Talk:Budd Company

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 100.34.164.189 in topic Life Insurance Policy

Reading "Crusader" train edit

Something should be written about the Reading "Crusader" train. Originally built in 1937 by the Budd Company for the Reading Railroad. --71.242.228.107 21:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Are these related articles? edit

The focus of this article is on the firm's railcar business. However, the Ambi Budd article focuses on the firm's role in the automobile industry. Should they be linked or combined? CZmarlin 02:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Linked: yes. Combined/merged: Perhaps, but the current Budd Company article is already a bit lengthy. Could we expand the Ambi Budd article some more to support it as an independent article? Also, for anyone interested, I am not aware of any article regarding Budd's forays into aerospace engineering. At the moment I cannot locate much information on this other than in family records, which may not fare too well with WP:OR and WP:NPOV. Cheers! --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 03:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Reply
I think Ambi Budd was the German arm of the Budd Company. Biscuittin (talk) 19:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Shot Welding Incorrectly Credited? edit

This article credits the invention of Shot Welding to Edward Budd, but other wikipedia articles (on the Pioneer Zephyr and Shot Welding) contradict this, indicating it was actually invented by Earl Ragsdale. Perhaps this should be amended?

Shultze 20:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shultze (talkcontribs) 20:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Say, Budd edit

If they're such a pioneer in automobiles, howcum the article is entirely about railway? No mention of the early Dodge bodies? Nothing? Trekphiler 05:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Because those who have worked on the article so far had references for rail transport and not necessarily automobiles. If you've got the reliable sources, properly cited additions would be wonderful. Slambo (Speak) 15:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
If you have any good sources for Budd's aerospace program, that'd be nifty, too! I have a few but haven't yet had the chance to add the in. --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 02:00, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of Automotives edit

I worked for The Budd Company from 1972 to 1989 when the Frankfort, Ohio plant was sold to AlliedSignal. We made steel wheels for Semi-trailer trucks, Especially Kenworth, Which operated their own plant less than 20 miles away in Chillicothe, Ohio. The wheels are still seen today on truck trailers, and are distinctive for having only 2 holes in the wheel disk for hand holds. <Like this> We also were the first in that industry to use a powder-coat paint process for wheels. I have no references to this information. I just worked there Toothpickst (talk) 10:15, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
Speaking of the Frankfort Ohio plant, this photo is of a one-room schoolhouse in Frankfort, from the town's Wikipedia entry. The Budd Company plant is the blue building visible in the background.Toothpickst (talk) 10:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Update to article edit

The lastest news with this company is a purchase from Thyssenkrupp AG by Martinrea Ltd. Also the automotive end of the business retained the Budd Company moniker until this purchase in December 2006. The Canadian CAW local 1451 from the Kitchener plant has a brief article on the purchase on their website: https://www.cawlocal.ca/1451/default.asp

This really should be combined with the above mentioned article. Perhaps there should be a general article on Budd until the company split into rail and auto forays and then link to separate pages for details on those sectors. There is also some stories about one of the Budd factories making appliances for a time.

Yugotme (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2008 (UTC)yugotmeReply

Fair use rationale for Image:BuddMichelineLafayette.jpeg edit

 

Image:BuddMichelineLafayette.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:04, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Done -- added rationale. Slambo (Speak) 11:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:OP-2289.jpg edit

 

Image:OP-2289.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

PATCO edit

The Budd PATCO trains circa 1968 are still in use. I ride on one almost daily. the only one with the original "Budd" emblem that I have noticed is the 101 car that does leak a bit in heavy rains. Not bat for a train car that is older than I! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.143.7.149 (talk) 12:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

TransitAmerica Redirect edit

Why Does TransitAmeirca, A transportation operations contractor redirect here? This appears to be a vehicle manufacture.--Charles E. Keisler (talk), A+ Network+ and Security+ Certified 17:19, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lancia Lambda edit

The Lancia was different from Budd type car bodies because it was variously described as a 'punt','hull','boat' or 'ship' type monocoque. It was originally an open tourer without a stressed roof. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.208.212.56 (talk) 02:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Budd Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Budd Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Budd Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Life Insurance Policy edit

Trying to find out if the Budd Company still pays out for Life Insurance Policies 100.34.164.189 (talk) 20:34, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

How do I find out if the old Budd Company pays out for Life Insurance policies? 100.34.164.189 (talk) 20:37, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I’m attempting to find out if I can collect on my deceased husband’s life insurance policy? 100.34.164.189 (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2023 (UTC)Reply