Talk:Hazel Mae
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hazel Mae article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Hazel Mae. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Hazel Mae at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled edit
"The face" of MLB Network
Why does this entry — twice — call Mae "the face" of the MLB Network? By my count, there are at least 18 on-air talents, including five studio hosts (whereas Mae is one of two reporters).
Also, why is this entry locked from changes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.196.151.154 (talk) 00:29, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Hazel Mae either "is the former" or "was". She "was" not "the former." That's redundant and she is not dead yet so it doesn't make any sense. Correct that grammatical nightmare. 134.88.167.182 (talk) 00:28, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Edit request from , 3 November 2011 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
It has just been announced that Hazel Mae is returning to Rogers Sportsnet in Toronto as their Prime Time anchor at 6:00 on Sportsnet Connected.
Hazel Mae returns to Sportsnet
HyperDriver (talk) 00:00, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Has been added to the article. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 00:14, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Edit request on 6 April 2013 edit
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a Toronto, Ontario, CA High School yearbook photo of current Toronto Blue Jays reporter Hazel Mae, on http://www.hazelmae.net/hazel_mae_pictures/Hazel_Mae_In_Toronto/image37.htm. It states her name to be "Hazel Cagulada". One quick look at it, and you can clearly see it is, in fact, Ms. Mae. Also, the bio page for Hazel on http://www.fanpix.net/gallery/hazel-mae-pictures.htm, lists her full name as "Hazel Mae Cagulada". All the other details for her bio here exactly match those currently shown on Wikipedia. I am simply trying to bring her "actual, birth last name" to the attention of someone more Wiki experienced, to see if they believe my two sources here (granted, not exactly "Encyclopedia Brittanica") have enough credibility, in your opinion, to warrant an update to her page. Many thanks! 69.37.235.107 (talk) 11:36, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: The first link you provided is dead and the second is a fansite with what appears to be user-generated content and therefore not a reliable source. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)