranger Things is science fiction, It is supernatural.

Also, it doesn't matter if the creators have a conflict on interest. They are the creators, and they are the ultimate authority on their work no matter what. Whovian99 (talk) 02:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Creators are the ultimate authority? So if Spielberg would say that Schindler's List was a comedy, we all had to laugh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.10.5.34 (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2018‎

Yeah, I don't think that it works that way. - 91.10.5.34 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you. --Miaow 16:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

The original pitch for the show was as a "sci-fi horror epic" (see the Production section of the article for the source of this). The show meets the definition of both sci-fi and horror, as I discussed above. If the creators tried to convince us that it was a genre it clearly wasn't (e.g. if they said they considered it a gritty crime drama), then we might question their opinion. But when most people agree that the show has both SF and horror elements, there is no reason to not listen to what the intent of the creators was. Whovian99 (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Google Assistance Game - "Hey Google! Talk to Dustin from Stranger Things"

There should be a section on the Stranger Things Google Game. It's setup like a text-adventure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobj2008 (talk • contribs) 15:25, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Spanish Version is More Specific

The English version states that the series is American, whereas the Spanish Version says it's from the United States of America -which is just one of the 35 countries in the American continent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.47.59.66 (talk) 01:29, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

The lead says "American" and the infobox says "United States". That's how it's done on the English WP. I recommend seeing MOS:TVLEAD and American (word). --Musdan77 (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Article splitting

I don't see this discussed before. With the size of this article, I don't know why the list of episodes hasn't already been split to its own article. Actually, the awards section is very long and definitely could be split off, but usually a "list of episodes" page is created by this time for a series. --Musdan77 (talk) 05:01, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Accolades splitting has been discussed before. So has splitting for seasons. I could agree with splitting for seasons, and having summary-less tables transcluded here from those articles, but certainly not a separate episode article for only seventeen episodes. -- Alex^TW 05:12, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Splitting the accolades could be reconsidered given the table is now much larger, and takes up quite a bit of the page (at least in my browser). S.A. Julio (talk) 07:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Agreed. -- Alex^TW 08:08, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

I'd support the exploration of season and an accolades article. But as Alex stated, there wouldn't really need to be a separate LoE given there have only been 17 total episode, no where near an amount necessary to warrant a split. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:27, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

[edit conflict] Going back into the archives, I saw that there was also a suggestion of starting a "list of characters" article. So, that's three possibilities. But, yeah, a "Awards and nominations" split would be a good start. I guess I could do it – if that's agreeable. --Musdan77 (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

We already have a working article of the list of characters at Draft:List of Stranger Things characters. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:45, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Lead, etc.

After my April 19 edit, an editor re-added what I removed from the lead (diff), without giving an edit summary. I went to his user page to explain my reasoning for removal. After about 2½ days with no reply, I'm bringing it here (which I guess I should have done in the first place):

"You re-added "will consist of eight episodes. The Duffer Brothers have said that Stranger Things is likely to end after its fourth or fifth season." We are not supposed to put anything in the lead about the WP:FUTURE unless it's "almost certain to take place". We could say "eight episodes are planned". And it's fine to include what the Duffers have mentioned about future plans in the article, but we can't have it in the lead unless it's an "official announcement". Also, you added a fifth paragraph, which goes against e: Article length that's more than 30,000 characters should be 3 or 4 paragraphs in the lead.

As for the removal of the "refimprove section" templates [cast list], I thought that all entries should have a ref. for verification – especially guest stars." -Thanks --Musdan77 (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

There's a difference between us editors speculating on the future we can't predicted, and a source statement by people intimately tied with a production saying what they'd like to see. The Duffers opining they want 4 or 5 seasons is fine for us to repeat as long as we can source it (we can). We can't say that without identifying the Duffers as those speaking it. --Masem (t) 01:01, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

What Masem said. We're not debating on what the future holds. We are summarizing what the article states, from reliable sources, which are statements from the Duffer Brothers. That's probably as official as you can get - direct from the showrunners. What isn't allowed is saying "We (the editors) expect the series to end after four or five seasons, given past patterns". Also, MOS:LEADLENGTH is a guideline, and the table given is preceded by text stating "As a general guideline—but not absolute rule", "following suggestions" and "may be useful". It's not a solid requirement. For the guest stars, yes, direct sources can be added to the article for them, and that may be preferred, but their inclusion is already acceptable as they are sourced by the episodes acting as the WP:PRIMARY source. -- Alex^TW 09:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Okay. I still don't think that that type of thing needs to be in the lead. It just makes it unnecessarily long(er). --Musdan77 (talk) 22:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I do think that the rest of the lead could certainly do with a trim. Perhaps then it could be merged back into the suggested four paragraphs. -- Alex^TW 22:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Episodes

Starting a discussion here for Nauriya after their WP:BOLD split. -- Alex^TW 13:22, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, the only reason I created the separate article was the main one is already too informative and lengthy plus the awards section is way too long to be inducted in same page. Two of mine major edits for this article have been reverted and I reserved back and thought may be its not the right time. But the article should be shorten and reasonable section be separated into articles. Nauriya - Let's talk 16:27, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree that the awards should be split soon, as it is now a great deal longer, which will dramatically reduce the article's length. However, there's only been 2 seasons and 17 episodes; such a minimal number does not require a split for the episodes. -- Alex^TW 13:34, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Currently the article is very extensive. If there are already two seasons and soon a third season, I agree to create a separate page for the episodes. --Miaow 16:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

I'm with Alex, there's not enough episodes to split yet. Split the awards first, and if after the third season the page is still cluttered we can revisit the idea.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 18:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Agreed. Two seasons of a Fall series is not two seasons of Stranger Things, there's only just over a dozen episodes. The episodes split was 25k characters; there's 50k just in the accolades table. Why go for the smaller split? -- Alex^TW 00:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes, if anything should be split, it's the awards table (which is a horrific mess anyway). —Joeyconnick (talk) 01:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Working on that already! Nauriya - Let's talk 20:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

I agree that the accolades should be split first and then the characters before we split the episodes. I've improved the current draft for the accolades so it should be ready to be moved very soon. Just need to improve the lead and add a few missing awards. - Brojam (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Ok then I will remove mine, as I had created it too. Nauriya - Let's talk 16:00, 01 June 2018 (UTC)

On the "summer of" / "mid-"1985 part

I know MOS:SEASON warns of the use of seasonal terms as applied to events because its usually not clear if that season is to be taken as northern v southern hemisphere, losing precision. However, MOS:SEASON does have room to use season names when the location is clear; and here, we've established that Hawkins is in the United States, so "summer of 1985" is precise. We'd have the problem if we were saying "Season 3 is expected to air summer of 2019", since we don't have a location for that airing and leading to the imprecision.

I'm just pointing out that there's room for things like this in the MOS, its not an absolutely that you can't use season names. --Masem (t) 16:07, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Lead Section re-write

The lead section is cluttered and exceeding "four-paragraphs rule" and is not well-composed. See: MOS:LEAD and WP:LEAD, Nauriya - Let's talk 15:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

The "four-paragraphs rule" isn't a rule, it's a suggestion. WP:BEBOLD and fix it. -- Alex^TW 14:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Cast list

The cast and characters list is very excessive and potentially overwhelming for readers, and it is certainly not mobile user friendly. I myself dont visit this article very often and just looking at it makes the article seem very messy and incohesive. I feel like this is something that should be discussed so it can be rectified. Brocicle (talk) 19:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

How would you propose changing it? Usually casts are sorted by billing order.--QueerFilmNerd (talk) 19:12, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

See Talk:Stranger_Things/Archive_2#Page_for_characters?, #Article splitting, and Draft:List of Stranger Things characters. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:13, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

@Favre1fan93: Are we waiting for anything to move the draft? - Brojam (talk) 20:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

I don't believe so. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Alright, I'll add some sources for the recurring cast members and then move it. - Brojam (talk) 18:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Fine by me, and then the recurring and guest lists can be removed. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@QueerFilmNerd:Sorry I should have been more specific and said the recurring and guest cast lists. Brocicle (talk) 19:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Quick note related to today's teaser

Some people I see are taking the "coming next summer" on the fictional ad for STarcourt as meaning S3 is next summer, but I do not believe we can say the TV show is due back due to that. We know s3 is aimed to take place during the summer of 1985 and for all purposes that's all the fake ad is saying. Until Duffers or Netflix say otherwise, let's not assume a Summer 2019 broadcast date due to that fake ad. --Masem (t) 16:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Stranger Things (season 1)

Hello everyone! I don't know, but for some reason season 1 of Stranger Things is still in draft status despite having a large amount of content. A little while ago I moved the draft for the first season of ST into the mainspace. Then, my edits got reverted. The draft deserves to be moved, it has a lot of useful information that deserves to have a use. Please take a look at the draft and don't hesitate in letting me know what you think about it. Thanks. The Optimistic One (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Probably because of the history here and resultant protection. -- Alex^TW 14:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

I see that I'm not the only person you reverted on that page. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Do you agree with me in saying that draft deserves to be moved to the mainspace? The Optimistic One (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

No, you weren't, and no, I'm not. Nor am I saying it shouldn't. -- Alex^TW 15:08, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2018

Since stranger Things is on it's third season soon, there have been some new cast members, I would like to add them in. MikeUncle1 (talk) 03:10, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

 Not done We need reliable sources to confirm new cast members, which I have just checked and not seen any news of. --Masem (t) 04:06, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I think that this page does a great job of analyzing the plot of Stranger Things as well as the production, but there are various amounts of information that only somewhat connected to the television show such as the video game section Kc100kc (talk) 06:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

What does this have to do with the above request? -- Alex^TW 04:33, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

I work on Season 3 and just added info on new cast changes/additions. Do not remove them as they are accurate. Mjbmaster (talk) 06:33, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Any changes you make must be supported by reliable, third party, independent sources. Unsourced and uncited changes will be reverted. Scr★pIron^IV 12:50, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Fix the sexist character description please?

Looking through the cast & characters section, the description of Nancy Wheeler is seriously laughable and needs fixing. "daughter of Karen and Ted and older sister of Mike. In season one, she is Steve Harrington's girlfriend. In season two, she becomes Jonathan Byers' girlfriend." the whole character is whittled down to her role in relation to her family and two boys. Compare it to the other characters descriptions, for example Jonathan right below her "the older brother of Will Byers and the son of Joyce Byers. He is a quiet teenager, an outsider at school, and an aspiring photographer. He is close with his mother and brother, and he becomes the boyfriend of Nancy Wheeler." in this short description we get the relevant connections he has to other characters and some personal info describing who HE is, why nothing describing Nancy like that? Think the descriptions could use a general look into (for example on Steve it says he befriends Jonathan but has he really? More like called a truce at most. Also how relevant is it?) but especially Nancy's, it's laughably sexist. --109.228.174.54 (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

WP:BEBOLD and fix it yourself. -- Alex^TW 01:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

IP can't edit this page, the page is protected from May 2018 until May 2019. --Hddty. (talk) 06:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Hddty., a month late, but thanks. -- Alex^TW 14:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Individual Article for Pilot

Would it make any sense to make an individual article for the series pilot, since that started it all? Hummerrocket (talk) 00:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

No, given that with Netflix series, it was all broadcast as once, no individual episode of a season has separate notability from the other eps. This is not to say that each ep could have its own article, but I think it's better to make a per-season article. --Masem (t) 00:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Speeding Up the Addition of the Drafts to the Mainspace

Hey everyone! So, we all know that articles exist for the individual seasons as drafts. I think with the beginning of the ad campaign for season three, I think the first and second season pages should be fleshed out and moved into the mainspace. Once the release date for the third season is announced within the next two weeks, the third season can be moved over as well. I;m going to do what I can, but does anyone agree/want to help out? Thank you! SomethingToTellYou (talk) 15:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Season 3 Article

I believe my draft article for season 3, Draft:Stranger Things (season 3), is ready for addition to the mainspace. I included a large amount of information not included in the main article. Can you guys take a look and see if you would agree? Thank you! SomethingToTellYou (talk) 17:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your work! Drafts should, however, look more like Draft:Stranger Things (season 1) or Arrow (season 1) before they become articles. Perhaps it's best to focus on the articles of the seasons that have already been released, given that Season 3 still has half a year until we see it. -- /Alex/₂₁ 19:29, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

The season 3 draft doesn't look that bad though. I think with a touch more polish on all three season drafts, and then maybe figuring out what this article will look like post split, they'd be good to go and I would support them. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

I definitely plan on polishing the season three article up this weekend, and maybe perhaps adding some more filming information to flesh out the page. Should we start a discussion about the splitting of the page? I feel as if they're close to being able to be moved as well. SomethingToTellYou (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Season 1 and 3 are the closest, the season 2 need the most attention to justify a split at this time I feel. But yeah, we can start seeing what a split will look like. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I'll create a new section for this discussion. SomethingToTellYou (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Splitting the Stranger Things Article

Hello all. This section is for the discussion of the splitting of the Stranger Things page, specifically the removal of certain elements and details and conferring them to the separate season pages. How do you all propose we decide which information gets designated for the separate season pages? SomethingToTellYou (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Looking at other articles, the list of episodes is what would be spun out first. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

This is more specifically about season pages, which splitting to those, negates the need for an LoE, because the episode tables will just be transcluded back here without the plot. For content, essentially, if it is wholly season-specific, it should go to the season articles. So that's going to be a good chunk of the production info (with general overview info remaining here as needed), release and home media, all of the reception. Other media will stay here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:28, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

I fleshed out the draft for the second season quite a bit tonight. I believe it's just about ready for the mainspace, with the exception of the sparse accolades sections and a couple of character descriptions. SomethingToTellYou (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)