Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex

WikiProject Sussex
Flag of Sussex.svg
Flag of Sussex
ShortcutWP:Sussex
CategoryWikiProject Sussex
Portals East Sussex
 West Sussex
Wikimedia CommonsCommons:Category:Sussex Sussex
Project banner template{{WikiProject Sussex}}
Userbox{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Membership}}
AssessmentWikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Assessment
Popular pagesWikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Popular pages


Welcome to the WikiProject Sussex. This project draws together editors working on all Sussex-related articles, with the aim of improving and expanding all aspects of coverage. There are many articles to deal with, from local newspapers to notable local football teams. Please join us to help these articles become amongst the best on Wikipedia.

Please note, there is a separate project for Brighton and Hove.

Article AlertsEdit

The following Sussex articles are currently being listed in Wikipedia workflows. Click here for information.

Today's featured articles

Featured article candidates

Requesting an assessmentEdit

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it please click here.


  • I am not a member of this project and do not wish to be, but would ask that the article Wealden iron industry be reassessed and rerated following its recent revision. Peterkingiron 14:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
Done MortimerCat (talk) 21:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Ashurst Wood - I've done a lot of editing to this article and it's currently rated as a stub. It definitely needs reassessing and as I've made a large set of changes it would be more appropriate if somebody else assessed it. Thanks ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 00:32, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Done MortimerCat (talk) 23:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Kingston near Lewes has been assessed on the UK Geography Wikiproject, but not Wikiproject Sussex. Would it be a good candidate? Autarch (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Kingston was subsequently added. MortimerCat (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Hollingbury has been expanded and images added since it was last rated as a stub. Please could you reassess. Hzv5wk (talk) 21:02, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Hassocks is currently unassessed and having a particular interest in the village I would be grateful if someone could have a look at it for me. Many thanks. Paste (talk) 08:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
  • Burgess Hill has not been rated in a fairly long time and it would seem that most of the things of the to do list have been done, if not fully to a notably greater extent. Please could you reassess. Curtis31992 (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Cowdray House I've just put a significant amount of history into this article, I don't think it is still a stub, as such would be grateful for someone to re-assess it. I've removed the stub assessment so it's currently unassessed. JonEastham (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Could Littlehampton Redoubt and Shoreham Redoubt please be reassessed? I have added headings, text, images, references and a bibliography to both pages. Are they still stubs? Thank you. Kinnerton (talk) 20:31, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Done.--Charles (talk) 23:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I think almost certainly.--Charles (talk) 21:59, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Just came across this, Sussex is rated as start class with a notice saying that it lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations, yet has 137 inline citations and has multiple, detailed sections. Could this be reassessed? Thanks.  Seagull123  Φ  19:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Could someone look at Fulking - I think it's moved beyond a stub, and is now perhaps a 'B'. Topo122 (talk) 16:53, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
  • History of Sussex is currently listed as C-class, but I feel like it should be much higher than that - what do others think?  Seagull123  Φ  19:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Done.----Dorkinglad (talk) 19:17, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

For further details please go to our assessment page.

StatisticsEdit

  • 3.4% List-Class
  • 37.3% Stub-Class
  • 42% Start-Class
  • 9.7% C-Class
  • 5.5% B-Class
  • 0.9% GA-Class
  • 0.7% FA-Class
  • 0.5% remaining
  • Quality operations: A bot-generated daily log which lists articles Reassessed, Assessed and Removed.
  • Popular pages: List of top articles with the most frequent views, updated monthly.


TemplatesEdit

Talk pagesEdit

Use the {{WikiProject Sussex}} template on talk pages of articles which are related to Sussex. Use the code: {{WikiProject Sussex|class=Stub|importance=low|unref=yes}} to produce:

WikiProject Sussex (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
 This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations

(the |class= parameter can also be set to Start or C). This project can only rate an article Stub, Start or C. Higher grades involve external input such as peer reviews.

  • Stub - An article with a single line or paragraph.
  • Start - An article that has grown beyond the single paragraph, and has started to be split into sections.
  • C - An article that appears to finished growing. There are no obvious gaps in information, and there are plenty of citations.

When creating a new banner, the importance will probably be low (possibly mid), on the assumption that all important articles will have already been included. The unref=yes should be removed if there a are no referencing issues in the article.

If the article is already associated with another project, multiple projects may be listed using the {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} template.

UserboxEdit

To show that you are a member of the Sussex WikiProject, put the following code on your user page: {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Membership}} this transcludes the userbox at {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Sussex/Membership}} and will produce:

 This user is a member of WikiProject Sussex.



InviteEdit

To invite someone to join the Sussex WikiProject, put the following code on someone's talk page: {{subst:WP Sussex invite}} Add this template, {{WP Sussex invite}}, to the user page of someone who has shown interest in editing Sussex related articles to invite them to this WikiProject. This shows:

  Hello WikiProject Sussex! You are invited to join WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to the county of Sussex in South East England. Come and join us! ~~~~

Remember to always subst: this template.

MembersEdit

  1. Vox Humana 8' (founder)
  2. Itsmejudith
  3. Hassocks5489
  4. A bit iffy
  5. Paste
  6. Charlesdrakew
  7. Peter Shearan
  8. MortimerCat
  9. Autarch
  10. FM (Freakmighty)
  11. Lordmwa
  12. Seafordrulez
  13. JeffreyTBest
  14. Thatmotorwayguy specialising in the Southern areas of Sussex, contributing to the roads aspect of Sussex, specialising in the A22 and A27
  15. Kinnerton
  16. Doug (at Wiki)
  17. Seagull123
  18. BoroFan89
  19. Wilfridselsey
  20. Pachyderm16
  21. Tony Holkham - West Sussex particularly
  22. EddersGTI - Sussex County Football League and Eastbourne Town F.C. plus other little bits
  23. Polegåarden - covering woodlands in North Horsham
  24. dorkinglad

CategoriesEdit

Category:WikiProject Sussex articles

Main category: Sussex

Our best workEdit

Our Featured ArticlesEdit

Our Good ArticlesEdit

Useful external linksEdit