Talk:Guangming Daily
 | A fact from Guangming Daily appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 13 July 2017 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved - WP:SNOW decision. — Amakuru (talk) 14:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
Guangming Daily (China) → Guangming Daily – per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and WP:TWODABS:
1. Circulation. The Chinese paper is one of the country's most important national papers, once one of China's "big three", with a circulation of 1.5 million in 1987. Its most recent circulation is 490,000, comparable to 571,500 for The New York Times. I don't have the data for the Malaysian paper, but its target audience is the ethnic Chinese population in Malaysia, which numbers about 10 million, less than 1% of China's population.
2. Web traffic. Alexa ranks the Chinese paper's website (gmw.cn) as the 73rd busiest in the world, and 14th busiest in China [1]. The Malaysia newspaper's website ranks 78,776th in the world, and 586th in Malaysai [2].
3. Long-term significance. The Chinese paper has been extremely important in Chinese politics, heavily involved in the ending of the Cultural Revolution and the victory of Deng Xiaoping over Hua Guofeng. Its articles are intensely studied by scholars. For example, it is cited many times in The Cambridge History of China. I don't see any comparable influence from the Malaysian paper.
-Zanhe (talk) 02:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - I have placed notices for this RM at Talk:Guang Ming Daily (Malaysia), WT:CHINA, WT:MALAYSIA and WT:JOURNALISM. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 08:56, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom, which makes a convincing case. No such user (talk) 10:09, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support - The "China" bit in the title is unnecessary for the well-known Chinese newspaper. STSC (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support per nom. No DAB page needed per WP:TWODABS. — AjaxSmack 01:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support – Clear primary topic. Hatnote will lead to the Malaysian newspaper. — JFG talk 10:06, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- Support, per nom --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:21, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
