Talk:Luke Pomersbach
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
editI propose that 2012 Luke Pomersbach molesting charges be merged into Luke Pomersbach. I think that the content in the 2012 Luke Pomersbach molesting charges article can easily be explained in the context of Luke Pomersbach, and the Luke Pomersbach article is of a reasonable size that the merging of 2012 Luke Pomersbach molesting charges will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. As the charges were dropped, it is unlikely that the charges article can be expanded. Hack (talk) 17:03, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- and I propose that it is deleted altogether. The case is adequately covered already on Pomerabach's page and as a courtcase it is very unnotable and routine. Any search will find the players page so it is unnecessary to leave a redirect. The-Pope (talk) 00:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Agree with The-Pope. My advice would be to PROD the article. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- I second it. Either it should be merged or deleted. TheSpecialUser TSU 01:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Luke Pomersbach. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517232737/http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,23281911-23212,00.html to http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,23281911-23212,00.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://cricket.com.au/news-display/25081
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)