Good articleCapitol Hill station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starCapitol Hill station is part of the 1 Line (Sound Transit) stations series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2017Good article nomineeListed
April 13, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 3, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that scrap metal from the demolition of the Capitol Hill station was sold to fund meals for the homeless?
Current status: Good article

Photos of Brenda tunnel boring machine edit

Closeup photos and video on Flickr licensed CC-by that we can import to Commons.--Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:40, 7 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Westlake (Link station) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Capitol Hill station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:16, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Capitol Hill station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Capitol Hill Seattle Blog is not a reliable source edit

What exactly is Capitol Hill Seattle Blog (CHS Blog)? According to its online About page, "On CHS, anybody can add to the site. You just need to login and start posting." In other words, a typical collaborative or group blog. This is not dispelled by CHS Blog's Wikipedia page, which contains just three sentences:

The Capitol Hill Seattle Blog (also known as CHS Blog) is a hyperlocal news website covering the Capitol Hill neighborhood of Seattle, United States. Established in 2006, its publisher is Justin Carder. Its reporting has been sourced by the Seattle Times, Seattle Metropolitan, KCPQ-TV, the Puget Sound Business Journal, and others.

For our purposes, that last sentence is problematic. A handful of WP:RS having cited CHS Blog should not sway us in determining whether or not to cite CHS Blog ourselves. We must rely solely on Wikipedia:Verifiability. And in doing so, it's hard to escape the conclusion that CHS Blog—self-published by its founder, Justin Carder—violates WP:BLOGS, which directs: Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer. (Emphasis in original.)

I propose that we remove all citations to CHS Blog and replace with better sources. NedFausa (talk) 21:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

That section of WP:V only applies to BLPs, not a catch-all. The relevant policy is at WP:USINGSPS, which does not ban their use and encourages users to think critically about using sources, which is something that has been done before wrt blogs. The CHS sources used here are for information that is not found in Seattle's newspapers, archived TV/radio news station articles, or in transit documents, so replicating them would be extremely difficult. At the same time, the authors of these pieces include Carder, the president of the local historical society, and an interview. I can't see any of these being controversial enough to be removed without proper investigation. This discussion should not be split away from Talk:Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone. SounderBruce 22:04, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • The crucial part of Capitol Hill Seattle Blog is not its brevity but this: Its reporting has been sourced by the Seattle Times, Seattle Metropolitan, KCPQ-TV, the Puget Sound Business Journal, and others. Such reporting-on-reporting by reliable sources is a sign of reliability. In other words, I agree with SounderBruce. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)Reply