Talk:Kaoru Kobayashi (murderer)

References

This article needs several references to back up the information in it. Since it's apparently a big case, it should be no problem finding them. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 06:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Executed or Not?

this is not clear in the article if he was executed or not. would someone please include that in the first paragraph. 202.142.190.245 (talk) 13:15, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

He was sentenced to death, and indeed requested and desired the sentence, but has not been executed yet.74.227.63.107 (talk) 09:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Rename?

Should this article be moved to a more intuitive name? At the very least, maybe the victim's and convicted's names should probably redirect here. Neier 11:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

I thought the same thing - the article is about the killer, not the victim. Alvis (talk) 05:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

Murder of Kaede Ariyama → Kaoru Kobayashi — The article is written about not the victim but the killer. —ACSE (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

• Support - as the article is primarily about the killer, Kaoru Kobayashi. --DAJF (talk) 12:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

Any additional comments:

Blatant Misrepresntation

Who in the WORLD added the section of this sentence in parentheses?

"Several Japanese mass media suspected that the crime was committed by a Figure moe zoku (a stereotypical recluse who dreams of committing sex crimes)."

This is incredibly untrue. Someone with a huge bias must have added the last part. I'm fixing it now. God, the article for "figure moe zoku" even defines them, and NOT as sick freaks that dream about rape. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.147.228.234 (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Deleted?

I don't know who put this up for deletion, but I don't see any real reason for it. It does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, IMO. It just needs a bit of a re-write by someone who knows the case. KaylaraOwl (talk) 16:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)KaylaraOwl

Otaku

Devoting entire two paragraphs to this whole Otaku controversy is ridiculous, and I've seen it repeated again and again in various articles about Japanese murderers. Clearly someone feels an urgent need to defend that subculture by preventively stating that this or that murderer was not Otaku in every article and talking about how the poor otaku have a hard time with the public. Look, nobody cares. The way those paragraphs are written suggests the author is probably non-native English speaker (I dare guess Japanese) and most likely an Otaku him/herself, since they don't even bother briefly explaining/providing an English equivalent for the term. This is an article about a brutal murder of a child, nobody cares about the ~stigma~ surrounding your hobbies. If the media/public keep associating you with psychos then maybe it's time for self-reflection and not fishing for sympathy. Maybe it's time to "collect your people", so to speak. You're not being victimised here. It's really sad that people - children mostly - have died and yet you feel the need to rush to the defence of your pastime which is completely irrelevant to anyone outside of Japan. In this article it is out of place and it's sickening. It's bad that you guys are stigmatised but uh, murder. Kind of a heavier case don't you think? We have a section named "effect on Otaku" here, but we don't have one for effect on the community or effect on the family, as in the people actually affected by the case. I find the inclusion of the Otaku controversy distasteful and unnecessary (in this and similar articles).--109.196.118.133 (talk) 20:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

name

The WP article should be on the Murder of Kaede Ariyama, a story which got huge media coverage in Japan at the time it happened, which currently redirects to here. I guess because the murderer served capital punishment, it entitles him to a WP bio, as WP convention goes, but I don't think that's right. One-off murderers should not be considered WP notable. Mayumashu (talk) 07:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Add link

Page about Kaoru 83.220.237.89 (talk) 05:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kaoru Kobayashi (murderer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081010160956/http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/trial/080425/trl0804252207012-n1.htm to http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/trial/080425/trl0804252207012-n1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:05, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Kaoru Kobayashi (murderer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.japantoday.com/jp/shukan/256
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114163221/http://www.47news.jp/CN/200502/CN2005022801002348.html to http://www.47news.jp/CN/200502/CN2005022801002348.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713085830/http://www.japanaddicted.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=9 to http://www.japanaddicted.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=9
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130902044513/http://picnic.to/~ami/ool.htm to http://picnic.to/~ami/ool.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090112001540/http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20061011a2.html to http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20061011a2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114163241/http://www.47news.jp/CN/200804/CN2008042501001109.html to http://www.47news.jp/CN/200804/CN2008042501001109.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114163311/http://www.47news.jp/CN/200807/CN2008070901000602.html to http://www.47news.jp/CN/200807/CN2008070901000602.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)