Talk:Ashton Turner

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Middle name edit

An editor professing a conflict of interest attempted to change the middle name. In trying to verify the change, I found contradictory sources:

Those are the only two publishers cited as sources. With two roughly equal sources contradicting, I've removed the middle name. The claims of an alleged relative aren't verifiable and can't be used to support the change. —C.Fred (talk) 23:58, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

The sites quoted are not reliable sources. Try the Cricket Australia or WACA websites. There are further errors in the introductory paragraph - but it is a bit unnecessarily complicated to edit and correct (Spinattack (talk) 15:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC))Reply
Further, the middle name James is confirmed by the espncricinfo site and does verify the 'alleged relatives' advice. It is a bit troubling that incorrect information can be posted and thus published (incorrectly) holds some weight when challenged and has no basis in fact. Incorrect information once published remains incorrect. (Spinattack (talk) 16:08, 25 July 2013 (UTC))Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ashton Turner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply