Talk:St Mary's Church, Mablethorpe
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cielquiparle in topic Did you know nomination
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A fact from St Mary's Church, Mablethorpe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 14th-century St Mary's Church, Mablethorpe in Lincolnshire, England, is constructed of material classified as random mixed rubble, red brick and slate? Source: Parish church. c.1300, C13, 1714, C19, extensively rebuilt 1976-80 by G.R.A. Mack of Louth. Random mixed rubble, red brick, slate roofs.
Created by DragonofBatley (talk) and Bruxton (talk). Nominated by Bruxton (talk) at 00:54, 21 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/St Mary's Church, Mablethorpe; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Hi Bruxton (talk), review follows: article created 20 February and exceeds minimum length; article is well written; I didn't pick up on any overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook is interesting enough and the building material checks out to the source cited; couple of queries, if the land for the church was given in 1300 then it is 14th century, not 13th century. Is there a reason you've cited BritishListedBuildings? It looks like it just copies the Historic England list entry, so I think you're better off citing that (no ads, more reliable etc.) - Dumelow (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2023 (UTC)