Talk:2017 Indian Premier League

Map

Hey , This map is not India's correct map. Please change this picture else we will report this issue. Please use some pic which includes kashmir as part of india.

Mumbai

Kolkata

Punjab

Bangalore

Gujarat

Delhi

Hyderabad

Pune

Punjab

Gujarat

Supergiant not Supergiants

Rising Pune Supergiants name has changed to Rising Pine Supergiant. Its better to vote at respective talk to get consensus, to change article title instead of correcting spellings In this article.

India's Map used is not Correct.

Please use India's Map which includes Kashmir region. We will report this issue if not taken care of soon. 223.182.45.241 (talk) 19:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

wicket taker

For 1st match SRH vs RCB, Chahal is lead wicket taker as per best bowling economy in RCB inngs, we can check this thing in the previous seasons/match summary. See here for the match summary. (Cricbuzz mobile view). 117.246.70.82 (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Lead wicket taker decide Depending on most wickets if wickets got same, then go to Best Economy Rate. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

See here. Thank you and bye. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 18:43, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

We can see the lead wicket taker list after the match end, Match Summary will be shows as per bowling economy. we can also see from official site also for this. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Dispute

User:Lugnuts and User:Cricket246, I wonder if either of you could help with this. I've always known it that when two or more players take the same number of wickets, the player with the fewest runs conceded regardless of overs bowled/economy rate is shown to have the best figures. The above source used by User:117.246.70.82 is by Cricbuzz rather than Cricinfo which shows Yuzvendra Chahal as having best figures in the innings with 1/22 off 4 overs, whereas other sources such as Sky Sports and the parent IPL TV broadcaster would credit Stuart Binny with best figures of 1/10 off 1 over. Joalhe1997 (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

In Wikipedia as well as in case of the official scorecards for IPL the player who conceeds the fewest runs, irrespective of overs bowled or economy rate, is said to have the best figures. In Wikipedia, we always stick by that convention in general so it definitely should be Stuart Binny as far as I think. 🙂 Cricket246 (talk)

Per Template:Single-innings_cricket_match/doc#Parameters - "The bowler who took the greatest number of wickets in team1's and team2's innings respectively. If two or more bowlers took an equal number of wickets, the one who conceded the least number of runs must be listed." So 1 for 10 runs would be listed, regardless of overs bowled/economy rate. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hello users, if we observe the previous season stats, at ESPNCriciinfo we can found the list based on the best economy. We also edited as per the stats previous season. That stats are Actual stats, based on template that's our manual of style. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 19:00, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

We've established a long consensus on Wikipedia to use the method highlighted above. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Ok, guys as your wish. But still in wiki I had seen the list or template as per the best economy. ok carry on guys, enjoy the our edits. I think we have to protect the page/article now. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 19:08, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Hey friends, why you use full form of the Nations and Franchise name in the result section from 2016 Indian Premier League season, before 2016 we use short form for all. 117.246.70.82 (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Because Cricinfo scorecards, official IPL scorecards and Indian domestic cricket in general uses the full forms. Just we follow a separate scoring pattern​ for Australian games, similarly this is a pattern we follow for Indian domestic games. It's not possible for me to sit and edit 9 previous seasons due to shortage of time but I've been maintaining this since last season i.e. 2016 onwards. Cricket246 (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Then why we don't follow the cricinfo and official site, for match summary. Why used manual of style. Why we don't follow difference for similar edits. 117.249.188.42 (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Flag

Flag is incorrect for Chris Lyn it will be Australia's flag Asad Zaffar (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

I think it's been fixed (infact, I'm sure I fixed it), but he's not on the list anyone, so it's moot. On a related note, I wonder why it's only the top 4 players, and not top 5. But I don't really care about that. I'm sure the cruft train will arrive in due course. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2017 Indian Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170221010445/http://www.iplt20.com/news/2017/announcements/8016/vivo-ipl-player-auction-2017 to http://www.iplt20.com/news/2017/announcements/8016/vivo-ipl-player-auction-2017

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)