Talk:Robop

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Categorisation

edit

This is definitely an odd article. I don't know if it's worthy of being on Wikipedia or whether I categorized it the best way. Please help if you'd like. Egpetersen 20:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it's indeed quite odd. But the product seems to have generated a lot of press coverage, so there are certainly enough sources to expand the article. (Not sure whether someone will actually expand the article, but it does fulfill the notability criteria.) --B. Wolterding 18:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Robop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:35, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply