Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 22

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 21
June 23 >

June 22 edit

Template:Hotline Miami edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD G7 Liz Read! Talk! 18:34, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I created this in 2015, but it's unnecessary. There's just two games, all directly related articles (sequel, predecessor, developer, publishers) are repeatedly mentioned in the articles. Not needed. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 20:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Writing/litspotlight1 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While this is marked as a transclusionless template, the page it is said to be used on, Wikipedia:WikiProject Writing/litspotlight, does not exist. There are also no incoming links to this. Gonnym (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IMDb rating edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

seems excessive, especially since IMDb ratings are changing as people vote at IMDb, and the icon goes against MOS:ICON. Frietjes (talk) 17:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH elevation/high edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and seems that Template:PH elevation was never a tempalte. Gonnym (talk) 16:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH electorate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:04, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. 5 years ago this was apparently used and kept at TfD, but has since had its usages removed. Gonnym (talk) 16:44, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PH empty edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, undocumented and has no code in it. Gonnym (talk) 16:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chronology of Gaullist groups in the Senate of France edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused political related table. Gonnym (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, after the articles were redirected, this is no longer being used. Frietjes (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pseudo image edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

generally redundant to the more widely used {{image frame}} as demonstrated here, should be replaced and redirected. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Float box edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can be replaced by {{stack}}. float box has the same purpose as {{stack}} (which has much heavier usage), should be replaced and redirected. Frietjes (talk) 15:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nations at the 2026 Winter Olympics edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:02, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Too early for this. Can be recreated in a couple years. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:TOOSOON. And there is literally nothing to navigate. --woodensuperman 15:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete way WP:TOOSOON, these article should be getting created a few months before the event i.e. late 2025 (though I imagine people will start creating them too early before that, as they are with the 2024 Summer Olympics articles for these). Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. We don't know the country that will 2026 Winter Olympics or possibly it will change. Vitaium (talk) 12:36, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Liberty ships templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 15:01, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A prime example of where categories and lists are a far better method than a navbox (WP:CLT). These navboxes are horifically excessive and really aren't a particularly useful or efficient way to navigate between the topics, especially with most of them them lost in a sea of redlinks. --woodensuperman 15:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, better to use a list article and category to navigate here. if I am viewing an article about a Liberty ship starting with "A", why would I only be interested in navigating to other Liberty ships with the same starting letter? Frietjes (talk) 16:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football at the 2019 South Asian Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 06:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not enough blue links- only 2, and I don't believe that the squad articles that are red linked should be created, as the tournament doesn't have enough coverage for them to be independently notable Joseph2302 (talk) 09:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Soft keep: Have coverage not bad actually, the SAG women tournament is played by the respective senior teams, and considered a big achievement in SA region. Adding few sources here for clarification, Firstpost, The Quint, AFC, Nepal Times, The Katmandu Post, India Today, Sportskeeda There are more. However, I am not sure of the red links, I can try to create the squads, but not now, occupied with other project right now. Drat8sub (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Paul edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused in mainspace. Izno (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_22&oldid=1162618502"