Talk:Nancy Rothwell

Latest comment: 3 years ago by StephenJPC in topic Apology claim

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nancy Rothwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Apology claim edit

Not quite sure how to add this to the article, but Nancy Rothwell's claim on Newsnight that she had written to the black student who had been racially profiled to apologise was not true, and that she has now written to the student to apologise for making that false claim. Guardian article: [1] YouTube video: [2] StephenJPC (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

@StephenJPC:   Done, though you're right that it's difficult to summarise without sounding too muddled, so feel free to revise what I've added. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Arms & Hearts: Thanks, that's really clear, no need to revise at all.

StephenJPC (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

References