Talk:Southease railway station

Alleged Neutrality Dispute

What's the nature of the problem? Autarch 21:40, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Nothing posted ... hence the dispute tags have been removed. No crime reported, and no body found. Miner2049er 21:07, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Passenger & freight quantities

This seems like a tiny station a long way from significant-sized population centres. I'm curious as to how it survived Beeching and later rationalisations. Perhaps the nearby refuse site was once an important factory? Or perhaps the proximity of the South Downs Way is the justification... Does anyone have information on any noteworthy history about the station's survival? Would be good to see a bit of background included in the article. – Kieran T ^(talk) 21:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The South Downs Way sounds like a fair bet - it crosses the railway at the station, and in both directions there are some 150 m+ hills only a very short distance away. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:08, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Southease railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://southeasevillage.info/Parish%20Newsletter%20October%202006%20pdf.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)