ContraPoints' Birth Name edit

The article doesn't give ContraPoints' legal name or gender at birth. These are historical facts that should be included in the family life section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:7600:2b67:61f7:f48d:aa23:65a9 (talk) 12:57, August 24, 2022 (UTC)

Not done. See MOS:GENDERID and MOS:DEADNAME. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 17:59, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
As far as I am aware, the channel has been called ContraPoints since birth and, being a YouTube channel, has no gender of its own. ;-) --DanielRigal (talk) 19:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nonsense. The channel is clearly a woman, because it's never once been searching through a drawer for an hour trying to find something, only to have its wife, sister or mother walk over and retrieve that item from the very front of that drawer with an arch look.
Indeed, I once went looking through all of Wynn's videos for one particular skit I remembered, spending over an hour searching before the very first video I checked started playing on its own and played that very skit. Obviously, the channel is a woman. (I'm not being serious, as I don't believe this is a serious request from the IP. At least not one worth taking seriously.) Happy (Slap me) 20:41, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
It is a serious request. I agree that the article is about the YouTube channel, not the content creator but since there is no separate article for Wynn, this biographical info should be included somewhere. A person's history is very important for context. For example the Caitlyn Jenner article begins as "Caitlyn Marie Jenner (born William Bruce Jenner; October 28, 1949)..." 2603:7000:7600:2B67:B595:D30B:62E1:623E (talk) 14:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
A small, very small remark, RoxySaunders. MOS:GENDERID and MOS:DEADNAME are one and the same guideline. -The Gnome (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the pertinent and necessary correction. Roxy from 2022 will be pleased to learn this. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 15:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The Dead name policy is absurd. You can't wipe away history because of some socio-political agenda. You're not helping your cause this way. 2603:7000:7600:2B67:B595:D30B:62E1:623E (talk) 14:05, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Writing about people under their correct names while respecting their right to keep private matters private is not "some socio-political agenda", it is basic human decency. If you have a problem with the policy then you can discuss that on the policy's talk page. (I'm not saying that you should, only that you can. It certainly won't do you any good.) This conversation is off-topic and we will not be discussing it further here. DanielRigal (talk) 15:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
What history? We don't know Wynn's birth name because it's not public information. Wikipedia is a tertiary source and only publishes information that has already been published in reliable secondary sources. It's no more public than her Social Security number, nor is our omission of her Social Security number any more or less a censorship of history. — Bilorv (talk) 21:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well if it's not public information then this is a moot point. 2603:7000:7600:2B67:F490:48AA:73CA:E9FB (talk) 22:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • The question arises: If, supposedly, Wynn's birth name, becomes public information, should it be included in an article about Wynn's YouTube channel? Methinks not, on account mainly of article focus. -The Gnome (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 September 2023 edit

ContraPoints won the Peabody award for the year 2022. The ceromony was in 2023, but the submission year was 2022. https://peabodyawards.com/award-profile/contrapoints/ Blakevoyles (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Done I've updated it to say 2022. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 March 2024 edit

Updating month and Patreon subscriber count. Youwouldntdownloadacar (talk) 02:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 02:46, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Videos section edit

I'm not going to fight too hard to include this, but I do still believe that it has significant encyclopedic value. There's a reason why we have episode lists for almost all mainstream TV shows. Loki (talk) 17:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

(For future reference: this is about Special:Diff/1190428622 and Special:Diff/1215183675.) I think my opinion is the same as at Talk:ContraPoints/Archive 1#Episodes_table??. It's not typical to have an episode list for media not made by professional production companies. There's not much due weight for the individual episodes, in contrast to many TV programmes that receive episode-by-episode reviews. There's verifiability or historicity issues here in that there is not a complete list, as videos have been removed and not all of them have been transcribed and officially published—but sources and the article are at least somewhat about these old videos. — Bilorv (talk) 22:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 April 2024 edit

change to her subscriber count to accurately reflect the current count as of April 13, 2024 which is 1.79 million compared the 1.73 million listed Reby 1929 (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  DoneRoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 03:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply