Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physiology

Add topic
Active discussions

WikiProject Physiology (Rated Project-class)
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Project This page does not require a rating on the quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This page has not yet been associated with a particular area.

Merge Complete glucose breakdown into GlycolysisEdit

Hello, I'm littleb2009.

I have proposed a merge between Complete glucose breakdown and Glycolysis. However, I am aware that Complete glucose breakdown is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, so I wanted to bring the merge to this talk page.

Please discuss at Talk:Glycolysis#Merger proposal. I will not do the merge until more people comment for it than against it.

--littleb2009 (talk page) 20:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the notification. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Hoffmann's reflex: video neededEdit

Can we get a video of a Hoffmann's reflex test? The description on the article is not easy to follow. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Macfarlane Burnet Featured article reviewEdit

I have nominated Macfarlane Burnet for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sourcesEdit

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[ Article of things]" ''''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)