Untitled edit

Article reads like copied promotional boilerplate from Bolger's website -- I tried to add some ballast from the rather more balanced Crimson profile, including references to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.89.55 (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removal of "proposed deletion" notice edit

I don't think that this article should be deleted without at least an AFD discussion. I agree that Benjamin Bolger doesn't seem to be notable (in Wikipedia terms) as a sociologist, but searching LexisNexis and Google News Archive turns up what I think is sufficient coverage to take him past the general notability guideline. Even discounting articles in which Bolger is quoted on other topics, there are substantial profiles in newspapers like The Philadelphia Inquirer and The Ann Arbor News. Much of the coverage concentrates on how his academic achievements are in spite of his dyslexia, which arguably makes them more worthy of notice than those of other "perpetual students" like Johnny Lechner. EALacey (talk) 21:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

move to delete page edit

bolger doesn't appear to be at W&M any more. also, none of the cited links work. harvard's design school doesn't seem to offer a doctoral-level degree in urban planning, as his website claims, and no dissertation-level work of his appears on proquest or other databases. move to delete page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.5.94.233 (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

comment on modern day student edit

Bolger is not the most credentialed student. maybe modern wise he is, but there are many many people today with loads more degrees than him. there is a guy in India with probably 30 masters, an MD, doctorates, and several honorary degrees not included in the aforementioned. there is a guy who is a professor of psychiatry (should be psychology) as a leader at Cumberlands online school. He has a physiology doctorate from yale, MD from the Caribbean, at least 1 or more doctorates in civil engineering, and is a licensed doctor and professional engineer in multiple states. he has a Ph.D. in clinical psychology also. there are professional students all over, but not everyone likes to talk about it. I do admire Bolger though and his prestigious degrees and desire to learn, but he needs to look up some of his competitors from a google search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.142.189.118 (talk) 02:23, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

keep him on edit

I think Bolger is notable enough in modern times that he should be kept on here. today, everyone and their mother is on Wikipedia. he does have some publicity, earning several high-ranking degrees, and getting in the news should give him at least a few lines on here. should a person be on Wikipedia as a porn star? should they be on because they earned an MD at an early age? can we name any other people with 10 high-ranking master's degrees from America from recent times? the article should not however be blown out of proportion until more things come about from his activities as a professional, or if he does anything in the media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.142.189.118 (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Benjamin Bolger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Removed references to his consulting services edit

I removed references to his consulting services, as they are irrelevant to the article as a whole. 66.228.73.76 (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)AnonReply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benjamin Bolger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Benjamin Bolger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

remove profile/bio edit

For some reason Bolger seems to think that just because he has allegedly earned many college degrees, that it somehow makes him notable. This is a dangerous example to set for everyone interested in real academics. Bolger isn't even published in ANY journal, book, or publication of any kind, yet claims to have degrees from virtually every major school, including harvard, where he claims to have a doctorate. I've never encountered a person with such alleged clout who is never published. Doesn't it strike you as odd? I think allowing his profile to remain does Wikipedia a great disservice. It sends the message that people can use your platform to market themselves, but not really have done anything truly notable. What has he actually accomplished? Nothing. Apparently, all that Bolger does is to work as a self-employed consultant. I would like to see this taken down asap. Gandolfthewhite (talk) 12:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is irrelevant what Bolger thinks. What is relevant is what we think about whether he meets the Wikipedia standards of notability, in this case WP:GNG. I think the independent coverage of Bolger's degree-hunting behavior, for instance in the US News and Chronicle of Higher Education, makes that clear enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
New editor here, still learning. I agree with Gandolfthewhite. This article reads as self-promoting. Bolger's significance does not seem to meet the standards of Wikipedia. KnIsPow (talk) 19:06, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

actual degree records in the world, versus in English edit

Bolger is the second most credentialed person in history, in English. But he is the fourth most credentialed person in history in general, or without regard to language. The person holding the most degrees in this broader sense is V.N. Parthiban. https://venasnews.co.ke/2017/11/30/meet-the-most-educated-person-in-the-world-vn-parthiban-who-holds-145-academic-degrees/#:~:text=degrees%20%E2%80%93%20Venas%20News-,Meet%20the%20most%20Educated%20Person%20in%20the%20World%2C%20VN%20Parthiban,who%20holds%20145%20academic%20degrees&text=Professor%20VN%20Parthiban%20is%20ranked,educated%20person%20in%20the%20world.

Michael W. Nicholson comes in second broadly speaking, and first in English, with twenty-nine degrees. The third most educated person in history, is apparently Shrikant Jichkar, with twenty degrees. Bolger holds fourteen.Cdg1072 (talk) 16:24, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm not suggesting by the way that Wikipedia is a reliable source, e.g., for Shrikant Jichkar. I understand Wikipedia does not consider itself a reliable source.76.165.129.178 (talk) 01:43, 6 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Benjamin Bolger for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Benjamin Bolger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Bolger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KnIsPow (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Why is this the top trending story on Wikipedia? edit

The app is telling me this is the top trending story. Wth? I can't figure out any reason. (also apologies I'm not signing with ip address, I am blanking on the syntax, and I'm on my phone so it's not easy to just switch tabs and look it up) 2600:1017:B12F:4B4E:EC1B:F670:33D0:F490 (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh nice, the app auto-adds the signature anyway. Phew! 2600:1017:B12F:4B4E:EC1B:F670:33D0:F490 (talk) 12:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Most likely due to it being featured on r/todayilearned on Reddit yesterday. (to sign posts, use four tildes: ~~~~) TGHL ↗ 🍁 17:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply