Talk:John S. McCain Sr.

(Redirected from Talk:John S. McCain, Sr.)
Latest comment: 2 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Serious need of improvement

edit

McCain was a major figure in World War II and deserves a much fuller article than this in its present form, which seems to be mostly genealogy of only marginal relevance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.231.245.243 (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

The book "Halsey's Storm" has a good deal about "Stew" McCain and would be a good place to start with fixing this bio. He was a very important figure in WWII and you would have no idea about this from reading this bio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.194.213.146 (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

There isn't very much about McCain on the web. So, someone is going to have to crack open a book or two in order to improve this article significantly. Whoever does it, please make sure to inline cite the source. Cla68 (talk) 00:03, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

No cites for the posthumous award of a combat action ribbon. The CAR is retroactive to 07 Dec 41, eligibility is limited to Captain (O6) and below. McCain made RADM (O7) in Jan 1941 making him ineligible for the CAR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.197.21.160 (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Multiple edits on January 14, 2008

edit

Sorry for making so many edits to this article today. It took me that many tries to get it right; sometimes I forget to preview before saving. Anyway, no mischief afoot. Yellow-bellied sapsucker (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Descent from Robert the Bruce?

edit

This statement is factually incorrect "His grandson John S. McCain III claims royal descent on his campaign website". The article clearly states that McCain’s family roots in Europe are Scotch-Irish. His great-aunt was a descendant of Robert the Bruce, an early Scottish king. Well It is a clear fact that no one is the direct descendant of their "great aunt" (notwithstanding incestuous relationships). It is also clear that if this aunt were the sister of one of McCain's direct ancestors, say his great-grandfather or great-grandmother, then we would say that his direct ancestor claimed descent from Robert the Bruce. The fact that it is only his great-aunt that claims this descent implies that he is related to Robert the Bruce by marriage, and is therefore not a direct descendant. I'm going to amend the text. Alun (talk) 08:04, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cause of Death

edit

What exactly was McCain's cause of death? Jaedglass (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

McCain, JO

edit

"McCain took part in the Great White Fleet's world cruise". Just to be clear, I deleted refs Nimitz et al 'cause there's no causal relationship between the GWF cruise & rising to flag rank, & "many JOs" as flaming obvious, unless you think the ships were crewed entirely by ABs. It would, however, be of value to mention what ship McCain served in during the cruise.... Also, tho I don't think there's an article yet, I'd distinguish "aviator" from "naval aviator"... TREKphiler hit me ♠ 19:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

His father's name

edit

Are we sure his father's name was John S. Mccain? Would he still be called J.S.M Senior in this case? and his grandson JSM III? --Valleyofdawn (talk) 14:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this is a known oddity of the McCain family history. They didn't start the "chaining" until after one generation with the same name. Wasted Time R (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on John S. McCain Sr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cover-up of Isaeli Attack on US Warship "Liberty"

edit

No mention is made of his role in the cover-up.66.25.171.16 (talk) 05:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Likely because no reliable sources exist to support that statement. If you have some, please present them. clpo13(talk) 23:36, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
Actually, it's probably because that event, the USS Liberty incident, occurred 22 years after he died. He died in 1945, the Liberty incident was in 1967. 73.194.85.220 (talk) 21:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John S. McCain Sr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:John S. McCain Sr./GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 23:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll get to this shortly--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Sturmvogel 66: You reckon? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:20, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
For varying definitions of shortly

--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 11:13, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
John S. McCain and his son John S. McCain Jr. in September 1945. Admiral McCain died a few days after this photo was taken.
Improved to Good Article status by Hawkeye7 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 428 past nominations.

Hawkeye7 (discuss) 20:55, 18 July 2024 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   All looks good to me. Rarely see an Earwig report at 0.0%—wow! Bsoyka (tcg) 03:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply