Talk:Isabella Correa

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Bruxton in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 21:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Created by Ploni (talk). Self-nominated at 17:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Isabella Correa; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  • Review:
    • New enough article
    • Long enough (DYK check isn't working for me right now, but wordcounter.net indicates around 1,800 characters)
    • "Violation Unlikely" at Earwig (9.1%)
    • Article is presentable
    • Both hooks are cited by reliable sources. I do not understand the language, but Google Translate seems to verify the hooks.
    • Original hook is more interesting, because it does not require too much reader knowledge. ALT1 works, however.
    • Only image used is certainly in the public domain
    • QPQ has been done
    • No other issues
  • Congrats, passed   Bremps... 01:36, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Bremps and Ploni: Just over 1500 characters (1532), I was verifying the citations and after sources are translated, several areas are borderline WP:CLOP. Be careful to interpret sources and avoid close paraphrasing. Bruxton (talk) 21:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply