Talk:Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Another Believer in topic New source
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 14, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
There is a request, submitted by --Another Believer (Talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "Good article on English Wikipedia". |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Building's historic status edit
@Ipoellet: I was wondering if you had a moment to check my summary of the building's historic status, based on this source (site #16)? Without being too detailed because I'm not exactly sure how to separate the business from the building, I'm hoping my text at least explains how the restaurant has some architectural significance. Does you have any suggestions or proposed changes? ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: I rewrote the first sentence in the "Building" section to more fully spell out what the building's "non-contributing" status means, since "non-contributing" is NRHP jargon. The definition is included in the NRHP document you referenced, so I don't think any additional citation is needed. Feel free to clean up further.
- Please pardon my long delay in replying. I've been on an extended wikibreak and this is my first time looking at my messages in about 6 months. — Ipoellet (talk) 03:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ipoellet, No problem at all. Please feel free to improve the article's text as you see fit. Welcome back! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
New source edit
---Another Believer (Talk) 21:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)