Talk:Angel in the Night
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Narutolovehinata5 in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Angel in the Night article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
 | It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Pop Rock? edit
Would this also classify as Pop Rock? To me, it's very reminiscent of the Pop Rock on today's radio, especially with the guitar.--ToyoWolf (talk) 00:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
music video content problems in need of fixing edit
im going to fix this now, but i will put here what it previously said and explain why i changed it this one part bugs me because a)part of it is incorrect, and b)another part is totally irrelavent and uneeded(i know, spelling errors, its late) it previously said "drag race but in Need For Speed it is call Street X" for change A, i will change "drag race" to "drift race" as that is what it is. drag is totally different. for change B, i will remove the "but in Need For Speed it is call Street X" as i see NO relavence to it! Willgame4food (talk) 04:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- No longer in article. It was just a street race.
Done Eurohunter (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Was ineligible at the time of the nomination. No prejudice against a renomination if the article is brought to GA status.
( )
- ... that "Angel in the Night" in 2022 was certified Silver for sales of 200,000 copies in the United Kingdom? Source: https://www.bpi.co.uk/award/18021-2716-1
5x expanded by Eurohunter (talk). Self-nominated at 14:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC).
Hi Eurohunter, this isn't turning up as a 5x expansion in readable prose size and isn't eligible on recency for that reason. It now has 3174 characters and it had 1636 on May 5. I might suggest that, if this nomination had continued, I would have worried about the hook—is it notable for a single to be certified 14 years after release in this genre? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: How I can count that? Certification is always notable in any music genre. I will think on other proposals. Eurohunter (talk) 07:22, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- (I should have meant unusual or attention-worthy last time, not notable...oops!) WP:DYKCHECK is what we use to calculate readable prose size. I also wanted to flag, Eurohunter, that since you already have had six nominations, each of your three pending DYK nominations requires a QPQ (a review of another page) to be considered. (This was changed to per nomination, not per article approved, which is notable for you since you've had 3 DYKs approved and 3 rejected.) So, not counting this page (that can't go forward), you will need at least a QPQ for Fest i hela huset. You might want to ask at WT:DYK if you need one for Life Speaks to Me, but given the backlog we have, I strongly recommend it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Good to know so I will try to review something what is familiar to me (Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide). Eurohunter (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- I have added QPQ for Fest i hela huset. Eurohunter (talk) 19:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Good to know so I will try to review something what is familiar to me (Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide). Eurohunter (talk) 08:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- (I should have meant unusual or attention-worthy last time, not notable...oops!) WP:DYKCHECK is what we use to calculate readable prose size. I also wanted to flag, Eurohunter, that since you already have had six nominations, each of your three pending DYK nominations requires a QPQ (a review of another page) to be considered. (This was changed to per nomination, not per article approved, which is notable for you since you've had 3 DYKs approved and 3 rejected.) So, not counting this page (that can't go forward), you will need at least a QPQ for Fest i hela huset. You might want to ask at WT:DYK if you need one for Life Speaks to Me, but given the backlog we have, I strongly recommend it. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 07:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)