Talk:Cyclone Giri

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cthomau5 in topic Very or Extremely?
Good articleCyclone Giri has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 30, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Info Box edit

everything in the info box is wrong...15jan19932010 (talk) 11:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dont worry, we are updating it time to time and i will see that all information is correct by the time the system makes landfall. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 12:52, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Actually the infobox is fully correct.Jason Rees (talk) 13:06, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Sorry 15jan19932010, when I created the page, everything was in a confusion as the information was not updated in the main season page and the storm was going through rapid intensification. Sorry if any inconvenience was caused. Thanks to Anirudh Emani.Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 16:16, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I dont need thanks, i was just updating it time to time. Anirudh EmaniSay something 09:09, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hope edit

I just hope that the storm does not cause heavy damage. Cyclone Nargis hit the same region 2 years ago and was devastating. PI just hope that they are strong enough to tackle this storm, as this appears to be stronger than Nargis. Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 16:22, 22 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I got mixed up with the season live information and the maximum storm strength at its peak. Why is the 1 min winds set at 180mph. I put it back to 155mph after realising that this was the individual storm page but it says 180mph winds.

Yeah, it is possible that the system may not cause that much devastation as compared to Nargis. Nargis made landfall further south in the low lying areas of Irrawaddy. Giri is making landfall to the north where the land is high enough to take the rainwater and storm surge. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 04:30, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Storm Path edit

Storm path on the map is different from satellite image of IMD. http://www.imd.gov.in/section/satmet/dynamic/insatnequad-vis.htm Yarzaryeni (talk) 05:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dont worry, our members will update it soon. However, the JTWC path is used, not IMD. Anirudh EmaniSay something 10:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cyclone Giri/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Bushranger (talk · contribs) 07:46, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  •   Images are suitable, and appropriately licensed on Commons. (I don't suppose there's any chance of there being any available "aftermath" images to add to the article?)
  •   Article meets MOS format standards, has an infobox.
  •   References appear to be reliable; inline citations are in appropriate places. (Suggest putting a link to reference [50] rght after the "going to be a sham anyways" comment, just to satisfy any quibblers.)
  •   No apparent CP/CV issues, article satisifes the V/N/RS holy trinity
  •   Subject is broadly covered without unnecessary diversions from the topic.
  •   Article is neutral and stable.
  •   Grammar and wordsmithing quibbles:
Lede
  • Wikilink depression
  • "...land depression..." - is this standard terminology?
    • It's a term only used by the IMD but I changed it to tropical depression for consistency's sake. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:33, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...since then, focus has shifted..." should this be past tense now?
Meterological history
  • "...(IMD) area of low pressure..."; suggest "...(IMD) as an area of low pressure..."
  • "Situated in an area..."; suggest "As the depression was situated in an area..."
  • "...with estimated cloud tops between..."; suggest "...with estimated cloud top temperatures between..."
  • "...the pressure bottoming out at..."; can a less colloquial wording be used here?
Preparations
  • "...what Cyclone Nargis did in 2008"; what did Cyclone Nargis do? Perhaps a quick comment on that could be added?
  • "...strong buildings and high ground so as to surive the strong winds." Don't think "so as" should be there, and was there any concern about storm surge?
  • Wikilink military junta.
  • Is there a wikilink for storm signal five?
  • "...the Met Office asked..."; is this the Bangladesh Meteorological Department? "Met Office" doesn't make that clear.
    • Reworded to remove the "Met Office asked" bit altogether Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:41, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Impact
  • "...near the Gangawtaw Pagoda in the city..."; what city? Is this still Kyaukphyu?
    • Yup. Changed "the city" to Kyaukphyu to clarify it though. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...the local Red Cross office..."; should this link to Myanmar Red Cross Society?
  • Is it Arakan or Rakhine State? (and should be wikilinked appropriately)
    • It's Rakhine, though like the country itself, it has two commonly used names. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...in dire need of assistiance..."; is "dire" in the original source? It could be considered hyperbolic.
    • Not sure where that came from...I may have added that a while back but not sure. None of that sentence is in the source so I removed it. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...the death toll is believed to continue to increase over the following days as bodies continue to be found."; this needs modification I believe, for tense at least.
  • "...the at least 94 people..."; extra "the"
Aftermath
  • "...the charity in short order..."; suggest "in short order, the charity..."
  • Wikilink zinc roof sheets
  • "...rice, oil, salt, and pulses..."; might want to wikilink pulses, since I have no idea what they are.
  • Wikilink tarpaulin and mosquito net
  • "...at least six people have died..."; should this be changed to past tense?
  • "...the country offered emergency assistiance..."; this looks slightly awkward. Is there a better way to word this?
  • What is a field monitor? This is unclear, I think.
    • Removed that bit, it's not important and I can't figure out how to reword it so it's clear who they are. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...cared for by the Save the Children foundation"; are "the" and "foundation" necessary, or would "...cared for by Save the Children" be OK?
  • "...prior to Giri's arrival in the country..."; I have the mental image now of a hurricane waiting at the customs office. ;) Is there a better way to word this?
    • Hahaha. I changed arrival to landfall, does that work better? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 14:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • "...little attention was given to the ongoing disaster." Should "by the Junta" be added after this to make sure it's clear?
  • "...thousands of survivors continue to suffer..."; should this be past tense now?
  • That looks like a lot, but it's mostly just minor quibbles; this is very close to reaching GA, and just needs a few tweaks. I've placed it   On hold so those tweaks can be made. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 08:16, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 42 external links on Cyclone Giri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:21, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Very or Extremely? edit

It is just my opinion that the official classification of this storm should either be "Very Severe" or "Extremely Severe" and stick to one or the other throughout the article including the info box and opening statement because at present they contradict each other. I dont use commas. Cthomau5 (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply