Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 20
June 22 >

June 21 edit

Template:ClubSwan 50 World Championship medallists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused medal table all the content is on ClubSwan 50 World Championship with improved referencing. yachty4000 ( (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canada squad 2023 CONCACAF Nations League Finals edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per previous discussions about Nations League squad navboxes. (see June 2019, July 2020, January 2022) KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 21:47, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except in one user page. Izno (talk) 21:30, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NJHPO header edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template unused in mainspace. Izno (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NJHPO row edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single page template meant for table rows with insufficient quantity to need a full template of its own. Izno (talk) 21:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I would lean toward Keep, even though this is used only in New Jersey Register of Historic Places. It appears to be sufficiently complex that using its code directly in the article would be pretty unpleasant and more difficult for regular editors to modify. If there are similar templates for other states, it may be possible to generalize this template for use in articles elsewhere, or to use those other templates in this New Jersey article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It looks complex, but it ultimately isn't if you look at its use. There's quite a bit of repetition regarding sorting, some coord links, a lot of parsing of wikitext that would be avoided by it not being a template. In reality, this is trivial once substed. As for generalization, there are other historic places row templates that have much more use than this one, and given how little this one is used, I don't think the new uses are going to spring up anywhere. Izno (talk) 19:01, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete I played around with Special:ExpandTemplates and came to the same conclusion as Izno. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:24, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete per above, I will replace it with {{NRHP row}} to match the headers (only difference is the link, which can be specified manually). Frietjes (talk) 15:20, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Reflinks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used on only a handful of pages, this can be trivially reproduced in wikitext without the need of a template. Izno (talk) 18:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oswald at Bardney edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:38, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article content used in two articles. Use section transclusion instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst completely and delete. I see no reason to use section transclusion. Izno (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Origin of fire edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article content used in two articles. Use section transclusion instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:17, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst completely and delete. I see no reason to use section transclusion. Izno (talk) 21:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Irgun Commanders edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iran hospitals 1920 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iranian Americans by location edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:33, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough content for a navbox. Created in 2014. Only one article in the relevant category. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Governors of Subcarpathian Ruthenia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:32, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough content for a navbox. No apparent potential for expansion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:First Nations and Endangered languages edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sidebar template used (and usable) in just one article. Full of external links, a potential violation of WP:EL. At a minimum, subst into the article and uncollapse the content. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Energy production edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2014. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know this was created by request, but I have absolutely no idea who it was, or where they put in the request (I checked my talk page and requested templates archives). Kind of disappointed it's not being used, but it may have been superseded by something better in the last 9 years. Go ahead and delete it if nobody's using it any more. VanIsaac, GHTV contWpWS 17:27, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Craig edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:29, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed in-line maintenance template from 2016 with no template parameters, and which does not apply a category. Never adopted. Subst the one transclusion and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:51, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Christian Fellowships edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox has been empty since its creation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:44, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Transcom Group Media edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN, insufficient blue links to facilitate navigation. ✗plicit 13:14, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Maiden voyage sinkings edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 June 28. Izno (talk) 16:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Titanic last survivors edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:24, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I see the navigational benefit of this navbox. The list of survivors is included in {{RMS Titanic}}, and context is given at Passengers of the Titanic#Last passenger survivors to die. Without the context this is a bit of a random collection of people, and including the context here isn't the purpose of a navbox. --woodensuperman 09:33, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the purpose is to show the last survivors of the Titanic, seems fine as a navbox to the various article. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But how does it show the last survivors? Some are by nationality, other by class. etc. Lillian Asplund is "the last living survivor who could recall the disaster". You have to read the article to understand exactly what you are navigating here, which does not provide a useful navigation aid. Best left to the navbox already showing the survivors (a duplication, I may add), and the article for the context. --woodensuperman 14:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It shows them based on who died most recently. Look at the death dates. The last name on the template was the last living survivor. Also, where are you getting class/nationality from this template? They aren’t organized that way at all. It’s simply a list of the half dozen or so passengers who lived longest from the date of the disaster. Piratesswoop (talk) 20:19, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But you have to get the information from the article Passengers of the Titanic#Last passenger survivors to die, and not all of the people have articles. The navbox is not intuitive, so does not provide a useful navigation tool. --woodensuperman 08:05, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You don't HAVEto get the information from the article. You can simply click on the names in the nav box and go to their articles to read additional information about them in particular. That's the point of having a navbox in the first place, no? Piratesswoop (talk) 13:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The point of a navbox is to navigate a series, but without the information it is not clear in which order you are navigating between them, and as some of the people do not have articles it's not remotely intuitive. And all the links are already at {{RMS Titanic}} anyway, so there is substantial duplication. It's just unnecessary. Also, there seems to be an arrbitrary cut-off point as to when we start counting the last survivors. --woodensuperman 14:06, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Karnataka Premier League edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:20, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every link is just a redirect back to Maharaja Trophy T20, as per various AFD consensuses to do so. As such, this template does no actual navigation, and so is not needed Joseph2302 (talk) 08:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Page reports edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:56, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abandoned project by a now-CBANed editor. Also propose deletion of all subpages. CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 05:10, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose deleting because the editor has been C-banned. However, this has had no work done on it in almost ten years, so something should happen. I'm not sure if there's a place where these sorts of projects can be listed to be reclaimed by a new, interested editor, but I'd like to see it placed up for adoption before taking the otherwise reasonable step of deletion due to inactivity. VanIsaac, GHTV contWpWS 05:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. Izno (talk) 21:55, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_21&oldid=1162860025"