Talk:Sarah Harding
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarah Harding article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A news item involving Sarah Harding was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 September 2021. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Photo
editcan someone find a slightly less shocking phot of her? that current one does her no favours at all, looks like she's getting rid of something after a night on the hot sauce.--81.132.75.6 (talk) 23:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Vertical clitoral hood piercing
edit- "Sarah, a fan of body piercing, had a Vertical Clitoral Hood piercing performed by Ian Stafford in a Stockport piercing studio."
I removed this from the article in line with policy on unreferenced information like this. Although I don't object to its inclusion, its slightly questionable and salacious nature means it's best kept out of the article unless it can be referenced. Driller thriller 03:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Her most recent fling
editThere seems to be an edit "debate" regarding a line suggesting "Her most recent fling". Two footballers names and their appropiate clubs are being edited in/out interchangeably depending on the users doing the edit.
For now I've removed the entire line on the basis of Wikipedia:Verifiability and in particular Biographies of living persons#Remove unsourced or poorly sourced controversial material
If either group of people can find citation from a reliable source (see WP:RS), then the information can go back in as long as the appropiate reference is added to verify it.
For now, until some sort of citation is given the sentence should remain out. After all, information changing back and forth multiple times a day isn't really ideal is it? GQsm 17:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
External links
edithttp://sarahhardingpictures.blogspot.com/ I saw some videos on this blog can i add this one to the ext. links page. Yes or No —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolierasic (talk • contribs) 20:47, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
"Harding once blagged a first-class flight to Dubai with good friend Danielle Lloyd"
editHarding once blagged a first-class flight to Dubai with good friend Danielle Lloyd.[3] They later fell out when Lloyd became more serious with her boyfriend Teddy Sherringham. Harding stated this in an interview with OK! magazine saying that she and Lloyd "drifted apart."
What does the word "blagged" mean in this sentence?
Urbandictionary had a link: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=blagged I think it's UK slang, but I'm not from the UK and not grokking the meaning.
Obviously slang does not belong on wikipedia, and should be removed with proper language immediately —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.224.162.145 (talk) 17:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- "Blagged" is indeed UK slang. The Oxford English Dictionary has a definition: http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/blag?view=uk
- In this context, it's the second: to "obtain by clever talk or lying". Chicanery, trickery - that sort of thing. She was booked on an economy class flight and got herself and Danielle an upgrade thanks to the "blag". A simple example might be that they pointed out they were both famous [sic] and promised they'd say something nice about the airline in their next interviews. --Zoid9969 (talk) 17:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)zoid9969
- Im from the UK and have never heard the word 'blagged' ever. Maxtitan (talk) 20:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- In that context the meaning carried by 'blagged' would simply be 'obtained free'(i.e. didn't need to pay for). It is a well established UK term with accurate, clear and long standing meanings. However it is unquestionably of a slang style despite being well established. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.65.48.231 (talk) 04:13, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sarah Harding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071227152324/http://www.girlsaloud.org:80/info.php?go=sarah to http://www.girlsaloud.org/info.php?go=sarah
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090817120451/http://www.theinsider.com:80/news/489272_Cheryl_Cole_Attending_Kimberley_Walsh_26th_Brithday_Party to http://www.theinsider.com/news/489272_Cheryl_Cole_Attending_Kimberley_Walsh_26th_Brithday_Party
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:15, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Sarah Harding. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120731195305/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/lifestyle/health_and_beauty/health_and_beauty_reviews/s/212/212404_girls_alouds_sarah_confesses_all.html to http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/lifestyle/health_and_beauty/health_and_beauty_reviews/s/212/212404_girls_alouds_sarah_confesses_all.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:19, 28 February 2016 (UTC)