This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Douglas Kertland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Douglas Kertland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070318233416/http://www.databaseolympics.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=KERTLDOU01 to http://www.databaseolympics.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=KERTLDOU01
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
explanation
editI reverted this edit by 129.100.255.30.
I am checking all the edits from that IP address because of a vandal has been using it, and 129.100.255.31 to make disruptive edits.
The individual making these disruptive edits was vastly overconfident, and did not really master our policies, such as the need for valid references, prior to earning an indefinite block. This particular edit is unreferenced, and looks like the kind of editorializing that vandal routinely made. Geo Swan (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2019 (UTC)